RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    명의주주의 법적 지위와 명의개서의 상호관계 - 대법원 2017. 3. 23. 선고 2015다248342 판결 - = Mutual Relations between Legal Status of Title Shareholder and Entry of a Change of Shareholder in Register of Shareholders

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104185089

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Supreme Court held that title shareholder(plaintiff) in the register of shareholders has a standing to sue in an action for revocation of resolution of the shareholders meeting, even though the shareholder is not a real shareholder as a payer of purchasing money.
    The court reasoned that shareholder`s right transferred by purchasing stock is vested in the real shareholder under the corporate law, but is attributed to the title shareholder according to the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy in case the listed stocks are purchased.
    On the other hand, the court held that only title shareholder should exercise his or her right against the issuing company and also the company should never permit the real shareholder to exercise the right because the entry of a change of shareholder in the register has a bilaterally legal binding force against both the company and the title holder, although the real shareholder has the right by the title trust agreement between the parties. Such decision was based on the character as organizational law of company law.
    In this paper, the court decision is commented in comparison with the existing cases and legal theories, and also some issues are analysed in relation to the review of legitimacy for the entry of a change of shareholder in the register.
    번역하기

    The Supreme Court held that title shareholder(plaintiff) in the register of shareholders has a standing to sue in an action for revocation of resolution of the shareholders meeting, even though the shareholder is not a real shareholder as a payer of p...

    The Supreme Court held that title shareholder(plaintiff) in the register of shareholders has a standing to sue in an action for revocation of resolution of the shareholders meeting, even though the shareholder is not a real shareholder as a payer of purchasing money.
    The court reasoned that shareholder`s right transferred by purchasing stock is vested in the real shareholder under the corporate law, but is attributed to the title shareholder according to the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy in case the listed stocks are purchased.
    On the other hand, the court held that only title shareholder should exercise his or her right against the issuing company and also the company should never permit the real shareholder to exercise the right because the entry of a change of shareholder in the register has a bilaterally legal binding force against both the company and the title holder, although the real shareholder has the right by the title trust agreement between the parties. Such decision was based on the character as organizational law of company law.
    In this paper, the court decision is commented in comparison with the existing cases and legal theories, and also some issues are analysed in relation to the review of legitimacy for the entry of a change of shareholder in the register.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼