RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCIE SCOPUS

      Diagnostic Value of Biopsy Techniques in Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: Percutaneous Needle Biopsy and Open Biopsy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104750116

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis.
      Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis. The etiologic diagnosis of the infectious spondylodiscitis was obtained by two methods. Of 57 cases, twenty-seven patients underwent open biopsy and thirty patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy including computed tomography(CT)-guided and fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration. All biopsies were performed by experienced two neurosurgeons and one interventional radiologist.
      Results: Of the 57 cases radiologically consistent with spinal infection, 29(50.9%) biopsy specimens resulted in positive cultures and 28(49.1%) returned negative cultures. According to the type of biopsy techniques, the culture-positive rate was higher(p=0.005) in the open biopsy group than the percutaneous needle biopsy group. 19(70.4%) of 27 biopsy specimens were positive in the open biopsy group, and 10(33.3%) of 30 biopsy specimens were positive in the percutaneous needle biopsy group. Furthermore, the open biopsy showed higher positive culture rate than the percutaneous needle biopsy in cases with administration of empirical antibiotics although there was no statistically significant(p=0.137).
      Conclusions: Open biopsy should be considered for administration of organism-specific antibiotics for the successful treat- ment when percutaneous needle yield negative result. Furthermore, empirical antibiotics should be delayed until results of cultures unless the patient is severely septic, critically ill, neutropenic or neurologically compromised.
      번역하기

      objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the ...

      objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis.
      Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis. The etiologic diagnosis of the infectious spondylodiscitis was obtained by two methods. Of 57 cases, twenty-seven patients underwent open biopsy and thirty patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy including computed tomography(CT)-guided and fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration. All biopsies were performed by experienced two neurosurgeons and one interventional radiologist.
      Results: Of the 57 cases radiologically consistent with spinal infection, 29(50.9%) biopsy specimens resulted in positive cultures and 28(49.1%) returned negative cultures. According to the type of biopsy techniques, the culture-positive rate was higher(p=0.005) in the open biopsy group than the percutaneous needle biopsy group. 19(70.4%) of 27 biopsy specimens were positive in the open biopsy group, and 10(33.3%) of 30 biopsy specimens were positive in the percutaneous needle biopsy group. Furthermore, the open biopsy showed higher positive culture rate than the percutaneous needle biopsy in cases with administration of empirical antibiotics although there was no statistically significant(p=0.137).
      Conclusions: Open biopsy should be considered for administration of organism-specific antibiotics for the successful treat- ment when percutaneous needle yield negative result. Furthermore, empirical antibiotics should be delayed until results of cultures unless the patient is severely septic, critically ill, neutropenic or neurologically compromised.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis.
      Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis. The etiologic diagnosis of the infectious spondylodiscitis was obtained by two methods. Of 57 cases, twenty-seven patients underwent open biopsy and thirty patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy including computed tomography(CT)-guided and fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration. All biopsies were performed by experienced two neurosurgeons and one interventional radiologist.
      Results: Of the 57 cases radiologically consistent with spinal infection, 29(50.9%) biopsy specimens resulted in positive cultures and 28(49.1%) returned negative cultures. According to the type of biopsy techniques, the culture-positive rate was higher(p=0.005) in the open biopsy group than the percutaneous needle biopsy group. 19(70.4%) of 27 biopsy specimens were positive in the open biopsy group, and 10(33.3%) of 30 biopsy specimens were positive in the percutaneous needle biopsy group. Furthermore, the open biopsy showed higher positive culture rate than the percutaneous needle biopsy in cases with administration of empirical antibiotics although there was no statistically significant(p=0.137).
      Conclusions: Open biopsy should be considered for administration of organism-specific antibiotics for the successful treat- ment when percutaneous needle yield negative result. Furthermore, empirical antibiotics should be delayed until results of cultures unless the patient is severely septic, critically ill, neutropenic or neurologically compromised.
      번역하기

      Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectivel...

      Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis.
      Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis. The etiologic diagnosis of the infectious spondylodiscitis was obtained by two methods. Of 57 cases, twenty-seven patients underwent open biopsy and thirty patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy including computed tomography(CT)-guided and fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration. All biopsies were performed by experienced two neurosurgeons and one interventional radiologist.
      Results: Of the 57 cases radiologically consistent with spinal infection, 29(50.9%) biopsy specimens resulted in positive cultures and 28(49.1%) returned negative cultures. According to the type of biopsy techniques, the culture-positive rate was higher(p=0.005) in the open biopsy group than the percutaneous needle biopsy group. 19(70.4%) of 27 biopsy specimens were positive in the open biopsy group, and 10(33.3%) of 30 biopsy specimens were positive in the percutaneous needle biopsy group. Furthermore, the open biopsy showed higher positive culture rate than the percutaneous needle biopsy in cases with administration of empirical antibiotics although there was no statistically significant(p=0.137).
      Conclusions: Open biopsy should be considered for administration of organism-specific antibiotics for the successful treat- ment when percutaneous needle yield negative result. Furthermore, empirical antibiotics should be delayed until results of cultures unless the patient is severely septic, critically ill, neutropenic or neurologically compromised.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hsu CY, "Unusual manifestations of vertebral osteomyelitis: intraosseous lesions mimicking metastases" 29 : 1104-1110, 2008

      2 Rankine JJ, "Therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in spinal infection" 80 : 607-609, 2004

      3 Nolla JM, "Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in nondrug users" 31 : 271-278, 2002

      4 Staatz G, "Spondylodiskitic abscesses: CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage" 208 : 363-367, 1998

      5 Asamoto S, "Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment" 64 : 103-108, 2005

      6 Maiuri F, "Spondylodiscitis - Clinical and magnetic resonance diagnosis" 22 : 1741-1746, 1997

      7 Govender S, "Spinal infections" 87 : 1454-1458, 2005

      8 An H, "Spinal Infections" 444 : 27-33, 2006

      9 Bonfiglio M, "Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Disk space infections" 96 : 234-247, 1973

      10 Perronne C, "Pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiskitis (vertebral osteomyelitis) in 80 adult patients" 19 : 746-750, 1994

      1 Hsu CY, "Unusual manifestations of vertebral osteomyelitis: intraosseous lesions mimicking metastases" 29 : 1104-1110, 2008

      2 Rankine JJ, "Therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in spinal infection" 80 : 607-609, 2004

      3 Nolla JM, "Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in nondrug users" 31 : 271-278, 2002

      4 Staatz G, "Spondylodiskitic abscesses: CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage" 208 : 363-367, 1998

      5 Asamoto S, "Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment" 64 : 103-108, 2005

      6 Maiuri F, "Spondylodiscitis - Clinical and magnetic resonance diagnosis" 22 : 1741-1746, 1997

      7 Govender S, "Spinal infections" 87 : 1454-1458, 2005

      8 An H, "Spinal Infections" 444 : 27-33, 2006

      9 Bonfiglio M, "Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Disk space infections" 96 : 234-247, 1973

      10 Perronne C, "Pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiskitis (vertebral osteomyelitis) in 80 adult patients" 19 : 746-750, 1994

      11 Hadjipavlou AG, "Percutaneous transpedicular discectomy and drainage in pyogenic spondylodiscitis" 13 : 707-713, 2004

      12 Haaker RG, "Percutaneous lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar discitis" 6 : 98-101, 1997

      13 Yang SC, "Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and drainage for infectious spondylitis" 31 : 367-373, 2007

      14 Cottle L, "Infectious spondylodiscitis" 56 : 401-412, 2008

      15 Fouquet B, "Infectious discitis diagnostic contribution of laboratory tests and percutaneous discovertebral biopsy" 63 : 24-29, 1996

      16 Krodel A, "Indications for and Results of Operative Treatment of Spondylitis and Spondylodiscitis" 110 : 78-82, 1991

      17 Yang SC, "Identifying pathogens of spondylodiscitis: percutaneous endoscopy or CTguided biopsy" 466 : 3086-3092, 2008

      18 Lam K, "Discitis" 65 : 280-286, 2004

      19 Chew FS, "Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous aspiration procedures in suspected spontaneous infectious diskitis" 218 : 211-214, 2001

      20 Sobottke R, "Current Diagnosis and Treatment of Spondylodiscitis" 105 : 181-, 2008

      21 Rezai AR, "Contemporary management of spinal osteomyelitis" 44 : 1018-1025, 1999

      22 Ito M, "Clinical outcome of posterolateral endoscopic surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis: results of 15 patients with serious comorbid conditions" 32 : 200-206, 2007

      23 Vinicoff PG, "CT-guided spinal biopsy in spondylodiscitis" 160 : 5931-5934, 1998

      24 Adapon BD, "CT-guided closed biopsy of the spine" 5 : 73-78, 1981

      25 Friedman RL, "A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears" 13 : 271-275, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한척추신경외과학회지 -> Neurospine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-09-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of spine -> Neurospine KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.411 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼