RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      숙종 때의 성균관 대사성 자질 논란 고찰 = President of Sungkyunkwan qualities Review of controversy when Sukjong

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101965434

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In general, the Joseon Dynasty and the highest quality educational institutions might be that it is the teacher of the president and general manager of Sungkyunkwan a virtue, will evenly with here was a person of academic skills and leadership. But nearly 46 years Sukjong was reigning president to replace the 100 as viewed sometimes limited, which is a problem in that the average person did not work only five and a half months or so, despite the long-term nature of the institution should be served Sungkyunkwan education and administration was also a common meaning. In any event, Sungkyunkwan General be appointed to that position or stay in a lot of other reasons such person who was embroiled in controversy are reached only about 5 or so look at the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. Min Jong-Do, Oh Do-Il, Lee-Don, Kim Jin-kyu, Yun Sung-Jun was like those people, Min Jong-Do was many things would not have trouble properly, as well as privacy and also very disorderly, Oh Do-Il Caused a lot of students was strong partisanship and conflict, Lee Don was a courtier, Kim Jin-kyu has caused the students to intolerance and conflict, as well as Yun Sung-Jun also to do something unnatural to exclude students who caused a lot of students and conflict. Students who do not love their masters, even though President Sungkyunkwan Thus, model and was caused by work being rejected by any far, bigoted treatment. General Sungkyunkwan I should have learned thoroughly the various business processes as well as age, virtue, character, leadership, and so on as head of aunique top higher education institutions, expectation and reality is otherwise rather just eat opprobrium as research recognized or seen as a passing place people frequently is one to think deeply as it is very disappointing.
      번역하기

      In general, the Joseon Dynasty and the highest quality educational institutions might be that it is the teacher of the president and general manager of Sungkyunkwan a virtue, will evenly with here was a person of academic skills and leadership. But ne...

      In general, the Joseon Dynasty and the highest quality educational institutions might be that it is the teacher of the president and general manager of Sungkyunkwan a virtue, will evenly with here was a person of academic skills and leadership. But nearly 46 years Sukjong was reigning president to replace the 100 as viewed sometimes limited, which is a problem in that the average person did not work only five and a half months or so, despite the long-term nature of the institution should be served Sungkyunkwan education and administration was also a common meaning. In any event, Sungkyunkwan General be appointed to that position or stay in a lot of other reasons such person who was embroiled in controversy are reached only about 5 or so look at the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. Min Jong-Do, Oh Do-Il, Lee-Don, Kim Jin-kyu, Yun Sung-Jun was like those people, Min Jong-Do was many things would not have trouble properly, as well as privacy and also very disorderly, Oh Do-Il Caused a lot of students was strong partisanship and conflict, Lee Don was a courtier, Kim Jin-kyu has caused the students to intolerance and conflict, as well as Yun Sung-Jun also to do something unnatural to exclude students who caused a lot of students and conflict. Students who do not love their masters, even though President Sungkyunkwan Thus, model and was caused by work being rejected by any far, bigoted treatment. General Sungkyunkwan I should have learned thoroughly the various business processes as well as age, virtue, character, leadership, and so on as head of aunique top higher education institutions, expectation and reality is otherwise rather just eat opprobrium as research recognized or seen as a passing place people frequently is one to think deeply as it is very disappointing.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "현종실록(世宗實錄)"

      2 "해동잡록(海東雜錄)"

      3 "해동방목(海東榜目)"

      4 "해동명신록(海東名臣錄)"

      5 "중종실록(中宗實錄)"

      6 "조선금석총람(朝鮮金石總覽)"

      7 "인조실록(仁祖實錄)"

      8 "용재총화(慵齋叢話)"

      9 "예종실록(睿宗室錄)"

      10 "영조실록(英祖實錄)"

      1 "현종실록(世宗實錄)"

      2 "해동잡록(海東雜錄)"

      3 "해동방목(海東榜目)"

      4 "해동명신록(海東名臣錄)"

      5 "중종실록(中宗實錄)"

      6 "조선금석총람(朝鮮金石總覽)"

      7 "인조실록(仁祖實錄)"

      8 "용재총화(慵齋叢話)"

      9 "예종실록(睿宗室錄)"

      10 "영조실록(英祖實錄)"

      11 "연산군일기(燕山君日記)"

      12 "연려실기술(燃藜室記述)"

      13 "여문집성(儷文集成)"

      14 "신증동국여지승람(新增東國輿地勝覽)"

      15 "승정원일기(承政院日記)"

      16 "숙종실록(肅宗實錄)"

      17 "성균관대학교 육백년사"

      18 "반중잡영(泮中雜詠)"

      19 "명종실록(明宗實錄)"

      20 장재천, "대사성까지 역임한 성균관의 우수 교관 사례" 한국사상문화학회 (77) : 149-169, 2015

      21 "대동운부군옥(大東韻府群玉)"

      22 "국조인물지(國朝人物志)"

      23 "국조방목(國朝榜目)"

      24 "경종실록(景宗實錄)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.38 0.811 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼