국립중앙도서관 "우편 복사 서비스"로 연결 됩니다.
KCIBackground: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergenc...
다국어 입력
あ
ぁ
か
が
さ
ざ
た
だ
な
は
ば
ぱ
ま
や
ゃ
ら
わ
ゎ
ん
い
ぃ
き
ぎ
し
じ
ち
ぢ
に
ひ
び
ぴ
み
り
う
ぅ
く
ぐ
す
ず
つ
づ
っ
ぬ
ふ
ぶ
ぷ
む
ゆ
ゅ
る
え
ぇ
け
げ
せ
ぜ
て
で
ね
へ
べ
ぺ
め
れ
お
ぉ
こ
ご
そ
ぞ
と
ど
の
ほ
ぼ
ぽ
も
よ
ょ
ろ
を
ア
ァ
カ
サ
ザ
タ
ダ
ナ
ハ
バ
パ
マ
ヤ
ャ
ラ
ワ
ヮ
ン
イ
ィ
キ
ギ
シ
ジ
チ
ヂ
ニ
ヒ
ビ
ピ
ミ
リ
ウ
ゥ
ク
グ
ス
ズ
ツ
ヅ
ッ
ヌ
フ
ブ
プ
ム
ユ
ュ
ル
エ
ェ
ケ
ゲ
セ
ゼ
テ
デ
ヘ
ベ
ペ
メ
レ
オ
ォ
コ
ゴ
ソ
ゾ
ト
ド
ノ
ホ
ボ
ポ
モ
ヨ
ョ
ロ
ヲ
―
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
예시)
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
А
Б
В
Г
Д
Е
Ё
Ж
З
И
Й
К
Л
М
Н
О
П
Р
С
Т
У
Ф
Х
Ц
Ч
Ш
Щ
Ъ
Ы
Ь
Э
Ю
Я
а
б
в
г
д
е
ё
ж
з
и
й
к
л
м
н
о
п
р
с
т
у
ф
х
ц
ч
ш
щ
ъ
ы
ь
э
ю
я
′
″
℃
Å
￠
￡
￥
¤
℉
‰
＄
％
Ｆ
￦
㎕
㎖
㎗
ℓ
㎘
㏄
㎣
㎤
㎥
㎦
㎙
㎚
㎛
㎜
㎝
㎞
㎟
㎠
㎡
㎢
㏊
㎍
㎎
㎏
㏏
㎈
㎉
㏈
㎧
㎨
㎰
㎱
㎲
㎳
㎴
㎵
㎶
㎷
㎸
㎹
㎀
㎁
㎂
㎃
㎄
㎺
㎻
㎽
㎾
㎿
㎐
㎑
㎒
㎓
㎔
Ω
㏀
㏁
㎊
㎋
㎌
㏖
㏅
㎭
㎮
㎯
㏛
㎩
㎪
㎫
㎬
㏝
㏐
㏓
㏃
㏉
㏜
㏆
RISS 인기검색어
A comparative study of emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture
한글로보기https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104352083
- 저자
- 발행기관
- 학술지명
- 권호사항
-
발행연도
2012
-
작성언어
English
- 주제어
-
등재정보
KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
자료형태
학술저널
- 발행기관 URL
-
수록면
48-53(6쪽)
-
KCI 피인용횟수
0
- 제공처
-
0
상세조회 -
0
다운로드
부가정보
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Background: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Background: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Background: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Background: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergenc...
Background: Emergence agitation is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, there have been few reports in the medical literature on the occurrence of emergence agitation in adults. The aim of this study was to compare emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
Methods: Forty adults (ASA I-II, 20-60 yr) undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were randomly assigned to either sevoflurane or propofol group and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane or propofol. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored and maintained within 40-60. At the end of surgery, patients were transported to the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) and agitation state scale was checked by Aono's four-point scale (AFPS).
Emergence agitation was defined as and AFPS score of 3 or 4. Pain score were measured by numeric rating scale (NRS)on arrival and peak value at PACU.
Results: Nine (45.0%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 (10.0%) patients in the propofol group developed emergence agitation in the PACU (P = 0.031). There was no correlation between peak NRS and Aono's four-point scale.
Conclusions: Propofol may decrease incidence of emergence agitation compared to sevoflurane in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김종후, "소아에서 Propofol-Remifentanil과 Sevoflurane-Nitrous Oxide를 사용한 전신 마취 시 회복기의 비교 연구" 대한마취통증의학회 51 (51): 709-714, 2006
2 Lindenmayer JP, "The pathophysiology of agitation" 61 (61): 5-10, 2000
3 Cohen IT, "The incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anesthesia in children is reduced by fentanyl" 93 : 88-91, 2001
4 Lynch EP, "The impact of postoperative pain on the development of postoperative delirium" 86 : 781-785, 1998
5 Weldon BC, "The effect of caudal analgesia on emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia" 98 : 321-326, 2004
6 Beskow A, "Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than does halothane" 43 : 536-541, 1999
7 Radtke FM, "Risk factors for inadequate emergence after anesthesia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence" 76 : 394-403, 2010
8 Cohen IT, "Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol" 13 : 63-67, 2003
9 Nakayama S, "Propofol reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in preschool-aged children as well as in school-aged children: a comparison with sevoflurane" 21 : 19-23, 2007
10 Moore JK, "Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics" 90 : 461-466, 2003
1 김종후, "소아에서 Propofol-Remifentanil과 Sevoflurane-Nitrous Oxide를 사용한 전신 마취 시 회복기의 비교 연구" 대한마취통증의학회 51 (51): 709-714, 2006
2 Lindenmayer JP, "The pathophysiology of agitation" 61 (61): 5-10, 2000
3 Cohen IT, "The incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anesthesia in children is reduced by fentanyl" 93 : 88-91, 2001
4 Lynch EP, "The impact of postoperative pain on the development of postoperative delirium" 86 : 781-785, 1998
5 Weldon BC, "The effect of caudal analgesia on emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia" 98 : 321-326, 2004
6 Beskow A, "Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than does halothane" 43 : 536-541, 1999
7 Radtke FM, "Risk factors for inadequate emergence after anesthesia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence" 76 : 394-403, 2010
8 Cohen IT, "Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol" 13 : 63-67, 2003
9 Nakayama S, "Propofol reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in preschool-aged children as well as in school-aged children: a comparison with sevoflurane" 21 : 19-23, 2007
10 Moore JK, "Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics" 90 : 461-466, 2003
11 Dalens BJ, "Prevention of emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia for pediatric cerebral magnetic resonance imaging by small doses of ketamine or nalbuphine administered just before discontinuing anesthesia" 102 : 1056-1061, 2006
12 Kain ZN, "Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors" 99 : 1648-1654, 2004
13 Abu-Shahwan I, "Ketamine is effective in decreasing the incidence of emergence agitation in children undergoing dental repair under sevoflurane general anesthesia" 17 : 846-850, 2007
14 Lerman J, "Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery. A comparison with halothane" 84 : 1332-1340, 1996
15 Aono J, "Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys" 87 : 1298-1300, 1997
16 Veyckemans F, "Excitation and delirium during sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients" 68 : 402-405, 2002
17 Lepouse C, "Emergence delirium in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit" 96 : 747-753, 2006
18 Cravero J, "Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane" 10 : 419-424, 2000
19 Yu D, "Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients" 57 : 843-848, 2010
20 Uezono S, "Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients" 91 : 563-566, 2000
21 Wells LT, "Emergence "delirium" after sevoflurane anesthesia: a paranoid delusion?" 88 : 1308-1310, 1999
22 Lapin SL, "Effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane" 9 : 299-304, 1999
23 Abu-Shahwan I, "Effect of propofol on emergence behavior in children after sevoflurane general anesthesia" 18 : 55-59, 2008
24 Isik B, "Dexmedetomidine decreases emergence agitation in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery" 16 : 748-753, 2006
25 Yasuda N, "Comparison of kinetics of sevoflurane and isoflurane in humans" 72 : 316-324, 1991
동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문
-
Air embolism during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery -A case report-
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 장추훈
- 2012
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 신명근
- 2012
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 이인호
- 2012
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 양춘우
- 2012
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
분석정보
인용정보 인용지수 설명보기
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2013-11-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 | |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2010-07-20 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology | |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) |  |
| 2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.1 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.01 |
연관 공개강의(KOCW)
이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료
나만을 위한 추천자료
