국가적 토지소유론에 대한 이론적 비판(2) : < 주호협호 > 관계와 공동체에 관한 문제를 중심으로 Focused on the relation of < Juho-Hyupho > and Comuni = A Critique on the Theory of State-Land Ownership(2)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Lee's empirical studies is based upon concepts of 'state-ownership of land' and $lt;Juho(landlord)-Hyupho (peasant)$gt;. I argue that this framework lacks theoretidal scrutiny, leading to confusion in understanding his key assertions.
When we isolate only $lt;Juho-Hyupho$gt; from his arguments. there seems to be not much difference between him and his opponents. But his central emphasis on 'state-ownership of land' does not match $lt;Juho-Hyupho$gt;. He does not pay enough attention to the importance of community which can play a vital role in linking 'state-ownership of land' and $lt;Juho-Hyupho$gt;
As a conclusion, he starts from criticizing the feudalistic approach (based on private ownership of land). underestimation of the role of the state. But in his assertion overemphasized the role of the state, he has too much attention to 'state-ownership of land', and ignorance of many facets of $lt;Juho-Hyupho$gt;.