[Purpose]This study investigates the joint effect of auditor size and legal environments on audit opinion, a proxy for audit quality, in a cross-country setting. [Methodology]By using an international sample with 284,374 firm-year observations fr...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106230713
2019
English
329
KCI등재
학술저널
1-24(24쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
[Purpose]This study investigates the joint effect of auditor size and legal environments on audit opinion, a proxy for audit quality, in a cross-country setting. [Methodology]By using an international sample with 284,374 firm-year observations fr...
[Purpose]This study investigates the joint effect of auditor size and legal environments on audit opinion, a proxy for audit quality, in a cross-country setting.
[Methodology]By using an international sample with 284,374 firm-year observations from 28 countries for the period of 1990-2017, we conduct multiple regression analyses of audit opinion on auditor size and the indexes of legal environments.
[Findings]We find that both Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors are more likely to issue non-clean opinions as the investor protection law becomes more strict. We also find that Big 4 auditors provide relatively more conservative audit than non-Big 4 auditors in the treatment of their respective clienteles when moving from weak to strong investor protection countries. Our evidence suggests that Big 4 auditors, in particular, provide higher quality audit in stronger legal environments where threats of litigation are higher. Moreover, result also suggests that strong legal environments need to be established as a necessary or complementary condition for the enhancement of audit quality.
[Policy Implications]We add new evidence on the joint effect of auditor size and legal environments on audit quality by suggesting that auditor size and legal environments are complementary, rather than substitutive, for the issuance of non-clean audit opinion (i.e. high quality audit). Our findings may provide an important policy implication that accounting regulators need to strengthen investor protection law as the complementary environments, not as a substitutive mechanism, for high quality audit.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 RAFAEL LA PORTA, "What Works in Securities Laws?" Wiley 61 (61): 1-32, 2006
2 D. Paul Newman, "The Role of Auditing in Investor Protection" American Accounting Association 80 (80): 289-313, 2005
3 Dan A. Simunic, "The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence" JSTOR 18 (18): 161-190, 1980
4 Jere R. Francis, "The Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Big 4 Audits on Earnings Quality around the World" Wiley 25 (25): 157-191, 2008
5 Simunic, D. A., "The Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing :A Review of The Economics and the Evidence" 15 (15): 119-134, 1996
6 DeFond, M. L., "The Geography of Auditor Independence and SEC Enforcement"
7 CONNIE L. BECKER, "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management" Wiley 15 (15): 1-24, 1998
8 Watts, R. L., "Positive Accounting Theory. Contemporary Topics in Accounting Series" Prentice-Hall 1986
9 Teoh, S. H., "Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient" 68 (68): 346-366, 1993
10 Ramgopal Venkataraman, "Litigation Risk, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings" American Accounting Association 83 (83): 1315-1345, 2008
1 RAFAEL LA PORTA, "What Works in Securities Laws?" Wiley 61 (61): 1-32, 2006
2 D. Paul Newman, "The Role of Auditing in Investor Protection" American Accounting Association 80 (80): 289-313, 2005
3 Dan A. Simunic, "The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence" JSTOR 18 (18): 161-190, 1980
4 Jere R. Francis, "The Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Big 4 Audits on Earnings Quality around the World" Wiley 25 (25): 157-191, 2008
5 Simunic, D. A., "The Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing :A Review of The Economics and the Evidence" 15 (15): 119-134, 1996
6 DeFond, M. L., "The Geography of Auditor Independence and SEC Enforcement"
7 CONNIE L. BECKER, "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management" Wiley 15 (15): 1-24, 1998
8 Watts, R. L., "Positive Accounting Theory. Contemporary Topics in Accounting Series" Prentice-Hall 1986
9 Teoh, S. H., "Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient" 68 (68): 346-366, 1993
10 Ramgopal Venkataraman, "Litigation Risk, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings" American Accounting Association 83 (83): 1315-1345, 2008
11 Inder K. Khurana, "Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus Non‐Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American Countries" American Accounting Association 79 (79): 473-495, 2004
12 Ole-Kristian Hope, "Impact of Excess Auditor Remuneration on the Cost of Equity Capital around the World" SAGE Publications 24 (24): 177-210, 2009
13 Edward I. Altman, "FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY" Wiley 23 (23): 589-609, 1968
14 Petersen, M. A., "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets:Comparing Approaches" 22 (22): 435-480, 2009
15 Christian Leuz, "Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison" Elsevier BV 69 (69): 505-527, 2003
16 J.Kenneth Reynolds, "Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions" Elsevier BV 30 (30): 375-400, 2000
17 JOSEPH P. H. FAN, "Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia" Wiley 43 (43): 35-72, 2005
18 Michel L. Magnan, "Discussion of "Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross-country Evidence"" Wiley 25 (25): 101-108, 2008
19 Jere R. Francis, "Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality" American Accounting Association 84 (84): 1521-1552, 2009
20 Jong-Hag Choi, "Auditors' Governance Functions and Legal Environments: An International Investigation" Wiley 24 (24): 13-46, 2007
21 Linda Elizabeth DeAngelo, "Auditor size and audit quality" Elsevier BV 3 (3): 183-199, 1981
22 Ole‐Kristian Hope, "Auditor Independence in a Private Firm and Low Litigation Risk Setting" American Accounting Association 85 (85): 573-605, 2010
23 Clive Lennox, "Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliations with CPA firms" Elsevier BV 39 (39): 201-231, 2005
24 Jong-Hag Choi, "Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross-country Evidence" Wiley 25 (25): 55-99, 2008
25 Palmrose, Z. V., "An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality" 63 (63): 55-73, 1988
26 Mark DeFond, "A review of archival auditing research" Elsevier BV 58 (58): 275-326, 2014
감리지적 기업의 장․단기적 주가 급락 위험:감사인의 노력을 중심으로
기타공공기관의 자체회계규정 사용이 부채비율과 이익조정에 미치는 영향
Do CEO and CFO Equity Incentives Influence Investment Inefficiency?
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2019-11-12 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한회계학회 -> 한국회계정책학회영문명 : KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF ACCOUNTING -> Korean Association for Accounting and Policy | ![]() |
2018-11-30 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 회계연구 -> 회계와 정책연구외국어명 : Korean Academic Society of Accounting -> Review of Accounting and Policy Studies | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2016-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.21 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.19 | 1.13 | 2.034 | 0.21 |