RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    论第三人代为给付契约的司法界定

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82372848

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The third person involved in debt means that the course ought to ensure the security of its legal nature, or debt transfer, or a third party to benefit, will directly affect the ultimate accountability. Third party to lease payments and payments on behalf of a third act both for the theoretical circle, or judicial practice, the law is a new application. China"fs "gContract Law,"h the 65th article of the third party to perform the contract payment the liability method, but not on behalf of third party payment contract for clearly defined, and legal theorists have not systematically on this issue and China, Chinese law, subrogation, subrogate, payment by subrogation, performance by subrogation, third-party payment, debt transfer, guarantee, accountability relatively complete study and comb. The lack of both a direct result of the differences in the administration of justice and the rule differences. The same or similar legal fact, the formation of different courts in different and even contrary ruling, this certainly should cause us to think. We need to appropriate law enforcement standard, and relatively uniform scale. This paper together with the shareholders involved in a typical case of corporate bonds to start, analyzes the meaning of the shareholders involved in corporate bonds, said the legal nature and focus of the third party to benefit the administration of justice define the issues in-depth legal research.
    This paper attempts to theoretical analysis of typical cases, a clear third party to the judicial definition of lease payments, third party intervention unified debt Responsibility. I hope this benefits all of the third party to resolve contract related issues, serve.
    번역하기

    The third person involved in debt means that the course ought to ensure the security of its legal nature, or debt transfer, or a third party to benefit, will directly affect the ultimate accountability. Third party to lease payments and payments on be...

    The third person involved in debt means that the course ought to ensure the security of its legal nature, or debt transfer, or a third party to benefit, will directly affect the ultimate accountability. Third party to lease payments and payments on behalf of a third act both for the theoretical circle, or judicial practice, the law is a new application. China"fs "gContract Law,"h the 65th article of the third party to perform the contract payment the liability method, but not on behalf of third party payment contract for clearly defined, and legal theorists have not systematically on this issue and China, Chinese law, subrogation, subrogate, payment by subrogation, performance by subrogation, third-party payment, debt transfer, guarantee, accountability relatively complete study and comb. The lack of both a direct result of the differences in the administration of justice and the rule differences. The same or similar legal fact, the formation of different courts in different and even contrary ruling, this certainly should cause us to think. We need to appropriate law enforcement standard, and relatively uniform scale. This paper together with the shareholders involved in a typical case of corporate bonds to start, analyzes the meaning of the shareholders involved in corporate bonds, said the legal nature and focus of the third party to benefit the administration of justice define the issues in-depth legal research.
    This paper attempts to theoretical analysis of typical cases, a clear third party to the judicial definition of lease payments, third party intervention unified debt Responsibility. I hope this benefits all of the third party to resolve contract related issues, serve.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 一. 一起股东介入公司债务纠纷的典型案例
    • 二. 涉案“协议”性质之法理分析
    • (一) 保证担保性质之否定
    • (二) 债务转移性质之否定
    • (三) 第三人代为给付性质之肯定
    • 一. 一起股东介入公司债务纠纷的典型案例
    • 二. 涉案“协议”性质之法理分析
    • (一) 保证担保性质之否定
    • (二) 债务转移性质之否定
    • (三) 第三人代为给付性质之肯定
    • 三.第三人代为给付契约法理分析及司法界定
    • (一) 第三人代为给付与第三人代为给付契约的关系
    • (二) 第三人代为给付契约的特点
    • (三) 第三人代为给付契约与债务转移协议及保证担保合同的司法界定
    • 四.结束语
    • ≪ 参考文献≫
    • 중문요약
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 王利明, "违约责任论(修订版)" 中国政法大学出版社 2000

    2 于维兰, "谈谈保证担保中的几个问题" 法学论坛 1995

    3 吴文嫔, "论第三人利益合同法律关系之变动" 2008

    4 王利明, "论第三人利益合同" 法律出版社 2004

    5 庄海丽, "论第三人利益合同" 2006

    6 贾林青, "论法国保证制度之比例原则及对我国司法宪著的启示" 法律适用 2007

    7 张启江, "论利他合同制度在我国合同法中的构建" 2004

    8 杨奕, "第三人代为履行与债务转移的区别" 2009

    9 沈宗灵, "现代西方法律哲" 北京大学出版社 1996

    10 王秋良, "涉他契约及其方法论的思考" 法治论丛 2003

    1 王利明, "违约责任论(修订版)" 中国政法大学出版社 2000

    2 于维兰, "谈谈保证担保中的几个问题" 法学论坛 1995

    3 吴文嫔, "论第三人利益合同法律关系之变动" 2008

    4 王利明, "论第三人利益合同" 法律出版社 2004

    5 庄海丽, "论第三人利益合同" 2006

    6 贾林青, "论法国保证制度之比例原则及对我国司法宪著的启示" 法律适用 2007

    7 张启江, "论利他合同制度在我国合同法中的构建" 2004

    8 杨奕, "第三人代为履行与债务转移的区别" 2009

    9 沈宗灵, "现代西方法律哲" 北京大学出版社 1996

    10 王秋良, "涉他契约及其方法论的思考" 法治论丛 2003

    11 赵振营, "浅谈合同法中的第三人代为履行与债务转移"

    12 尹田, "法国现代合同法" 法律出版社 1995

    13 郑玉波, "民法债编总论" 中国政法大学出版社 2004

    14 朱岩, "利于第三人合同研究" 2005

    15 龚兵, "免责的债务承担" 2006

    16 李淑明, "债法总论" 台湾元照出版社 2006

    17 森田三男, "债权法总论" 学阳书房 1978

    18 鲁篱, "债权实现中的利益平衡" 法学家 2009

    19 薛专, "债务转让与第三人代为履行的区别" 律师世界 2002

    20 韦莹, "债务加入理论问题探析" 辽宁行政学院学 2009

    21 李学斌, "保证担保人的抗辩权" 现代法学 1997

    22 韩世远, "中国的履行障碍法" 中国政法大学出版社 (창간) : 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2017-06-01 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean-Chinese Society of Law -> The Korea-China Society of Law KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.14 0.14 0.1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.1 0.08 0.241 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼