RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      식민주의 사학의 한국고대사 연구에 대한 최근의 비판적 검토 = Revisiting the Japanese Colonialism from the Perspective of Ancient History of Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60072877

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This review examines the recent research movements in the study of Japanese colonialism from the perspective of ancient history of Korea. Recently, scholars have increasingly critically examined the Japanese colonial historiography and its historical perspectives on the ancient history of Korea. This increase can be attributed to two factors. One is exogenous, China’s Northeast Asian Project(東北工程), while the other is endogenously developed post-colonialism.
      The Northeast Asian Project has led the Korean historians to re-examine the history of Manchuria-Korea(滿鮮史), through which they could critique the groundlessness of the Project and reflect upon the structure and nature of Korean ancient history. Such a reflection, however, has been already present in the efforts to reconsider colonialism within the discipline. In particular, I note the self-reflection upon the modernity in nationalism that has arisen from the perspective of post-colonialism. This allowed the study of Korean ancient history to recognize the underlying nature of the study of modern history and to acknowledge the limits of national history. Unfortunately, there has been a lack of alternative framework of history so far that can plausibly replace the existing national history. The recent research trends, however, have important values to offer, including its efforts to re-examine colonialism as well as to search for new perspectives and methods.
      번역하기

      This review examines the recent research movements in the study of Japanese colonialism from the perspective of ancient history of Korea. Recently, scholars have increasingly critically examined the Japanese colonial historiography and its historical ...

      This review examines the recent research movements in the study of Japanese colonialism from the perspective of ancient history of Korea. Recently, scholars have increasingly critically examined the Japanese colonial historiography and its historical perspectives on the ancient history of Korea. This increase can be attributed to two factors. One is exogenous, China’s Northeast Asian Project(東北工程), while the other is endogenously developed post-colonialism.
      The Northeast Asian Project has led the Korean historians to re-examine the history of Manchuria-Korea(滿鮮史), through which they could critique the groundlessness of the Project and reflect upon the structure and nature of Korean ancient history. Such a reflection, however, has been already present in the efforts to reconsider colonialism within the discipline. In particular, I note the self-reflection upon the modernity in nationalism that has arisen from the perspective of post-colonialism. This allowed the study of Korean ancient history to recognize the underlying nature of the study of modern history and to acknowledge the limits of national history. Unfortunately, there has been a lack of alternative framework of history so far that can plausibly replace the existing national history. The recent research trends, however, have important values to offer, including its efforts to re-examine colonialism as well as to search for new perspectives and methods.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 동북공정과 만선사관의 재검토
      • 2. 연구사적 반성과 식민주의의 재인식
      • 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      • 머리말
      • 1. 동북공정과 만선사관의 재검토
      • 2. 연구사적 반성과 식민주의의 재인식
      • 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼