RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    관습법의 현대적 의미

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104206220

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Modern Views of Customary Law

    Se-Hyuk Oh


    The highest courts in Korea dealt with very important cases of customary law in recent years, so customary law became the center of public interests. Customary law as original form of law holds a important position in a legal system. Legal scholars take customary law seriously because it is related to something fundamental in law. In particular, legal philosophers deal with issues about customary law, for example its nature, requirements/standards of its existence or disappearance, its validity traditionally.
    Customary laws come into existence spontaneously in a certain legal community. Customs shift into customary laws by acquisition of opinio necessitatis of members in the legal community. While customs are facts, customary laws are norms that have binding force to the members of the legal community.
    From the era of codification till now, however, the portion of customary laws in legal systems diminished in proportion to the strengthening of the government monopoly of legislation. Is customary law degraded into a useless thing in modern legal systems nowadays? Not. Customary laws make up for the weak point of statutes that remain fixed as soon as established. However full of statutes the whole world is, there are gaps in legal systems. And changes of the world will make gaps deeper and larger. Customary laws grow in gaps and fill up gaps. It is foolish to believe that customary laws can be removed from the law's empire.
    번역하기

    Modern Views of Customary Law Se-Hyuk Oh The highest courts in Korea dealt with very important cases of customary law in recent years, so customary law became the center of public interests. Customary law as original form of law holds a important p...

    Modern Views of Customary Law

    Se-Hyuk Oh


    The highest courts in Korea dealt with very important cases of customary law in recent years, so customary law became the center of public interests. Customary law as original form of law holds a important position in a legal system. Legal scholars take customary law seriously because it is related to something fundamental in law. In particular, legal philosophers deal with issues about customary law, for example its nature, requirements/standards of its existence or disappearance, its validity traditionally.
    Customary laws come into existence spontaneously in a certain legal community. Customs shift into customary laws by acquisition of opinio necessitatis of members in the legal community. While customs are facts, customary laws are norms that have binding force to the members of the legal community.
    From the era of codification till now, however, the portion of customary laws in legal systems diminished in proportion to the strengthening of the government monopoly of legislation. Is customary law degraded into a useless thing in modern legal systems nowadays? Not. Customary laws make up for the weak point of statutes that remain fixed as soon as established. However full of statutes the whole world is, there are gaps in legal systems. And changes of the world will make gaps deeper and larger. Customary laws grow in gaps and fill up gaps. It is foolish to believe that customary laws can be removed from the law's empire.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-05-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Philosophy -> Korean Journal of Legal Philosophy KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Philosophy KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.66 0.64 1.024 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼