區分所有權의 所有權性 變質論 = Discussions on the Changing Nature of Condominium Ownership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Ownership refers to a right for property interests attributed exclusively to a party. For instance, as the assurance of freedom is a major concern of public law science in terms of relationships with national authorities, the assurance of ownership among citizens also takes a central position in private law science, and actually forms and develops its pivotal theories in real right.
Above all, as long as condominium ownership is concerned, it is most essential to focus on the nature of condominium ownership as a right, especially ‘the nature of its ownership aspects.’ That is, this is a concern on whether the legal principles of condominium ownership involve only those of ownership or other legal principles as well than ownership. And supposing that there is another legal principle apart from ownership on the condominium ownership, it is necessary to investigate a concern on whether its existence causes a change to the nature of ownership, and whether the ownership aspects of condominium ownership with its nature changed are ‘weakened’ or even ‘changed.’ These questions become a motivation for this study to seek to make further examination into the nature of condominium ownership as an ownership.
Conclusively, this study asserts more than anything else that ownership aspects of condominium ownership come to change. In other words, it is reasonable to accept that the ownership aspects of condominium ownership have changed due to changed resolution requirements on reconstruction in Condominium Ownership Act as entirely revised in 2002. First, as consistently discussed above, it is absolutely evident that condominium ownership belongs to ownership right. Second, nevertheless, it is found that condominium ownership is an ownership right whose nature inevitably involves internal constraints due to implementation or restrictions from binding force of statute, compliance with joint profits and more. Third, the nature of condominium ownership as an ownership right becomes considerably weakened, because regulations on claim for auction and claim for sale in reconstruction business justify forfeiture of ownership right.
Fourth, based on the resolution provisions on reconstruction in current all-out revision of Japan's Condominium Ownership Act, it is found that spatial limitation on exclusive possession as scheduled originally in condominium ownership evolves or degenerates even into temporal limitation and ultimately the ownership nature of condominium ownership comes to ‘change' beyond weakening.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강혁신, "집합건물에서의 ‘時價’에 관한 연구" 국제지역학회 10 (10): 2006

2 강혁신, "공동주택에서의 전유부분 사용방법과 ‘공동의 이익’에 관한 연구" 한국법학회 24 : 2006

3 박경량, "공동주택 입주자의 관리의무" 법과 사회 이론 연구회 (21) : 2001

4 丸山英, "都市の法律" 悠?社 2000

5 尹喆洪, "所有權의 歷史" 法元社 1995

6 濱崎恭生, "建物?分所有法の改正" 法曹? 1989

7 玉田弘毅, "建物?分所有法" 一粒社 1975

8 水本浩, "基本法コンメンタ?ル,マンション法" 日本評論社 1999

9 丸山英, "分所有法の理論と動態" 三省堂 1985

10 丸山英, "分所有法" 大成出版社 1984

11 ?山正明, "不動産法第5卷 ?分所有法" ?山書林 1997

12 ?本洋之助, "コンメンタ?ル マンション?分所有法" 日本評論社 1997

13 石尾賢二, "“マンションの復興と少?者の?利”, 商大論集　第48?　第1?, 神?商科大????究所, 1996"

14 ?智文, "“マンションの?有部分の使用用途を定める規約の拘束力”, 不動産?究, 日本不動産?究所, 1992"

15 丸山英, "“?分所有の所有?性”, 日本不動産??誌 第16?　第4?, 日本不動産??, 2003. 4"

16 김형배, "?민법학강의?, 신조사, 2003"

17 法務省明時局?事官室, "?新しいマンション法?,（社)商事法務?究?, 1994"

18 鎌野邦紀, "?改正?分所有法＆建替え事業法の解??, 民事法?究?, 2004"

19 玉田弘毅, "?建物?分所有法の現代的課題?,(社)商事法務?究?,1981"

20 ?崎勤, "??分所有?係訴訟法 : 裁判?務?系19?, ?林書院, 1992"