RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    온라인신문에서의 시민저널리즘 가능성 연구 = 일상적 실천을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210114

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Overall performances of the present sample of public journalism online newspapers are not good enough to support the argument that public journalism could be better practiced in online than in offline environments and also better practiced in public journalism newspapers than in non-public journalism papers. The goal of this study is to examine the contents of the online newspaper that might reflect the possibilities of this new medium for public journalism practice. This study examined how far and deep public journalism practices have extended into online journalism as journalism's new tradition. This study also analyzed the news coverage of the corresponding print editions to uncover any differences between online and print versions. The two composite measures based upon the nine elements in four categories of public journalism practice and the eight variables in three categories of interactivity were used as indicators of public journalism practice. The analysis of this study reveals a mixed result for public journalism practice in online environments. Both aggregate and individual level of analysis for the public journalism index reveal that there is not much difference between public journalism and non-public journalism online papers in their practice of public journalism principles. Also, there is not much difference between online and offline newspapers. Overall performances of the present sample of public journalism online newspapers are not good enough to support the argument that public journalism is better practiced in online environments than in traditional print.
    번역하기

    Overall performances of the present sample of public journalism online newspapers are not good enough to support the argument that public journalism could be better practiced in online than in offline environments and also better practiced in public j...

    Overall performances of the present sample of public journalism online newspapers are not good enough to support the argument that public journalism could be better practiced in online than in offline environments and also better practiced in public journalism newspapers than in non-public journalism papers. The goal of this study is to examine the contents of the online newspaper that might reflect the possibilities of this new medium for public journalism practice. This study examined how far and deep public journalism practices have extended into online journalism as journalism's new tradition. This study also analyzed the news coverage of the corresponding print editions to uncover any differences between online and print versions. The two composite measures based upon the nine elements in four categories of public journalism practice and the eight variables in three categories of interactivity were used as indicators of public journalism practice. The analysis of this study reveals a mixed result for public journalism practice in online environments. Both aggregate and individual level of analysis for the public journalism index reveal that there is not much difference between public journalism and non-public journalism online papers in their practice of public journalism principles. Also, there is not much difference between online and offline newspapers. Overall performances of the present sample of public journalism online newspapers are not good enough to support the argument that public journalism is better practiced in online environments than in traditional print.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기
    해외이동버튼