RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      환영과 현실의 경계에 서다 -<비엘로폴, 비엘로폴>을 중심으로 본 타데우즈 칸토르의 연극 미학 = Representation and Re-presentation in the Theatre of Tadeusz Kantor

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101745949

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      An on-going creative process was the major principle of Kantor‘s artistic endeavors. Kantor‘s emphasis on process grew out of his frustration with the experience of creation being isolated from the audience in the present time, during the moments of encounter. At the same time, however, Kantor was always aware of the fact that the first night of each and every performance that he made was the last point of his creative intervention. Despite being performed live in the present time, Kantor saw theatre essentially as an end product. This does not mean that Kantor abandoned the concept of on-going process, for process was for the artist a means to reject the idea of a finished work of art and to denounce the feeling of satisfaction derived from the traditional denouement in representational theatre. For him, theatre that dominated his time isolated the audience from the art work and the artist, and from this perspective his continual emphasis on process should be understood as an aesthetic principle in order to open up and expand the dimension of art into the realm of the spectator so that the experiences of both the artist and spectator may coexist. The heaviest barrier that separated the artist and his work from its audience was the creative structure that governed Western art. In theatre it was the dramatic structure that was the main object of his series of severe challenges. Not only did it fail to represent reality but it distorted reality, creating nothing but artificial illusion. Under this condition, all that was permitted to the audience was mirages. However, Kantor never completely discarded illusion from his theatre. The point for him was always to created a circumstance where the illusory reality of drama comes to exist within the dimensions of our reality. It was Kantor‘s belief that instead of a total denial of illusion, his theatre should strategically accommodate illusion which comes from reality. And, the aim of Kantor‘s theatrical experiments was to invite the audience into this ambience and transform the experience of his audience into a much more participatory one. This paper traces the ways in which Kantor transgressed the dominating conventions of representational, literary theatre, and how such attempts induced an alternative mode of spectatorship. The study will begin from an investigation into Kantor‘s attitude towards illusion and reality, and then move onto a closer inspection of how he spatially and dramaturgically materialized his concepts on stage, giving special focus on Wielopole, Wielopole.
      번역하기

      An on-going creative process was the major principle of Kantor‘s artistic endeavors. Kantor‘s emphasis on process grew out of his frustration with the experience of creation being isolated from the audience in the present time, during the moments ...

      An on-going creative process was the major principle of Kantor‘s artistic endeavors. Kantor‘s emphasis on process grew out of his frustration with the experience of creation being isolated from the audience in the present time, during the moments of encounter. At the same time, however, Kantor was always aware of the fact that the first night of each and every performance that he made was the last point of his creative intervention. Despite being performed live in the present time, Kantor saw theatre essentially as an end product. This does not mean that Kantor abandoned the concept of on-going process, for process was for the artist a means to reject the idea of a finished work of art and to denounce the feeling of satisfaction derived from the traditional denouement in representational theatre. For him, theatre that dominated his time isolated the audience from the art work and the artist, and from this perspective his continual emphasis on process should be understood as an aesthetic principle in order to open up and expand the dimension of art into the realm of the spectator so that the experiences of both the artist and spectator may coexist. The heaviest barrier that separated the artist and his work from its audience was the creative structure that governed Western art. In theatre it was the dramatic structure that was the main object of his series of severe challenges. Not only did it fail to represent reality but it distorted reality, creating nothing but artificial illusion. Under this condition, all that was permitted to the audience was mirages. However, Kantor never completely discarded illusion from his theatre. The point for him was always to created a circumstance where the illusory reality of drama comes to exist within the dimensions of our reality. It was Kantor‘s belief that instead of a total denial of illusion, his theatre should strategically accommodate illusion which comes from reality. And, the aim of Kantor‘s theatrical experiments was to invite the audience into this ambience and transform the experience of his audience into a much more participatory one. This paper traces the ways in which Kantor transgressed the dominating conventions of representational, literary theatre, and how such attempts induced an alternative mode of spectatorship. The study will begin from an investigation into Kantor‘s attitude towards illusion and reality, and then move onto a closer inspection of how he spatially and dramaturgically materialized his concepts on stage, giving special focus on Wielopole, Wielopole.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 플라톤, "플라톤의 국가(政體)" 서광사 2005

      2 수전 손탁, "사진에 관하여" 시울 2005

      3 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물 : 인문과학의 고고학" 민음사 1995

      4 Kantor, Tadeusz, "Wielopole/Wielopole: An Exercise in Theatre" Marion Boyars 1990

      5 Tadeusz Kantor, "Wielopole, Wielopole"

      6 Marek Lachowicz, "Today is Your Birthday Again"

      7 Féral, Josette, "Theatricality: The Specificity of Theatrical Language" 31 (31): 94-108, 2002

      8 Davis, Tracy C., "Theatricality: An Introduction, In Theatricality" Cambridge University Press 1-39, 2003

      9 Kobialka, Michal, "The Quest for the Self: Thresholds and Transformations, In A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 269-310, 1993

      10 Kobialka, Michal, "The Quest for the Other: Space/Memory, In A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 311-364, 1993

      1 플라톤, "플라톤의 국가(政體)" 서광사 2005

      2 수전 손탁, "사진에 관하여" 시울 2005

      3 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물 : 인문과학의 고고학" 민음사 1995

      4 Kantor, Tadeusz, "Wielopole/Wielopole: An Exercise in Theatre" Marion Boyars 1990

      5 Tadeusz Kantor, "Wielopole, Wielopole"

      6 Marek Lachowicz, "Today is Your Birthday Again"

      7 Féral, Josette, "Theatricality: The Specificity of Theatrical Language" 31 (31): 94-108, 2002

      8 Davis, Tracy C., "Theatricality: An Introduction, In Theatricality" Cambridge University Press 1-39, 2003

      9 Kobialka, Michal, "The Quest for the Self: Thresholds and Transformations, In A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 269-310, 1993

      10 Kobialka, Michal, "The Quest for the Other: Space/Memory, In A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 311-364, 1993

      11 Kantor, Tadeusz, "Texts, Essays, and Intimate Commentaries" 16 (16): 19-45, 1994

      12 Klossowicz, Jan, "Tadeusz Kantor’s Journey" 30 : 98-113, 1986

      13 Fischer-Lichte, Erika, "Reality and Fiction in Contemporary Theatre, In Fictional Realites / Real Fictions: Contemporary Theatre in Search of a New Mimetic Paradigm" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 13-28, 2007

      14 Andrzej Sapija, "Powrót Odysa: Taduesza Kantor Notatki z Prób (Return of Odysseus: Tadeusz Kantor’s Notes from Rehearsals)"

      15 Foucault, Michel, "Of Other Spaces" 16 (16): 22-27, 1986

      16 Gebauer, Gunter, "Mimesis: Culture, Art, Society" University of California Press 1995

      17 Lawson, Thomas, "Last Exit: Painting, In Art after Modernism: Rethinking Representation" New Museum of Contemporary Art in association with Godine 153-165, 1984

      18 Andrzej Sapija, "Kantor"

      19 Golub, Spencer, "Infinity (Stage)" University of Michigan Press 1999

      20 Kobialka, Michal, "Found Reality, In A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 365-386, 1993

      21 Miklaszewski, Krzysztof, "Encounters with Tadeusz Kantor" Routledge 2005

      22 "Cricot 2 Theatre 1955ㆍ1988. Cracow: Centre of Cricot 2 Theatre, n.d. n. pag. Pamphlet"

      23 Kantor, Tadeusz, "A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990" University of California Press 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-07-05 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국연극학
      외국어명 : Journal of Korean Theatre Studies Association
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.34 0.825 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼