쿠빌라이 정부의 오르톡 정책과 해상무역의 발전 = Ortoq-related Policy and Developments of Maritime Trading of Khubilai’s Government

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the early stage of establishment of the empire, the Mongolian government had provided excessive privileges to the Ortoq merchants, and also tolerated their indiscriminate profit-seeking activities while being consistent in treating them too leniently. Thus, these measures had increased the burdens on the local government and the people as well, and caused the leakage of enormous amount of property possessed by the imperial family. To get rid of such negative effects, Khubilai’s government had placed the Ortoq merchants under the control of the central government, and having established the Bureau of General Administration of Ortoq(斡脫總管府), the central government had this bureau integrate and control their profit-seeking activities accordingly. After conquering the Southern Song Dynasty, the range of Ortoq merchants’ activities had expanded to the southern province of China, and also to the parts of South China Sea. For this reason, Khubilai’s Government had raised the status of the Bureau of General Administration of Ortoq to the Office of Administration of Taxation, Foreign Commodities, and Property(泉府司, Quan-fu-si), and propelled the promotional policies of maritime trade in an aggressive manner, having regarded the Ortoq merchants as the main agent of foreign trade activities. After Ahmad’s downfall, the Quan-fu-si was abolished by Chinkim and the bureaucracy of Han Chinese Group temporarily, however, this office was re-established in one year and four months by Khubilai and the group of government officials who had come from the countries bordering on Western China, and tried to promote maritime trading. Since then, having brought the Office of Foreign Trade(市舶司) under complete control of the Quan-fu-si, Khubilai’s Government had prepared an administration and support system for the maritime trade activities for Ortoq merchants in a unitary manner, and also expanded the scale for activities and its range drastically by carrying out oversea trade with official ship(官本船貿易). In addition, to pursue the promotional policies for maritime trade in a more efficient manner, Khubilai’s Government had established a local office, called “Xing-quan-fu-si”(行泉府司) in the southeastern region of China, which is a kind of a branch of Quan-fu-si and appointed Shab-ad-din(沙不丁), who was a merchant from the country bordering on Western China, as the Minister. He had produced enormous amount of commercial profit having administered and operated the maritime activities of Ortoq merchants efficiently. Despite that Shab-ad-din had been picked as the partisan of Sangha after his downfall, he received credit for his contribution to expanding the government’s financial income, so then he was able to avoid punishment. Rather, Shab-ad-din had served as the Minister of Xing-quan-fu-si, and had been responsible for the maritime trade activities of Ortoq merchants, and carried out his duties in a consistent and stable manner. Likewise, according to the policy stance of Khubilai’s Government, which aimed at protecting and promoting maritime trade activities of Ortoq merchants, the maritime trade between the East and West during Mongol period had been flourishing and prosperous having surpassed all previous achievements. The maritime trade activities of Ortoq merchants and the protective and management policy by Khubilai’s government had provided the principal factor of establishment of Pax-Mongolica in the 13th to 14th Century. In that regard, such events will carry significant historical meaning.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고명수, "쿠빌라이 정부의 南海정책과 해외무역의 번영 -몽골의 전통적 세계관과 관련하여-" 역사연구소 (72) : 235-265, 2011

2 고명수, "쿠빌라이 시기 몽골의 南宋정복과 江南지배 ― 보전, 개발, 발전의 관점에서 ―" 동양사학회 (116) : 213-245, 2011

3 라시드 앗 딘, "칸의 후예들" 사계절 2005

4 "金華黃先生文集" 北京圖書館出版社 2005

5 高橋弘臣, "舊南宋領における元朝の貨幣政策" 4 : 1998

6 黃時鑒, "眞金與元初政治" 3 : 1986

7 "珊瑚木難 (朱存理, 四庫全書本)"

8 "牧庵集 (姚燧, 四庫全書本)"

9 楊育鎂, "沙不丁與元代南海貿易發展的關係" 18 : 2007

10 愛宕松男, "斡脱銭とその背景-十三世紀モンゴル=元朝における銀の動向- (上)·(下)" 32 (32): 1973

11 翁獨健, "斡脫雜考" 29 : 1941

12 陳高華, "宋元時代海外貿易" 天津人民出版社 1981

13 "吳文正公集 (吳澄, 四庫全書本)"

14 村上正二, "元朝における泉府司と斡脫" 13 (13): 1942

15 蘇天爵, "元文類 (四庫全書本)"

16 "元史" 中華書局 1976

17 "元典章" 國立故宮博物院 1972

18 高榮盛, "元代海外貿易硏究" 四川人民出版社 1998

19 馬建春, "元代東遷西域人及其文化硏究" 民族出版社 2003

20 修曉波, "元代斡脫經營海外貿易的原因及影響" 7 : 1999

21 修曉波, "元代斡脫政策探考" (3) : 1994

22 廖大珂, "元代官營航海貿易制度述論" (2) : 1998

23 喩常森, "元代官本船海外貿易制度" (2) : 1991

24 村上正二, "元代の斡脱銭に就いて" 7 (7): 1937

25 鄭有國, "中國市舶制度硏究" 福建敎育出版社 2004

26 高榮盛, "シハーブッディーンと元代の行泉府司, In 内陸圏·海域圏交流ネットワークとイスラム" 櫂歌書房 2006

27 片山共夫, "アーマッドの暗殺事件をめぐって-元朝フビライ期の政治史" 11 : 1983

28 Black, Robert P., "The Circulation of Silver in the Moslem East Down to the Mongol Epoch" 2 (2): 1937

29 Allsen, Thomas T., "Mongolian Princes and Their Merchant Partners, 1200~1260" 2 (2): 1260

30 Endicott-West, Elizabeth, "Merchant Associations in Yüan China: The Ortoɤ" 2 (2): 1989