RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선후기 ‘永作宮屯’ 궁장토의 구조와 창원 모델 = The Formation of Eternal Cultivation Royal Land and the Model Case of Changwon County in the Late Joseon Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104864276

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the late Joseon Dynasty, among the royal lands which did not have clear ownership, there were two types. One was levied 100 dus(斗) of rough rice on each gyeol(結) while the other was 200 dus. ‘Rough rice 200 dus type royal land’ was formed by modeling ‘Yongdong-gung’(龍洞宮) royal land in Changwon County, Gyeongsang Province which was bestowed by the king in the middle of 17th century, and called ‘Yeongjakgungdun’ [Eternal Cultivation Royal Land, 永作宮屯]. Since then, ‘Rough rice 200 dus type royal land’, ‘Yeongjakgungdun’ was regarded as a standard of farm rent rate.
      This paper is to examine the formation of Yongdong-gung(龍洞宮) royal land in Changwon County, farm rent rate and the actual management of that land, and the condition of tenants’ farming which could be viewed by analyzing land registers(量案). Especially, this paper clearly argues that ‘Rough rice 200 dus’ was not levied to the whole area of that royal lands, rather, it was applied only to the actually cultivated area in which devastated and disaster area were not included. 100 dus of 200 dus of rough rice was land tax and the rest 100 dus was the farm rent. This low farm rent rate means that the tenants were permitted to retain considerable rights in terms of land ownership. However, despite the resist and lawsuit, the tenants’ bid for ownership and the right for farming was disregarded. Despite the process of readjustment with the royal land based on the thought of modern landownership system formed since the Kabo Reform(1894), the tenants’ bid for ownership was not admitted. Hence, the Yongdong-gung royal land was at last vested into the government land. ‘200 dus type royal lands’ were quite different from ‘100 dus type royal lands’ which the tenants’ bid for ownership could be obtained by constant resists and lawsuits.
      번역하기

      In the late Joseon Dynasty, among the royal lands which did not have clear ownership, there were two types. One was levied 100 dus(斗) of rough rice on each gyeol(結) while the other was 200 dus. ‘Rough rice 200 dus type royal land’ was formed b...

      In the late Joseon Dynasty, among the royal lands which did not have clear ownership, there were two types. One was levied 100 dus(斗) of rough rice on each gyeol(結) while the other was 200 dus. ‘Rough rice 200 dus type royal land’ was formed by modeling ‘Yongdong-gung’(龍洞宮) royal land in Changwon County, Gyeongsang Province which was bestowed by the king in the middle of 17th century, and called ‘Yeongjakgungdun’ [Eternal Cultivation Royal Land, 永作宮屯]. Since then, ‘Rough rice 200 dus type royal land’, ‘Yeongjakgungdun’ was regarded as a standard of farm rent rate.
      This paper is to examine the formation of Yongdong-gung(龍洞宮) royal land in Changwon County, farm rent rate and the actual management of that land, and the condition of tenants’ farming which could be viewed by analyzing land registers(量案). Especially, this paper clearly argues that ‘Rough rice 200 dus’ was not levied to the whole area of that royal lands, rather, it was applied only to the actually cultivated area in which devastated and disaster area were not included. 100 dus of 200 dus of rough rice was land tax and the rest 100 dus was the farm rent. This low farm rent rate means that the tenants were permitted to retain considerable rights in terms of land ownership. However, despite the resist and lawsuit, the tenants’ bid for ownership and the right for farming was disregarded. Despite the process of readjustment with the royal land based on the thought of modern landownership system formed since the Kabo Reform(1894), the tenants’ bid for ownership was not admitted. Hence, the Yongdong-gung royal land was at last vested into the government land. ‘200 dus type royal lands’ were quite different from ‘100 dus type royal lands’ which the tenants’ bid for ownership could be obtained by constant resists and lawsuits.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "龍洞宮謄錄"

      2 "龍洞宮捧上冊" 1825

      3 "龍洞宮捧上井間冊"

      4 오인택, "조선후기의 양안과 토지문서" 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반 2008

      5 이영훈, "조선후기사회경제사" 한길사 1988

      6 이영호, "조선토지조사사업에서 국유지의 조사와 활용" 한국역사연구회 (65) : 351-382, 2007

      7 이영호, "근대전환기 궁장토 소유권의 향방 : 경상도 창원 龍洞宮田畓 ‘永作宮屯=租200斗型’의 사례" 한국학연구소 (24) : 145-179, 2011

      8 오인택, "경자양전의 시행조직과 양안의 기재형식" 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반 2008

      9 "續大典"

      10 "版籍司謄錄"

      1 "龍洞宮謄錄"

      2 "龍洞宮捧上冊" 1825

      3 "龍洞宮捧上井間冊"

      4 오인택, "조선후기의 양안과 토지문서" 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반 2008

      5 이영훈, "조선후기사회경제사" 한길사 1988

      6 이영호, "조선토지조사사업에서 국유지의 조사와 활용" 한국역사연구회 (65) : 351-382, 2007

      7 이영호, "근대전환기 궁장토 소유권의 향방 : 경상도 창원 龍洞宮田畓 ‘永作宮屯=租200斗型’의 사례" 한국학연구소 (24) : 145-179, 2011

      8 오인택, "경자양전의 시행조직과 양안의 기재형식" 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반 2008

      9 "續大典"

      10 "版籍司謄錄"

      11 安秉珆, "朝鮮近代經濟史硏究" 日本評論社 1975

      12 "昌原府龍洞宮屯田畓灾陳物故作者石數懸錄成冊" 1671

      13 "昌原府所在龍洞宮田畓改量成冊" 1791

      14 "昌原府所在龍洞宮屯田畓收稅穀物數成冊"

      15 "承政院日記"

      16 "慶尙道昌原府所在龍洞宮田畓改打量成冊"

      17 "慶尙道昌原府所在龍洞宮田畓庚子量案" 1722

      18 "慶尙道昌原府所在龍洞宮屯田畓落漏處及陳還起加耕庫員改打量成冊" 1693

      19 "慶尙南道昌原郡所在庄土柳聖杓提出圖書類, In 경상도장토문적"

      20 "慶尙南道昌原郡各面公土成冊" 1904

      21 "忠勳府謄錄"

      22 "導掌決定原案 제6호" 임시재산정리국

      23 "內需司庄土文績"

      24 "內需司及各宮房田畓總結與奴婢總 都案" 1787

      25 박준성, "17ㆍ18세기 궁방전의 확대와 소유형태의 변화" 11 : 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-12-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 지역과역사 -> 지역과 역사 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.74 1.558 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼