RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현대미학과 디자인 비평을 통한 디자인 인식에 관한 연구 = 하우크 , 장 보들리아의 이론과 베네통의 사례를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101724513

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Modern design has been limited to a tool for centralization of social economic system since its conceptual root is on the utilitarian service through "Art Democratization" caused democratic economic system in 21th century. All interest of design has been to maintain and develope methods and techniques for utilitarian art. The trait of design theories is to study propriety and methodology of the strict technique within fixed and ruled value. Instrumental theories don`t comment what factors are important but consider importance of external appearance in design like a panacea. As for problems commented above in modern design, I am going to study and analyze why modern design theories are developed like that and why the people misunderstand design concepts. At first, I will give the comprehensive understanding of aesthetics and define design concepts on it. I will comment the frame of product aesthetics in other to criticize modern design at aesthetic point of mass media and modern society. Based on Baudrillard`s and Haug`s theories, I will explain about design concepts which has been proceeded to incorrect direction and advertising design of Benetton as a example. Through modern aesthetics and design criticism, we have a good opportunity to recover important things we lost and to understand aesthetics and correct design concepts.
      번역하기

      Modern design has been limited to a tool for centralization of social economic system since its conceptual root is on the utilitarian service through "Art Democratization" caused democratic economic system in 21th century. All interest of design has b...

      Modern design has been limited to a tool for centralization of social economic system since its conceptual root is on the utilitarian service through "Art Democratization" caused democratic economic system in 21th century. All interest of design has been to maintain and develope methods and techniques for utilitarian art. The trait of design theories is to study propriety and methodology of the strict technique within fixed and ruled value. Instrumental theories don`t comment what factors are important but consider importance of external appearance in design like a panacea. As for problems commented above in modern design, I am going to study and analyze why modern design theories are developed like that and why the people misunderstand design concepts. At first, I will give the comprehensive understanding of aesthetics and define design concepts on it. I will comment the frame of product aesthetics in other to criticize modern design at aesthetic point of mass media and modern society. Based on Baudrillard`s and Haug`s theories, I will explain about design concepts which has been proceeded to incorrect direction and advertising design of Benetton as a example. Through modern aesthetics and design criticism, we have a good opportunity to recover important things we lost and to understand aesthetics and correct design concepts.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼