한계농지의 효율적 이용방안에 관한 연구 = (A) study on the improvement for the efficient use of submarginal farmland in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The government attempts to improve the availability of marginal farmland by attracting urban capital to idle resources, such as land and houses, in rural areas and turning unoccupied houses and marginal land into recreational facilities, further activating experience & stay-type tourist projects regarding guest houses, pensions and recreational forests. However, the governmental deregulation measures to improve the usability of marginal farmland has been limited on individuals' possession and use far from the overall development of rural areas, while causing social problems like sprawling development instead. In other words, the development of marginal farmland scattered in agricultural, mountainous and fishing villages should be in harmony with the improvement of farmers and fishermen's welfare and the overall development of rural areas, but it has brought about temporary one-shot developments and the influx of a few urban residents.

Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act was originally established to allow and enhance the development of marginal farmland and its surrounding areas (Marginal farmland and so on - Section 18 of Article 2, Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act), but the effect of this act is still inadequate. Besides, although it has a legal support, this act has failed to develop the local economy, and rural residents has not effectively used the national land because of medium and large-sized individual marginal farmland development and rearrangement projects since the enactment of this act, and rearrangement district projects for individual marginal farmland and marginal farmland have been poorly conducted for the past 10 years.

Thus, this study aims to reestablish marginal farmland and its surrounding area-related concepts, such as marginal farmland, idle farmland, farmland in adverse farming conditions mingled in the present Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act and Agricultural Land Act, based on traditional theories of rent, and investigate if marginal farmland is efficiently used by substantially analyzing cases of medium and large-sized rearrangement district projects for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas, while seeking plans to efficiently use marginal farmland based on the results of this analysis.

As a result of examining the regional characteristics of rearrangement districts for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas, this study found out that out of all the lands designated and developed as marginal farmland and its surrounding areas, dry fields accounted for the majority, 52.9%. in terms of land category (the purpose of land), followed by paddy fields, 23.4%, which shows that dry fields and paddy fields (76.3% in total) are designated and developed as rearrangement districts for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas. The size of dry fields was largest in Gyeonggi Province, Gangwon Province and Gyeongbuk Province, and the size of paddy fields was largest in Chungbuk Province and Chungnam Province. However, it was found that several different land categories were mixed in Chungbuk Province and Jeonnam Pronvince.

In the characteristics of each type of districts designated as marginal farmland and its surrounding areas, this study discovered that dry fields and paddy fields are most used, similar to the regional characteristics. When marginal farmland was analyzed by type, it was found that dry fields and paddy fields overwhelmingly accounted for the majority, 97.7%. The size of paddy fields was largest for sport-type rearrangement districts, but the size of dry fields was more for the tour-type, residence-type and education-type rearrangement districts than that of paddy fields. Distinct characteristics of each region should be reflected on the development of marginal farmland because the characters of marginal farmland and regional circumstances are very important factors in utilizing marginal farmland. At present, there are some cases of rearrangement districts for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas that have been developed and operated fit for regional circumstances, but in many cases, such a district is developed not proper for regional circumstances, or its management and maintenance is not properly conducted although it is developed fit for regional circumstances.

In the most cases of developing rearrangement districts for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas, marginal farmland is developed into residential pension complexes. The problem is that there are not many developed districts that are still being operated at present because they are not connected to their surrounding tour complexes. Moreover, since the development of rearrangement districts for marginal farmland and its surrounding areas is conducted in rural areas only, facilities should be constructed to improve rural residents' lives, but in many cases, such facilities as golf courses and golf ranges as a matter of fact.

What we should pay attention most in developing marginal farmland is to preserve the amenity of rural areas. It is because the rural amenity is not only directly connected to rural residents' quality of life, but becomes an important resource for urban-rural exchanges like a rural tour. Even in the level of national land and environment preservation, such a development project should be led in an environment-friendly way to sustain the natural landscapes and rurality of rural areas. As a matter of course. it may take a long time to overcome perspectives valuing residents' life convenience more than the value of rural landscapes in the lack of life infrastructures, but such a development project may damage the natural landscapes and rurality of a rural area, further destroying its value as a tour resource, and in worse cases, the rural residents may lose their foundation of income. Therefore, this study judged that it is necessary to provide a system that can induce s

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 3
• 제3절 선행연구의 검토 7
• 제2장 한계농지의 개념 및 이론적 고찰 11
• 제1절 한계농지의 개념 11
• 1. 한계농지의 경제적 개념 11
• 2. 한계농지의 법적 개념 13
• 3. 한계농지의 개념 정리 20
• 제2절 한계농지 관련법의 변천 23
• 1. 농지제도의 변천 24
• 2. 한계농지 관련법의 변천 35
• 제3장 한계농지의 현황 및 개발관련 제도 46
• 제1절 한계농지의 현황 46
• 1. 한계농지 46
• 2. 영농여건불리농지 49
• 3. 유휴농지 52
• 제2절 한계농지의 개발관련 제도 54
• 1. 한계농지, 한계농지등 정비지구의 개발 54
• 2. 영농여건불리농지, 유휴농지의 전용 68
• 제4장 한계농지등 정비지구 개발사례 분석 72
• 제1절 한계농지등 정비지구 개요 72
• 제2절 한계농지등 정비지구 개발 사례분석 73
• 1. 한계농지등 정비지구 지역별 분류 74
• 2. 한계농지등 정비지구 유형별 분류 84
• 3. 분석 결과 91
• 제5장 한계농지의 현안문제와 효율적 이용방안 94
• 제1절 한계농지의 현안 문제 94
• 1. 농지의 기본이념 퇴색 94
• 2. 한계농지 개발 추진주체 및 절차의 불합리 96
• 3. 한계농지 정비사업 유형의 획일화 97
• 제2절 한계농지의 이용활성화 방안 100
• 1. 농어촌 복합산업화 지원을 위한 유휴자원으로 활용 100
• 2. 한계농지 관리와 추진주체의 일원화 102
• 3. 종합적인 농촌 계획안에서의 정비유형 활성화 106
• 제6장 결론 109
• 참고문헌 112
• 부록 116
• ABSTRACT 125