RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    虛僞ㆍ誇張廣告의 詐欺罪 成否 - 不動産廣告를 중심으로  :  虛僞ㆍ誇張廣告의 詐欺罪 成否 = Real Estate Advertisement and Realization or Failure of Fraud -Focusing on Real Estate Advertisement-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76453571

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The fraud in the context of property law does not appear simply as a deception of others but as a form of an act that exploits a person"s defrauded state, to dispose the property. The Korean substantive criminal statute merely provides ""by frauding people"". The provision should include not only factual aspects but also prescriptive aspects. Although a transaction involves the widespread practice of exaggeration or fabrication, the transaction should be considered as a fraud when an actor"s main purpose is to deceive another to enter a transaction of property.
    Even though both fabricative and exaggerative advertisements clearly constitute frauds, these forms of frauds should be justified as an reasonably justifiable act based on the article 20th of the Korean substantive criminal statute.
    The mere display of fabricative or exaggerative advertisements is not a meaningful commencement of frauds. Rather, an act of fraud should be considered to start when a purchaser is personally told about fabricative or exaggerative advertisements or called from a seller. That is, it should be considered as a commencement of a criminal fraud when an actor exploits a defrauded and confused purchaser.
    번역하기

    The fraud in the context of property law does not appear simply as a deception of others but as a form of an act that exploits a person"s defrauded state, to dispose the property. The Korean substantive criminal statute merely provides ""by frauding...

    The fraud in the context of property law does not appear simply as a deception of others but as a form of an act that exploits a person"s defrauded state, to dispose the property. The Korean substantive criminal statute merely provides ""by frauding people"". The provision should include not only factual aspects but also prescriptive aspects. Although a transaction involves the widespread practice of exaggeration or fabrication, the transaction should be considered as a fraud when an actor"s main purpose is to deceive another to enter a transaction of property.
    Even though both fabricative and exaggerative advertisements clearly constitute frauds, these forms of frauds should be justified as an reasonably justifiable act based on the article 20th of the Korean substantive criminal statute.
    The mere display of fabricative or exaggerative advertisements is not a meaningful commencement of frauds. Rather, an act of fraud should be considered to start when a purchaser is personally told about fabricative or exaggerative advertisements or called from a seller. That is, it should be considered as a commencement of a criminal fraud when an actor exploits a defrauded and confused purchaser.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 허위광고ㆍ과장광고의 구별
    • Ⅲ. 허위ㆍ과장광고가 기망이 되는 기준
    • Ⅳ. 기망시점
    • Ⅴ. 맺는말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 허위광고ㆍ과장광고의 구별
    • Ⅲ. 허위ㆍ과장광고가 기망이 되는 기준
    • Ⅳ. 기망시점
    • Ⅴ. 맺는말
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼