RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      비골골절치료에서 기도 튜브 머로셀®의 유용성 = The Usefulness of Airway Tube Merocel® on Treatment of Nasal Bone Fracture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104754349

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Nasal packing materials are almost inserted
      at the end stage of closed reduction of nasal bone for
      postoperative bleeding control and stabilization of nasal
      bone. Conventionally, vaseline gauze was used for
      packing of nasal cavity. These days, Surgeons have tried
      to apply Merocel® into the nasal cavity more easily. It is
      difficult for patients to continue keeping the nasal packs
      for more than a week due to breathing difficulty. Moreover,
      nasal packing itself can also cause headache, dry
      mouth, stuffiness, etc.
      Methods: We performed a prospective study from March
      1, 2008 to July 31, 2008. One hundred patients were divided
      into "Merocel® packing group" and "Merocel® and Airway
      Tube Merocel® packing group". Using two kinds of materials
      to each group after closed reduction, we observed and
      compared the amount of bleeding between two groups. We
      recorded patient‘s uncomfortable symptoms which were
      divided into four groups each 6, 24, 48 hours after nasal
      packing.
      Results: The result of the bleeding amount of Air Tube
      Merocel® group after 6 hours of nasal packing is that 3
      people belong to mild group, 38 people moderate group, and
      9 people severe group. After 6 hours of nasal packing, 11
      patients have no complains. 16 patients were mild, 21
      patients were moderate, 2 patients were severe. After 24
      hours of nasal packing, no complain(18 patients), mild(24
      patients), moderate(6 patients), severe(0 patient). After 48
      hours of nasal packing, no complain(25 patients), mild(20
      patients), moderate(5 patients), severe(0 patient).
      Conclusion: Regarding the amount of bleeding, there are
      no difference between two groups. In case of Air Tube
      Merocel® group, patient's discomfort is gradually improved
      after 24 hours of nasal packing, After 48 hours of
      nasal packing, most of the patients do not experience
      headache, dry mouth, stuffiness, etc. Therefore, Air Tube
      Merocel® can be useful for bleeding control. Moreover, it
      helps patients to breathe through nose more easily and
      reduce discomfort.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Nasal packing materials are almost inserted at the end stage of closed reduction of nasal bone for postoperative bleeding control and stabilization of nasal bone. Conventionally, vaseline gauze was used for packing of nasal cavity. These days...

      Purpose: Nasal packing materials are almost inserted
      at the end stage of closed reduction of nasal bone for
      postoperative bleeding control and stabilization of nasal
      bone. Conventionally, vaseline gauze was used for
      packing of nasal cavity. These days, Surgeons have tried
      to apply Merocel® into the nasal cavity more easily. It is
      difficult for patients to continue keeping the nasal packs
      for more than a week due to breathing difficulty. Moreover,
      nasal packing itself can also cause headache, dry
      mouth, stuffiness, etc.
      Methods: We performed a prospective study from March
      1, 2008 to July 31, 2008. One hundred patients were divided
      into "Merocel® packing group" and "Merocel® and Airway
      Tube Merocel® packing group". Using two kinds of materials
      to each group after closed reduction, we observed and
      compared the amount of bleeding between two groups. We
      recorded patient‘s uncomfortable symptoms which were
      divided into four groups each 6, 24, 48 hours after nasal
      packing.
      Results: The result of the bleeding amount of Air Tube
      Merocel® group after 6 hours of nasal packing is that 3
      people belong to mild group, 38 people moderate group, and
      9 people severe group. After 6 hours of nasal packing, 11
      patients have no complains. 16 patients were mild, 21
      patients were moderate, 2 patients were severe. After 24
      hours of nasal packing, no complain(18 patients), mild(24
      patients), moderate(6 patients), severe(0 patient). After 48
      hours of nasal packing, no complain(25 patients), mild(20
      patients), moderate(5 patients), severe(0 patient).
      Conclusion: Regarding the amount of bleeding, there are
      no difference between two groups. In case of Air Tube
      Merocel® group, patient's discomfort is gradually improved
      after 24 hours of nasal packing, After 48 hours of
      nasal packing, most of the patients do not experience
      headache, dry mouth, stuffiness, etc. Therefore, Air Tube
      Merocel® can be useful for bleeding control. Moreover, it
      helps patients to breathe through nose more easily and
      reduce discomfort.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Donald ED, "imtranasal airway/pack: description of a new device" 93 : 808-, 1983

      2 Breda SD, "Toxic shock syndrome in nasal surgery: a physiochemical and microbiologic evaluation of Merocel and Nugauze nasal packing" 97 : 1388-, 1987

      3 Sprekelsen B, "The postoperative nasal dressing. A new intranasal splint" 28 : 197-, 1990

      4 Schultz LW, "Nasal splints. Advantages, disadvantages and author's modifications" 94 : 897-, 1957

      5 Mabry RL, "Management of epistaxis by packing" 94 : 401-, 1986

      6 Fairbanks DNF, "Complications of nasal packing" 94 : 412-, 1986

      7 Doyle DE, "Anterior epistaxis. A new nasal tampon for fast effective control" 96 : 279-, 1986

      8 Ruddy J, "A prospective trial of Merocel packs" 29 : 281-, 1991

      9 Garth RJN, "A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery" 108 : 564-, 1994

      1 Donald ED, "imtranasal airway/pack: description of a new device" 93 : 808-, 1983

      2 Breda SD, "Toxic shock syndrome in nasal surgery: a physiochemical and microbiologic evaluation of Merocel and Nugauze nasal packing" 97 : 1388-, 1987

      3 Sprekelsen B, "The postoperative nasal dressing. A new intranasal splint" 28 : 197-, 1990

      4 Schultz LW, "Nasal splints. Advantages, disadvantages and author's modifications" 94 : 897-, 1957

      5 Mabry RL, "Management of epistaxis by packing" 94 : 401-, 1986

      6 Fairbanks DNF, "Complications of nasal packing" 94 : 412-, 1986

      7 Doyle DE, "Anterior epistaxis. A new nasal tampon for fast effective control" 96 : 279-, 1986

      8 Ruddy J, "A prospective trial of Merocel packs" 29 : 281-, 1991

      9 Garth RJN, "A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery" 108 : 564-, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (등재후보2차)
      2012-04-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한두개안면성형외과학회지 -> Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
      외국어명 : Journal of the korean cleft palate-craniofacial association -> Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
      KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.08 0.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.11 0.398 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼