RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    ОСОБЕННОСТИ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО РА3ВИТИЯ ДАЛЬНЕГО ВОСТОКА РОССИИ И РЕСПУБЛИКИ КОРЕЯ = Features of Economic Development of Far East of Russia And Republic of Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76389594

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The decision of various problems of economic growth is connected with problems of an estimation of a production efficiency and contribution of production factors. Reliable results of these evaluations would allow us to see a true value cost of achievement of production results and develop a strategy of economic development. Thus, the same output increase can be achieved both at the expense of extensive growth of production factors and at the expense of their qualitative improvement. Dynamics of the data of economy of Russia, unfortunately, does not allow to receive reliable statistical dependences. Therefore we shall consider modeling of an industry of Khabarovsk territory of 1971 1985 and Korea economy of 1970 2001.
    The most spreading approach to model a technical progress is a model of dynamic Cobb Douglas production function with a constant average annual rate of growth of production because of technical progress: Y??=A·K????·L??????·e????. Though this, hypothesis is not always true for all economic objects. An incorrect choice of the hypothesis of the effects of technical progress on the production growth can lead to erroneous estimates (to negative function parameters). For a better analysis of a modern reality the author offered for consideration a new production function with varying effects of unconsidered factors on final results of production and developed a new method of evaluation of parameters of a function [l 5].
    The calculations show that Q?? and λ·t values dynamics (Figures 12) does not coincide in the case for Khabarovsk Territory Industry (1971 1985) but it coincides for the economy of Korea 0970 2001) in the whole. For economy of Korea the meaning of parameter A is equal to 0.042. It means, that during 1970 2001 the value of average annual increase rate of GDP was 4.2% (Table 1).
    The production efficiency of Korea in 1970's, 1980's, 1990's increased by 20.73%, 47.98% and 53.58% respectively. In 2001 the production efficiency of Korea increased in 2.744 times relatively of 1970 (Table 2).
    The extensive contribution E?? into the Increase of output in 1970 1975, 1970 1980, 1970 1985, 1970 1990, 1970 1995, 1970 2001 were respectively (Table 3): 66.94%, 73.59%, 59.58%, 66.81 %, 63.60% and 43.03%. Therefore, the development of Korea in 1970 2001 was mainly extensive till financial crisis 1997 because during almost all period the aggregate contribution E?? of the extensive factors exceeded 50%. Only after crisis 1997 as a result of transformations in economy the contribution of the extensive factors sharply have decreased and was less than 50%.
    번역하기

    The decision of various problems of economic growth is connected with problems of an estimation of a production efficiency and contribution of production factors. Reliable results of these evaluations would allow us to see a true value cost of achieve...

    The decision of various problems of economic growth is connected with problems of an estimation of a production efficiency and contribution of production factors. Reliable results of these evaluations would allow us to see a true value cost of achievement of production results and develop a strategy of economic development. Thus, the same output increase can be achieved both at the expense of extensive growth of production factors and at the expense of their qualitative improvement. Dynamics of the data of economy of Russia, unfortunately, does not allow to receive reliable statistical dependences. Therefore we shall consider modeling of an industry of Khabarovsk territory of 1971 1985 and Korea economy of 1970 2001.
    The most spreading approach to model a technical progress is a model of dynamic Cobb Douglas production function with a constant average annual rate of growth of production because of technical progress: Y??=A·K????·L??????·e????. Though this, hypothesis is not always true for all economic objects. An incorrect choice of the hypothesis of the effects of technical progress on the production growth can lead to erroneous estimates (to negative function parameters). For a better analysis of a modern reality the author offered for consideration a new production function with varying effects of unconsidered factors on final results of production and developed a new method of evaluation of parameters of a function [l 5].
    The calculations show that Q?? and λ·t values dynamics (Figures 12) does not coincide in the case for Khabarovsk Territory Industry (1971 1985) but it coincides for the economy of Korea 0970 2001) in the whole. For economy of Korea the meaning of parameter A is equal to 0.042. It means, that during 1970 2001 the value of average annual increase rate of GDP was 4.2% (Table 1).
    The production efficiency of Korea in 1970's, 1980's, 1990's increased by 20.73%, 47.98% and 53.58% respectively. In 2001 the production efficiency of Korea increased in 2.744 times relatively of 1970 (Table 2).
    The extensive contribution E?? into the Increase of output in 1970 1975, 1970 1980, 1970 1985, 1970 1990, 1970 1995, 1970 2001 were respectively (Table 3): 66.94%, 73.59%, 59.58%, 66.81 %, 63.60% and 43.03%. Therefore, the development of Korea in 1970 2001 was mainly extensive till financial crisis 1997 because during almost all period the aggregate contribution E?? of the extensive factors exceeded 50%. Only after crisis 1997 as a result of transformations in economy the contribution of the extensive factors sharply have decreased and was less than 50%.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • References
    • Summary
    • References
    • Summary
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼