Based on analysis on previous tax appeals cases, this study classifies taxpayers’ behaviors which fall into “fraud and other illegal activities”. Those behaviors include drawing up fake contracts, double bookkeeping for tax evasion, failing to i...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Based on analysis on previous tax appeals cases, this study classifies taxpayers’ behaviors which fall into “fraud and other illegal activities”. Those behaviors include drawing up fake contracts, double bookkeeping for tax evasion, failing to i...
Based on analysis on previous tax appeals cases, this study classifies taxpayers’ behaviors which fall into “fraud and other illegal activities”. Those behaviors include drawing up fake contracts, double bookkeeping for tax evasion, failing to issue tax invoices or receiving sham tax invoices, premise title trust or business under an alias, imper- sonated money transactions for tax evasion, reporting underestimated revenues or overestimated expenses, and unregistered resale of real estates.
Furthermore, this study classifies tax authority’s possible successive tax enforcements during the special tax imposition exclusion period after tax court’s judgements. Those successive tax enforcements include tax imposition on different taxpayers, tax imposition based on different tax requisitions, imposition of capital gains tax instead of donation tax on conditional donation, retroactive tax imposition onto years when tax imposition exclusion period is expired, tax imposition on taxpayers’ spouse in case joint tax imposition on married couple is repealed, and redelivery of tax papers in case first tax papers are not delivered to taxpayers.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 소순무, "조세소송" 영화조세통람 2008
2 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2007
3 "삼일아이닷컴"
4 국세청, "법무심사편람" 2004
5 "대법원 종합법률정보 서비스"
6 "국세법령정보시스템"
1 소순무, "조세소송" 영화조세통람 2008
2 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2007
3 "삼일아이닷컴"
4 국세청, "법무심사편람" 2004
5 "대법원 종합법률정보 서비스"
6 "국세법령정보시스템"
회사의 동일성, 채무면탈 목적과 법인격부인론의 적용 -대법원 2010.1.14. 선고 2009다77327 판결-
해상유류오염손해배상체계에서 STOPIA, TOPIA 협정에 관한 연구 -내용과 국내도입여부를 중심으로-
공정거래위원회에 의한 사전심사청구제도의 현황 및 개선방안
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2017-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.667 | 0.39 |