소화성 궤양 천공의 복강경하 일차 봉합술과 개복 일차 봉합술의 비교 = Laparoscopic versus Open Primary Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: Simple closure, regardless of using an omental patch, continues to be the preferred option for many surgeons. It is a easy, quick and safe operation, and it can be applied to all situations by every surgeon. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of routinely using laparoscopic repair for treating perforated peptic ulcer. Methods: A retrospective review was carried out on 68 consecutive patients who underwent patch repair for a perforated peptic ulcer; 11 underwent laparoscopic repair and 57 underwent open repair. Laparoscopic repair was performed by one surgeon at the same hospital between March, 2006 and February, 2009. Both groups were compared according to the Mann-Whitney U-test. A p value＜0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Statistical significance (p＜0.05) between two groups (laparoscopic vs. open) was present regarding to the postoperative morbidity (0 vs. 16 cases, respectively), the hospital stay (4.8 vs. 12.7 days, respectively), the postoperative day of resuming an oral diet (3 vs. 5.7 days, respectively). The mean operative time of laparoscopic repair (78 minutes) was shorter than that of open repair (82 minutes) but this was not statistically significant (p=0.81). We excluded using a pain scale or assessing the use of analgesics in this study because of the popularity of IV PCA (intravenous patient-controlled analgesia). Conclusion: Laparoscopic primary repair is a safe emergency procedure for treating perforated peptic ulcer patients.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정규영, "소화성 궤양 천공에서 복강경하 일차 봉합술과 개복술의 비교 연구" 대한외과학회 64 (64): 219-223, 2003

2 Svanes C, "Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment and prognosis" 24 : 277-, 2000

3 Tate J, "Sutureless laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer" 80 : 235-, 1993

4 Martin R, "Surgical management of ulcer disease" 85 : 907-929, 2005

5 Donovan A, "Selective treatment of duodenal ulcer with perforation" 189 : 627-636, 1979

6 Noguiera C, "Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality" 27 : 782-787, 2003

7 Hermansson M, "Peptic ulcer perforation before and after the introduction of H2 receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors" 32 : 523-529, 1997

8 Bergamaschi R, "Open vs laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer" 13 : 679-682, 1999

9 Mouret P, "Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer" 77 : 1006-1009, 1990

10 Druart M, "Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial" 11 : 1017-1020, 1997

11 Lau W, "Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer" 82 : 814-816, 1995

12 Katkhouda N, "Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers" 134 : 845-850, 1999

13 Matsuda M, "Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer" 221 : 236-240, 1995

14 Miserez M, "Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer" 10 : 831-836, 1996

15 Lau WY, "History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers" 21 : 890-896, 1997

16 Ng EK, "Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation" 231 : 153-158, 2000

17 Lunevicius R, "Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers" 19 : 1565-1571, 2005

18 Seelng M, "Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers" 37 : 226-229, 2003

19 Reinbach D, "Acute perforated duodenal ulcer is not associated with Helicobacter pylori infection" 34 : 1344-1347, 1993

20 Crofts T, "A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer" 320 : 970-973, 1989

21 Lau W, "A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique" 224 : 131-138, 1996

22 Kim RM, "A clinical review of laparoscopic primary closure for treating peptic ulcer" 11 : 77-80, 2008