RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전병훈 연구의 문제와 쟁점(1) -최근 논쟁에서의 몇가지 문제를 중심으로- = Problems and Issues on the Jeon Byeonghun Research(1) -Around the Recent Controversies and Research Ethics-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100400504

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This research reviews the issues in researching the philosophy by Jeon Byeonghun, a reputable scholar and expert of late-Joseon, active in China and discusses the recommended direction the research field must take moving forward for its research ethics. Many of the research literature he left in his dynamic life in the turbulent modern times have lost its original form or disappeared. The act of collecting, organizing, and analyzing the segmented literature without its original context is not easy. Dojinsuon (道眞粹言) said to be written by Jeon Byeonghun only maintains its title, however, has not surfaced anywhere. I have discovered the writings by Jeon Byeonghun from Sunbulgajinsuorok (仙佛家眞粹語錄) and has historically researched its relation with this writing. I have also done some historical research on his life and Chinese poetry, which have not been widely understood. In this research I review the recently suggested criticism and suggest the necessity of accurate quotations of the previous researches along with the problems in the Jeon Byeonghun research. In particular, in the case of Jeon Byeonghun, as there is no solid compilation of the original data, it poses risks related to misinterpretation and misunderstanding, and it is inevitable that scholars have different opinions in interpretation. When discussing and evaluating researched previously done, it is crucial to keep this in mind and have aneutral, objective perspective with accurate citation. Recently in our society, plagiarism is an important issue. Among these issues, the necessary point to be considered in our academia is not such technical plagiarism, but rather plagiarism that is not too obvious or idea copying. These are the area where people must rely on subjective opinions or that may cause mutual arguments, in turn fundamentally related to research ethics. In this light, the research must not be lazy in establishing his/her own opinions, as well as be hostile against the evaluation and citation of previously-done researches that support him/her.
      번역하기

      This research reviews the issues in researching the philosophy by Jeon Byeonghun, a reputable scholar and expert of late-Joseon, active in China and discusses the recommended direction the research field must take moving forward for its research ethic...

      This research reviews the issues in researching the philosophy by Jeon Byeonghun, a reputable scholar and expert of late-Joseon, active in China and discusses the recommended direction the research field must take moving forward for its research ethics. Many of the research literature he left in his dynamic life in the turbulent modern times have lost its original form or disappeared. The act of collecting, organizing, and analyzing the segmented literature without its original context is not easy. Dojinsuon (道眞粹言) said to be written by Jeon Byeonghun only maintains its title, however, has not surfaced anywhere. I have discovered the writings by Jeon Byeonghun from Sunbulgajinsuorok (仙佛家眞粹語錄) and has historically researched its relation with this writing. I have also done some historical research on his life and Chinese poetry, which have not been widely understood. In this research I review the recently suggested criticism and suggest the necessity of accurate quotations of the previous researches along with the problems in the Jeon Byeonghun research. In particular, in the case of Jeon Byeonghun, as there is no solid compilation of the original data, it poses risks related to misinterpretation and misunderstanding, and it is inevitable that scholars have different opinions in interpretation. When discussing and evaluating researched previously done, it is crucial to keep this in mind and have aneutral, objective perspective with accurate citation. Recently in our society, plagiarism is an important issue. Among these issues, the necessary point to be considered in our academia is not such technical plagiarism, but rather plagiarism that is not too obvious or idea copying. These are the area where people must rely on subjective opinions or that may cause mutual arguments, in turn fundamentally related to research ethics. In this light, the research must not be lazy in establishing his/her own opinions, as well as be hostile against the evaluation and citation of previously-done researches that support him/her.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 금장태, "한국 근대사상의 도전" 전통문화연구회 1995

      2 "학술적 글쓰기에서의 표절문제와 인용방법"

      3 황광욱, "천부경의 전래에 관한 일고찰" (2) : 1992

      4 금장태, "정신철학통편" 명문당 1983

      5 황광욱, "전병훈의 생애와 사상" (37) : 1997

      6 임채우, "전병훈의 미공개 자료 연구" 한국동서철학회 (39) : 137-155, 2006

      7 "신증동국여지승람"

      8 일붕, "선불가진수어록" 영진상사 1978

      9 황광욱, "서우 전병훈의 생애와 사상" 한국철학사연구회 (4) : 1995

      10 금장태, "서우 전병훈의 사상" 15 : 1992

      1 금장태, "한국 근대사상의 도전" 전통문화연구회 1995

      2 "학술적 글쓰기에서의 표절문제와 인용방법"

      3 황광욱, "천부경의 전래에 관한 일고찰" (2) : 1992

      4 금장태, "정신철학통편" 명문당 1983

      5 황광욱, "전병훈의 생애와 사상" (37) : 1997

      6 임채우, "전병훈의 미공개 자료 연구" 한국동서철학회 (39) : 137-155, 2006

      7 "신증동국여지승람"

      8 일붕, "선불가진수어록" 영진상사 1978

      9 황광욱, "서우 전병훈의 생애와 사상" 한국철학사연구회 (4) : 1995

      10 금장태, "서우 전병훈의 사상" 15 : 1992

      11 윤창대, "서우 전병훈의 『정신철학통편』 번역 연구: 정신철학 통편중의 정신사상을 중심으로" 원광대학교 동양학대학원 2003

      12 윤창대, "서우 전병훈의 『정신철학통편』 번역 연구: 정신철학 통편중의 정신사상을 중심으로" 원광대학교 동양학대학원 2003

      13 박종홍, "박종홍전집5" 민음사 1982

      14 "금문수서첩(간찰첩)"

      15 全氏大同譜, "羅城派 제5권" 전씨대동종약소 1991

      16 금장태, "續儒學近百年" 여강출판사 1989

      17 임채우, "全秉薰의 <道眞粹言>과 暘星의 <仙佛家眞修語錄>의 관계에 관한 연구 -전병훈의 도교 자료 발굴을 겸하여-" 철학연구회 (73) : 149-163, 2006

      18 "全氏總譜總錄" 전씨대동종약소 1931

      19 "全氏總譜" 전씨대동종약소 1931

      20 "全氏宗約彙報" 전씨대동종약소 1918

      21 "全氏宗史要覽" 전씨중앙종친회 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-05-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 仙道文化 제6집 -> 仙道文化 KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2007-04-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 선도문화연구원 -> 국학연구원
      영문명 : Korean Sundo Culture Institute -> kukhak Institute
      2006-11-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute for Korea Sundo & Culture -> Korean Sundo Culture Institute
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.36 0.36 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.42 0.996 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼