RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국기업의 가치혁신 전략 : 제조업을 중심으로 = The Value Innovation Strategy of the Korean Manufacturing Companies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104111739

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The competitive strategies of the Korean manufacturing companies have changed from the “cost leadership”strategy in the early developing stage since 1960’s to the “stuck in the middle” position since 1990's in the face of emerging new cost leaders as the Chinese companies. The data on the strategic contents of the Korean manufacturing companies show that their strategies are seeking the value innovation through not only quality improvement but also cost reduction altogether rather than selecting one on the trade-off relation between the both competitive dimensions. Their strategic actions seem to be seeking the operational efficiencies through all the value chain activities rather than the strategic effectiveness by selecting and focusing on the specific competitive dimension, which is considered as a typical strategic approach. Their strategy seems to be non-strategic in the general sense. But their non-strategically looking behaviors can be reasonable enough for their sandwiched competitive position between the global quality leaders and following cost leaders. This paper explains why their strategies can be right through the theoretical explanations by using the quality-price elasticity approaches for the consumer behaviors. We can call their strategic activities as the value innovation strategy.
    번역하기

    The competitive strategies of the Korean manufacturing companies have changed from the “cost leadership”strategy in the early developing stage since 1960’s to the “stuck in the middle” position since 1990's in the face of emerging new cost l...

    The competitive strategies of the Korean manufacturing companies have changed from the “cost leadership”strategy in the early developing stage since 1960’s to the “stuck in the middle” position since 1990's in the face of emerging new cost leaders as the Chinese companies. The data on the strategic contents of the Korean manufacturing companies show that their strategies are seeking the value innovation through not only quality improvement but also cost reduction altogether rather than selecting one on the trade-off relation between the both competitive dimensions. Their strategic actions seem to be seeking the operational efficiencies through all the value chain activities rather than the strategic effectiveness by selecting and focusing on the specific competitive dimension, which is considered as a typical strategic approach. Their strategy seems to be non-strategic in the general sense. But their non-strategically looking behaviors can be reasonable enough for their sandwiched competitive position between the global quality leaders and following cost leaders. This paper explains why their strategies can be right through the theoretical explanations by using the quality-price elasticity approaches for the consumer behaviors. We can call their strategic activities as the value innovation strategy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 중앙일보, "한국그로벌 기업은 아직 구멍가게"

    2 이순룡, "품질경영론" 법문사 2004

    3 김위찬, "블루오션전략" 교보문고 2005

    4 매일경제신문사, "부즈앨런 & 해밀턴 한국보고서"

    5 한국생산성본부(KPC), "국가생산성대상 기준"

    6 한국생산성본부(KPC), "국가생산성대상 공적서, 2004-2009"

    7 정규석, "경쟁력 원천으로서의 TQM의 위상:일본기업의 국제경쟁력을 중심으로" 27 (27): 67-94, 1999

    8 이장우, "경영전략론" 법문사 1997

    9 Penrose,E.T, "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" John Wiley and Sons 1959

    10 Prahalad,C.K, "The Core Competence of the Corporation" 68 : 79-91, 1990

    1 중앙일보, "한국그로벌 기업은 아직 구멍가게"

    2 이순룡, "품질경영론" 법문사 2004

    3 김위찬, "블루오션전략" 교보문고 2005

    4 매일경제신문사, "부즈앨런 & 해밀턴 한국보고서"

    5 한국생산성본부(KPC), "국가생산성대상 기준"

    6 한국생산성본부(KPC), "국가생산성대상 공적서, 2004-2009"

    7 정규석, "경쟁력 원천으로서의 TQM의 위상:일본기업의 국제경쟁력을 중심으로" 27 (27): 67-94, 1999

    8 이장우, "경영전략론" 법문사 1997

    9 Penrose,E.T, "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" John Wiley and Sons 1959

    10 Prahalad,C.K, "The Core Competence of the Corporation" 68 : 79-91, 1990

    11 Andrews,K.R, "The Concept of Corporate Strategy" Richard D. Irwin 1980

    12 Snow,C.C, "Strategy,Distinctive Competence,and Organizational Performance" 25 (25): 317-336, 1980

    13 Schendel,D.E, "Strategic Management" Little Brown 1979

    14 Imai,M, "Kaizen:The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success"

    15 Wheelwright,S.C, "Japan Where Operat ions are Really Strategic" 67-74, 1981

    16 Poter,M.E, "Competitive Strategy" Free Press 1980

    17 ASQ, "Baldridge National Quality Program:Criteria for Performance Excellence"

    18 Dierickx,I, "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage" 35 (35): 1504-1511, 1989

    19 Wernerfelt,B, "A Resource-based View of the Firm" 5 (5): 171-180, 1984

    20 삼성경제연구소, "2010년 중국기업의 추격과 일본기업의 반격"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.93 1 0.751 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼