팀 응집성은 양날의 검처럼 정적?부적 효과가 있다는 논쟁에도 불구하고, 실증 연구들은 팀 응집성의 긍정적 측면을 부각하였다. 본 연구는 팀 응집성을 관계를 강조하는 사회적 응집성과 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103307742
2014
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
717-724(8쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
팀 응집성은 양날의 검처럼 정적?부적 효과가 있다는 논쟁에도 불구하고, 실증 연구들은 팀 응집성의 긍정적 측면을 부각하였다. 본 연구는 팀 응집성을 관계를 강조하는 사회적 응집성과 ...
팀 응집성은 양날의 검처럼 정적?부적 효과가 있다는 논쟁에도 불구하고, 실증 연구들은 팀 응집성의 긍정적 측면을 부각하였다. 본 연구는 팀 응집성을 관계를 강조하는 사회적 응집성과 과업을 강조하는 과업 응집성으로 구분 하고, 창의적 긴장에 의해 창출되는 기술혁신 성과를 결과변수로 본다면, 팀 응집성의 정적?부적 효과에 대한 논쟁을 실증적으로 규명할 수 있다고 보았다. 또한 응집성은 동질성을 강조하므로, 다양한 사고를 촉진시키는 팀 창의성 지 원 풍토는 사회적 응집성의 부적 효과를 완화시키고, 과업 응집성의 정적 효과를 강화시킬 것으로 보았다. 205개의 신제품개발팀들을 대상으로 설문조사한 결과, 기술혁신 성과에 대해 사회적 응집성의 부적 영향(β=-.19, p<.01), 과업 응집성의 정적 영향(β=.18, p<.05), 사회적 응집성과 팀 창의성 지원 풍토의 정적 상호작용효과(β=.14, p<.10) 및 과 업 응집성과 팀 창의성 지원 풍토의 정적 상호작용효과(β=.16, p<.05)가 있는 것으로 나타났다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Although team cohesion can be a double-edged sword, empirical studies have focused positive effect of team cohesion. This study claims that team cohesion can be divided social?task cohesion, so we can investigate positive effect of social cohesion and...
Although team cohesion can be a double-edged sword, empirical studies have focused positive effect of team cohesion. This study claims that team cohesion can be divided social?task cohesion, so we can investigate positive effect of social cohesion and negative effect of task cohesion on technological innovation. Cohesion emphasize homogeneity, thus creativity supporting team climate alleviate negative effect of social cohesion and increase positive effect of task cohesion. This study has used materials collected from 205 NPD teams The results show negative effect of social cohesion(β=-.19, p<.01), positive effect of task cohesion(β =.18, p<.05), positive interactive effect between social cohesion and creativity supporting team climate(β=.14, p<.10) and positive interactive effect between task cohesion and creativity supporting team climate(β=.16, p<.05) on technological innovation.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김영조, "기술협력 활동이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향:지식흡수능력(Absorptive Capacity)의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1365-1390, 2005
2 D. A. Leonard-Barton, "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups" Harvard Business Press 1999
3 I. Janis, "Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decisions and Fiascoes" Houghton Mifflin 1972
4 Lisa Rosh, "Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion" Elsevier BV 22 (22): 116-127, 2012
5 Brian Mullen, "The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration." American Psychological Association (APA) 115 (115): 210-227, 1994
6 Reuben M. Baron, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations." American Psychological Association (APA) 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986
7 Mark S. Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties" University of Chicago Press 78 (78): 1360-1380, 1973
8 G. H. Lee, "The Research Methods for Social Science" Bobmunsa Publishing Co 2001
9 W. N. Widmeyer, "The Measurement of Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire" Sports Dynamics 1985
10 Christine Moorman, "The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity" JSTOR 34 (34): 91-, 1997
1 김영조, "기술협력 활동이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향:지식흡수능력(Absorptive Capacity)의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1365-1390, 2005
2 D. A. Leonard-Barton, "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups" Harvard Business Press 1999
3 I. Janis, "Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decisions and Fiascoes" Houghton Mifflin 1972
4 Lisa Rosh, "Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion" Elsevier BV 22 (22): 116-127, 2012
5 Brian Mullen, "The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration." American Psychological Association (APA) 115 (115): 210-227, 1994
6 Reuben M. Baron, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations." American Psychological Association (APA) 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986
7 Mark S. Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties" University of Chicago Press 78 (78): 1360-1380, 1973
8 G. H. Lee, "The Research Methods for Social Science" Bobmunsa Publishing Co 2001
9 W. N. Widmeyer, "The Measurement of Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire" Sports Dynamics 1985
10 Christine Moorman, "The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity" JSTOR 34 (34): 91-, 1997
11 P. Senge, "The Fifth Discipline" Doubleday 1990
12 A. V. Carron, "The Development of an Instrument to Measure Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire" 7 : 244-266, 1985
13 E. Du Chatenier, "The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams" SAGE Publications 8 (8): 350-381, 2009
14 Milly Casey-Campbell, "Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature" Wiley-Blackwell 11 (11): 223-246, 2009
15 L. Festinger, "Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing" Stanford University Press 1950
16 A. Abbey, "R&D WORK CLIMATE AND INNOVATION IN SEMICONDUCTORS." The Academy of Management 26 (26): 362-368, 1983
17 Amy Edmondson, "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams" JSTOR 44 (44): 350-, 1999
18 H. Aldrich, "Organizations Evolving" Sage 1999
19 Stephen J. Zaccaro, "Nonequivalent Associations Between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality" Informa UK Limited 131 (131): 387-399, 1991
20 Philip M. Podsakoff, "Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity." American Psychological Association (APA) 82 (82): 974-983, 1997
21 S. Y. Shin, "Moderating Effects of Group Cohesiveness in Competency-performance Relationships: A Multi-level Study" 1-15, 2009
22 M. A. West, "International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working" Wiley 2003
23 Ashok K. Gupta, "Improving R&D/Marketing relations: R&D's perspective" Wiley-Blackwell 20 (20): 277-290, 1990
24 J. R. Hackman, "Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" Rand Mcnally 1455-1525, 1976
25 I, Janis, "Groupthink" Houghton Mifflin 1982
26 M. E. Shaw, "Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior" McGraw-Hill 1981
27 D. R. Forsythe, "Group Dynamics" Brooks/Cole 1999
28 Terri R. Kurtzberg, "From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity" Informa UK Limited 13 (13): 285-294, 2001
29 S. Landau, "From Conflict to Creativity" Jossey-Bass 2001
30 Christina E. Shalley, "Effects of Social-Psychological Factors on Creative Performance: The Role of Informational and Controlling Expected Evaluation and Modeling Experience" Elsevier BV 84 (84): 1-22, 2001
31 C. E. SHALLEY, "EFFECTS OF COACTION, EXPECTED EVALUATION, AND GOAL SETTING ON CREATIVITY AND PRODUCTIVITY." The Academy of Management 38 (38): 483-503, 1995
32 P. E. Mudrack, "Defining Group Cohesiveness: A Legacy of Confusion?" SAGE Publications 20 (20): 37-49, 1989
33 Aharon Tziner, "DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF GROUP COHESIVENESS TYPES: A CLARIFYING OVERVIEW" Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd 10 (10): 227-239, 1982
34 S. G. Scott, "DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE." The Academy of Management 37 (37): 580-607, 1994
35 Rajesh Sethi, "Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products" American Marketing Association (AMA) 38 (38): 73-85, 2001
36 Robert M. Moore, "Creativity of Small Groups and of Persons Working Alone" Informa UK Limited 140 (140): 142-143, 2000
37 Bernard A. Nijstad, "Creativity and Group Innovation" Wiley-Blackwell 51 (51): 400-406, 2002
38 Dennis R. Brophy, "Comparing the Attributes, Activities, and Performance of Divergent, Convergent, and Combination Thinkers" Informa UK Limited 13 (13): 439-455, 2001
39 J. A. Schumpeter, "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" Harvard University Press 1942
40 S. Schachter, "An Experimental Study of Cohesiveness and Productivity" SAGE Publications 4 (4): 229-238, 1951
41 D. G. Ancona, "Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 4" JAI Press 199-221, 1987
요양시설 입소노인의 이용만족도와 일상생활 스트레스가 우울 및 자아존중감에 미치는 영향
시뮬레이션과 계층분석법을 이용한 군 자동화 물류센터 최적 설계에 관한 연구
항공사 객실승무원의 감성지능이 서비스품질과 조직에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) | ![]() |
2017-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2007-08-28 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 한국산학기술학회논문지외국어명 : Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society | ![]() |
2007-07-06 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Korean Academic Inderstrial Society -> The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.66 | 0.61 | 0.842 | 0.23 |