RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      日帝時代 京觀變化와 風水談論 = The Social Construction of Fengshui Landscapes and Discourses under the Japanese Colonialism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76396557

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper is an interpretive approach of spatial the colonial andscape constructed on the various spatial scales(capital, city, town, village, and even physical environment, etc.) under the Japanese Colonialism in the late 19th and the early 20th c...

      This paper is an interpretive approach of spatial the colonial
      andscape constructed on the various spatial scales(capital, city, town, village, and even physical environment, etc.) under the Japanese Colonialism in the late 19th and the early 20th centuries. We can identify that such landscape as a signifying system has something to do with fengshui as a spatial discourse. So, I try to understand the features of fengshui discourse and some kinds of meaning of the colonial landscape. For these goals, above all, I have to explore the theoretical basis for interpreting landscape and retheorizing fengshui which has been treated the Korean traditional location as theory for that time.
      When we study the landscape and place related to fengshui, we can not help being exposed to the possibility of focusing on the
      mysterious and fundamental side of fengshui related to jigi which has been introduced to the West as the earth energy and the mysterious force. But I emphasized 'the social construction of fengshui discourses,' reflecting the social relation or power relation. Moreover it needed to be situated as a code for
      constructing the landscape as a signifying system or a geographical text. Generally, the dominating power could make use of the physical landscape for 'naturalizing' the power relation through
      constructing discourses(code) or narratives and landscapes(text). Especially, as such landscape could be easily experienced by
      people whoever maintain the ordinary senses(like seeing, hearing, smelling, touching, etc.), its effect could be expected wider and more strategically than any other means.
      From the perspective of the social construction of landscape
      and fengshui discourse, I focused on the relation between the Japanese Imperialism as the dominating power and the Korean as the resistant power. Then I could identify a distinctive feature of fengshui discourse, classified into 'fengshui for resistance.' As Michel Foucault points out about power, the domination power itself
      always contains the resistance against such domination in itself. After all, fengshui for resistance by the Korean could be just a sort of facing to the domination by the Japanese Imperialism.
      By my case study on the village scale, I can also identify this kind of fengshui discourse. In this case, it must not be important whether villagers believed in the mysterious effect of fengshui landscapes or not, I think. In other words, we have to focus on the context that they wanted to show their will for resisting to the Japanese Imperialism through constructing their traditional landscapes and even the colonial landscapes as a signifying system with fengshui discourses. After all, I can identify the politics of landscape by villagers through the social construction of landscape and fengshui discourse under the Japanese Imperialism.

      Key words: landscape, meaning, text-code, social construction, fengshui, power relation(social relation).

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 경관과 풍수
      • 3. 일제시대의 풍수
      • 4. 풍수의 사회적 구성
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 경관과 풍수
      • 3. 일제시대의 풍수
      • 4. 풍수의 사회적 구성
      • 5. 맺음말
      • <주>
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-12-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국문화역사지리학회 -> 문화역사지리 KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.66 0.935 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼