RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      리이더쉽理論에 관한 考察 = A Study on Leadership Theories

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30005225

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This is an attempt to analyze various theoretical and practices of leadership. The classic research studies on leadership set the stage for the theoretical development of leadership. The trait theories concentrate on the leader themselves but, with the possible exception of intelligence, really do not come up with any agreed traits of leader. The group theories emphasize the importance of the followers, but these are also only partial theories.
      The conclusion to be drawn from the studies of leadership style or behavior is that there is no one universal style. There is some evidence that the various styles are of two kinds: concern for people and concern for task. Additionally, because investigations of leadership style have failed to consider significant factors such as the task, the group, and the organizational effectiveness.
      Today, the widely recognized theories of leadership are situationally based. In particular, Fiedler's contingency model makes a significant contribution to leadership theory and potentially to the practice of human resource management. The path-goal approach is also an important contribution to leadership theory. It incorporates expectancy motivation concepts. Both the Fiedler and path-goal approaches have generated a growing body of research on leadership dimensions, but there are still problems. A social learning approach that incorporates the leader, the situation, and the behavior itself is proposed as a possible alternative. This approach emphasizes the importance of behavior and the continuous, interacting nature of all the variables in leadership.
      In conclusion, all of these approaches to leadership style need more and better research in order to make meaningful contributions to the actual practice of human resource management in the future.
      번역하기

      This is an attempt to analyze various theoretical and practices of leadership. The classic research studies on leadership set the stage for the theoretical development of leadership. The trait theories concentrate on the leader themselves but, with th...

      This is an attempt to analyze various theoretical and practices of leadership. The classic research studies on leadership set the stage for the theoretical development of leadership. The trait theories concentrate on the leader themselves but, with the possible exception of intelligence, really do not come up with any agreed traits of leader. The group theories emphasize the importance of the followers, but these are also only partial theories.
      The conclusion to be drawn from the studies of leadership style or behavior is that there is no one universal style. There is some evidence that the various styles are of two kinds: concern for people and concern for task. Additionally, because investigations of leadership style have failed to consider significant factors such as the task, the group, and the organizational effectiveness.
      Today, the widely recognized theories of leadership are situationally based. In particular, Fiedler's contingency model makes a significant contribution to leadership theory and potentially to the practice of human resource management. The path-goal approach is also an important contribution to leadership theory. It incorporates expectancy motivation concepts. Both the Fiedler and path-goal approaches have generated a growing body of research on leadership dimensions, but there are still problems. A social learning approach that incorporates the leader, the situation, and the behavior itself is proposed as a possible alternative. This approach emphasizes the importance of behavior and the continuous, interacting nature of all the variables in leadership.
      In conclusion, all of these approaches to leadership style need more and better research in order to make meaningful contributions to the actual practice of human resource management in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 리이더쉽의 本質
      • Ⅲ. 리이더쉽의 機能
      • Ⅳ. 리이더쉽理論의 展開過程
      • Ⅴ. 特性理論
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 리이더쉽의 本質
      • Ⅲ. 리이더쉽의 機能
      • Ⅳ. 리이더쉽理論의 展開過程
      • Ⅴ. 特性理論
      • Ⅵ. 行動理論
      • 1. 專制型·民主型·放任型리이더쉽
      • 2. 미시간大學의 硏究
      • 3. 오하이오 州立大學의 硏究
      • 4. 매니지리일 그리드理論
      • 5. PM理論
      • Ⅶ. 狀況理論
      • 1. 피이든리의 狀況適合理論
      • 2. 리이더쉽의 經路-目標理論
      • 3. 리이더쉽의 3次元모델
      • Ⅷ. 結論
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼