RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국에서의 대조언어학의 특징과 발전 추세 = Features and Trends of Contrastive Linguistics in China Shanghai International Studies University

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100681586

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Contrastive linguistics can be defined as a sub-branch of linguistics that explores universality and discrepancy through contrastive studies of two or more languages. Recently, as an emerging discipline in linguistic studies, contrastive linguistics in China is gaining an increasing significance. Particularly, in the field of foreign language education, it is one of the most important theories and methods that gains unprecedented popularity. However, so far there is no consensus among researchers about fundamental issues such as the nature of language, research methodologies and objectives, …etc. Firstly, some scholars insist on directing at the narrow-sense applied linguistics on a traditional Contrastive Analysis basis; others turn to a broader-sense direction that features the application of comparative methods. The former has features of synchronity, descriptivity, discrepancy and applicability while the latter has interdisciplinary features, combining synchronity and diachronity, descriptivity and explanatoriness, theories and application. In recent trend, compared with the contrastive studies for foreign language education in a narrow sense, interdisciplinary research in a broader sense has become the mainstream research paradigm. Contrastive research in a broader sense has two orientations. One is called “linguistic outlook orientation”, the other “linguistic typology orientation”. The former defines contrastive linguistics as a discipline that explores linguistic outlook on a philosophical basis, i.e. a discipline that studying similarities and differences of different races’ concepts, meaning systems, value systems and ways of thinking. It claims that the ultimate goal is to facilitate the development of general linguistics so as to promote communication and understanding between different cultures and civilizations. The latter holds that linguistic typology provides a fundamental theoretical framework for contrastive linguistics (theoretical contrastive linguistics), arguing that contrastive linguistics should contribute to probing into the universality (in particular, the connotative universality) of human languages. Based on generalizing features of contrastive studies in China, this paper analyzes the current status and the existing problems in contrastive research and inquiries into its future trend.
    번역하기

    Contrastive linguistics can be defined as a sub-branch of linguistics that explores universality and discrepancy through contrastive studies of two or more languages. Recently, as an emerging discipline in linguistic studies, contrastive linguistics i...

    Contrastive linguistics can be defined as a sub-branch of linguistics that explores universality and discrepancy through contrastive studies of two or more languages. Recently, as an emerging discipline in linguistic studies, contrastive linguistics in China is gaining an increasing significance. Particularly, in the field of foreign language education, it is one of the most important theories and methods that gains unprecedented popularity. However, so far there is no consensus among researchers about fundamental issues such as the nature of language, research methodologies and objectives, …etc. Firstly, some scholars insist on directing at the narrow-sense applied linguistics on a traditional Contrastive Analysis basis; others turn to a broader-sense direction that features the application of comparative methods. The former has features of synchronity, descriptivity, discrepancy and applicability while the latter has interdisciplinary features, combining synchronity and diachronity, descriptivity and explanatoriness, theories and application. In recent trend, compared with the contrastive studies for foreign language education in a narrow sense, interdisciplinary research in a broader sense has become the mainstream research paradigm. Contrastive research in a broader sense has two orientations. One is called “linguistic outlook orientation”, the other “linguistic typology orientation”. The former defines contrastive linguistics as a discipline that explores linguistic outlook on a philosophical basis, i.e. a discipline that studying similarities and differences of different races’ concepts, meaning systems, value systems and ways of thinking. It claims that the ultimate goal is to facilitate the development of general linguistics so as to promote communication and understanding between different cultures and civilizations. The latter holds that linguistic typology provides a fundamental theoretical framework for contrastive linguistics (theoretical contrastive linguistics), arguing that contrastive linguistics should contribute to probing into the universality (in particular, the connotative universality) of human languages. Based on generalizing features of contrastive studies in China, this paper analyzes the current status and the existing problems in contrastive research and inquiries into its future trend.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼