RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    쓰기 교육과정중심측정(CBM-W)의 요인 구조에 관한 연구 = Factor Structure of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Writing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102450753

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of curriculum based measurement in writing(CBM-W). A total of 596 elementary school students participated in CBM-W test. The writing samples were scored for 10 different CBM-W indices. This study examined the factor structure of CBM-W using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Major results are summed up as follows. First, principal component analysis supported three-factor structure , with the factor labeled fluency-based indices, accuracy-based indices, and sentence complexity indices respectively. Second, confirmatory factor analysis supported four-factor structure, with the factor labeled fluency-based indices, accuracy-based indices, sentence complexity indices, and spell and punctuation indices respectively. Third, `words per sentence,` `number of sentences`, and `accuracy-based indices` exhibited low reliability and/or high skewness or kurtosis.. The results, limitations of the study, and directions for future research were discussed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of curriculum based measurement in writing(CBM-W). A total of 596 elementary school students participated in CBM-W test. The writing samples were scored for 10 different CBM-W indices. This...

    The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of curriculum based measurement in writing(CBM-W). A total of 596 elementary school students participated in CBM-W test. The writing samples were scored for 10 different CBM-W indices. This study examined the factor structure of CBM-W using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Major results are summed up as follows. First, principal component analysis supported three-factor structure , with the factor labeled fluency-based indices, accuracy-based indices, and sentence complexity indices respectively. Second, confirmatory factor analysis supported four-factor structure, with the factor labeled fluency-based indices, accuracy-based indices, sentence complexity indices, and spell and punctuation indices respectively. Third, `words per sentence,` `number of sentences`, and `accuracy-based indices` exhibited low reliability and/or high skewness or kurtosis.. The results, limitations of the study, and directions for future research were discussed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 여승수, "한국 교육과정중심측정(CBM)의 연구 동향: 측정학적 적합성을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 187-213, 2014

    2 김동일, "학습부진아동의 진단과 중재를 위한 쓰기 검사 체제 개발과 타당화" 교육연구소 4 (4): 43-68, 2003

    3 김선영, "청각장애유아의 쓰기평가를 위한 교육과정중심측정의 활용가능성 탐색" 한국유아특수교육학회 9 (9): 59-77, 2009

    4 여승수, "쓰기학습장애 조기선별을 위한 초등학교 저학년용 CBM 쓰기검사의 측정학적 적합성 연구" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 71-97, 2014

    5 Graham, S., "Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools" Alliance for Excellent Education 2007

    6 Gansle, K. A., "The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students" 35 (35): 435-, 2006

    7 Hayes, J. R., "The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications" Erlbaum 1-27, 1996

    8 Olinghouse, N. G., "The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second-and fourth-grade students" 22 (22): 545-565, 2009

    9 Espin, C. A., "The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students" 38 : 208-217, 2005

    10 Amato, J. M., "The predictivie validity of CBM writing indices for eighth-grade students" 44 (44): 195-204, 2011

    1 여승수, "한국 교육과정중심측정(CBM)의 연구 동향: 측정학적 적합성을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 187-213, 2014

    2 김동일, "학습부진아동의 진단과 중재를 위한 쓰기 검사 체제 개발과 타당화" 교육연구소 4 (4): 43-68, 2003

    3 김선영, "청각장애유아의 쓰기평가를 위한 교육과정중심측정의 활용가능성 탐색" 한국유아특수교육학회 9 (9): 59-77, 2009

    4 여승수, "쓰기학습장애 조기선별을 위한 초등학교 저학년용 CBM 쓰기검사의 측정학적 적합성 연구" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 71-97, 2014

    5 Graham, S., "Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools" Alliance for Excellent Education 2007

    6 Gansle, K. A., "The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students" 35 (35): 435-, 2006

    7 Hayes, J. R., "The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications" Erlbaum 1-27, 1996

    8 Olinghouse, N. G., "The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second-and fourth-grade students" 22 (22): 545-565, 2009

    9 Espin, C. A., "The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students" 38 : 208-217, 2005

    10 Amato, J. M., "The predictivie validity of CBM writing indices for eighth-grade students" 44 (44): 195-204, 2011

    11 Brown, A. J., "The factor structure of curriculum-based writing indices at Grades 3, 7, and 10" Arizona State Univertity 2012

    12 Hosp, M. K., "The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement" Guilford 2007

    13 McMaster, K., "Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing" 41 : 68-84, 2007

    14 Parker, R., "Progress monitoring with objective measures of writing performance for students with mild disabilities" 58 : 61-73, 1991

    15 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis with readings" Prentice-Hall 1998

    16 Wagner, R. K., "Modeling the devleopment of written language" 24 : 203-220, 2011

    17 Pett, M. A., "Making sense of factor analysis" Sage 2003

    18 Tindal, G., "Identifying measures for evaluating written expression" 6 : 211-218, 1991

    19 Hooper, S. R., "Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues" Brookes 375-417, 1994

    20 Fabrigar, L. R., "Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research" 4 : 272-299, 1999

    21 Kim, Y, "Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition" 57 : 19-211, 2014

    22 Deno, S. L., "Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative" 52 : 219-232, 1985

    23 Espin, C. A., "Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary school students" 15 : 5-27, 1999

    24 Mercer, S. H., "Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measurement in writing with narrative and expository prompts relative to passage copying speed in 10th grade students" 27 (27): 85-95, 2012

    25 김선영, "CBM을 활용한 청각장애 학생의 쓰기 표현 평가" 한국특수교육학회 39 (39): 97-120, 2004

    26 Malecki, C., "Best practices in school psychology V" NASP 477-488, 2008

    27 Tindal, G., "Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs" 23 : 169-183, 1989

    28 Berninger, V., "Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers" 34 : 23-52, 1996

    29 Puranik, C. S., "Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm" 17 : 107-120, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼