RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유언대용신탁 및 수익자연속신탁의 과세에 대한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99768050

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The recent amendments of "Trust Act" introduce the concepts of "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries". In order that the two trusts just mentioned work well, the tax treatments of them are to be well established. This paper explores the tax treatments of them, the results of which are as follows.
    First, "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" are to be treated as pass-through entities without any special circumstances.
    Second, even if "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" are treated as pass-through entities, they may well be subject to taxes, unless they are manipulated by grantors or their properties belong to grantors. And the beneficiaries should be taxed at the time of receiving trust"s principals and incomes therefrom.
    Third, the tax rates applicable to the trusts are those the grantors are subject to if they still possess the trust"s principals and incomes.
    Fourth, the taxes levied on the trusts in gift or inheritance transactions should be integrated through credit against gift or inheritance taxes levied on beneficiaries.
    Fifth, "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" themselves may well not be subject to gift or inheritance taxes.
    Sixth, it is inappropriate to determine whether grantor trust rules are applied only due to the standard of whether beneficiaries are specified.
    Seventh, the trust"s principals and incomes should be valued as of the transfer date from the trusts to their beneficiaries. But trust interests with certain time limits or conditions should be valued through discounting the cash flows from trust interests.
    Eighth, if trust interests are divided into principal interests and income interests, the interests should be valued in the same manner as trust interests with certain time limits or conditions.
    Ninth, in case that "trust with successive beneficiaries" is set up and its interests are divided into principal interests and income interests, the interests should be valued as of transfer date to next beneficiary in the same manner as trust interests with certain time limits or conditions. But if the next beneficiary belongs to the next generation, the interest should be valued as if trust"s principal is transferred in total.
    Tenth, even if "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" belong to "trust with no beneficiary" for the time being, there is no need to establish the special rules. It is enough to treat the trusts in the same manner as the other types of "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries".
    번역하기

    The recent amendments of "Trust Act" introduce the concepts of "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries". In order that the two trusts just mentioned work well, the tax treatments of them are to be well established. This...

    The recent amendments of "Trust Act" introduce the concepts of "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries". In order that the two trusts just mentioned work well, the tax treatments of them are to be well established. This paper explores the tax treatments of them, the results of which are as follows.
    First, "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" are to be treated as pass-through entities without any special circumstances.
    Second, even if "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" are treated as pass-through entities, they may well be subject to taxes, unless they are manipulated by grantors or their properties belong to grantors. And the beneficiaries should be taxed at the time of receiving trust"s principals and incomes therefrom.
    Third, the tax rates applicable to the trusts are those the grantors are subject to if they still possess the trust"s principals and incomes.
    Fourth, the taxes levied on the trusts in gift or inheritance transactions should be integrated through credit against gift or inheritance taxes levied on beneficiaries.
    Fifth, "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" themselves may well not be subject to gift or inheritance taxes.
    Sixth, it is inappropriate to determine whether grantor trust rules are applied only due to the standard of whether beneficiaries are specified.
    Seventh, the trust"s principals and incomes should be valued as of the transfer date from the trusts to their beneficiaries. But trust interests with certain time limits or conditions should be valued through discounting the cash flows from trust interests.
    Eighth, if trust interests are divided into principal interests and income interests, the interests should be valued in the same manner as trust interests with certain time limits or conditions.
    Ninth, in case that "trust with successive beneficiaries" is set up and its interests are divided into principal interests and income interests, the interests should be valued as of transfer date to next beneficiary in the same manner as trust interests with certain time limits or conditions. But if the next beneficiary belongs to the next generation, the interest should be valued as if trust"s principal is transferred in total.
    Tenth, even if "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries" belong to "trust with no beneficiary" for the time being, there is no need to establish the special rules. It is enough to treat the trusts in the same manner as the other types of "trust as substitute for will" and "trust with successive beneficiaries".

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 【초록】
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 우리의 신탁과세 및 상속세법 및 증여세법상 신탁의 취급
    • Ⅲ. 외국의 입법례
    • Ⅳ. 유언대용신탁 및 수익자연속신탁에 관한 과세방안
    • 【초록】
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 우리의 신탁과세 및 상속세법 및 증여세법상 신탁의 취급
    • Ⅲ. 외국의 입법례
    • Ⅳ. 유언대용신탁 및 수익자연속신탁에 관한 과세방안
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 久禮義継, "流動化⋅証券化の会計と税務" 中央経済社 2008

    2 이준봉, "일본 신탁과세제도와 그 시사점" 법학연구소 21 (21): 971-992, 2009

    3 이준봉, "유동화거래와 조세" 한국학술정보(주) 2012

    4 이준봉, "세법 상 법적 실체인 신탁의 도입에 관한 검토" 법학연구소 23 (23): 415-453, 2011

    5 稅理士法人 UAP, "詳解 信託の稅務" 中央経済社 2009

    6 藤本幸彦, "投資ストラクチャーの税務" 税務経理協会 2007

    7 笹島, "信託を活用した新しい相続⋅贈与のすすめ" (財)大臟財務協会 2011

    8 藤本幸彦, "信託の税務ー信託と集団投資ストラクチャー" 税務経理協会 2007

    9 William H. Hoffman, Jr., "South-Western Federal Taxation: Corporations, Partnership, Estates & Trusts" SOUTH- WESTERN 2012

    10 Byrle M. Abbin, "Income Taxation of Fiduciaries and Beneficiaries, Vol. 2" CCH 2008

    1 久禮義継, "流動化⋅証券化の会計と税務" 中央経済社 2008

    2 이준봉, "일본 신탁과세제도와 그 시사점" 법학연구소 21 (21): 971-992, 2009

    3 이준봉, "유동화거래와 조세" 한국학술정보(주) 2012

    4 이준봉, "세법 상 법적 실체인 신탁의 도입에 관한 검토" 법학연구소 23 (23): 415-453, 2011

    5 稅理士法人 UAP, "詳解 信託の稅務" 中央経済社 2009

    6 藤本幸彦, "投資ストラクチャーの税務" 税務経理協会 2007

    7 笹島, "信託を活用した新しい相続⋅贈与のすすめ" (財)大臟財務協会 2011

    8 藤本幸彦, "信託の税務ー信託と集団投資ストラクチャー" 税務経理協会 2007

    9 William H. Hoffman, Jr., "South-Western Federal Taxation: Corporations, Partnership, Estates & Trusts" SOUTH- WESTERN 2012

    10 Byrle M. Abbin, "Income Taxation of Fiduciaries and Beneficiaries, Vol. 2" CCH 2008

    11 Byrle M. Abbin, "Income Taxation of Fiduciaries and Beneficiaries, Vol. 1" CCH 2008

    12 James M. Peaslee, "Federal Income Taxation of Securitization Transactions" Frank J. Fabbozzi Associates 2001

    13 Marvin A. Chirlstein, "Federal Income Taxation" Foundation Press 2012

    14 Marvin A. Chirlstein, "Federal Income Taxation" Foundation Press 2005

    15 John K. Mcnulty, "Federal Estate and Gift Taxation" West 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Securities Law Association -> Korea Securities Law Association KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.08 1.08 1.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.22 1.15 1.36 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼