상생윤리의 교육 범례 = A Study on the Mutual-Living`s Educational Paradigms

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, we focus on three educational paradigms in the context of mutual living ethics in Korea. First of all, Jeung-San(1871-1909) define resentment and regret as social and personal insufficiency and Won(寃) as group`s revenge emotions. Jeung-San believed that the root of these dissatisfactions of Won(寃) can be solved mutual living`s mind in educational paradigm according to Three World`s Heaven Earth Public Affairs. Jeong-San(1900-1962), the second Master of Won-Buddhism established the ideal civilized society that is formed on the basis of Triple Identity ethics. The global village causes more problems than any other period and jeopardizes human survival. Among many problems such as ecocide, religious violence, aggressive warfare and terrorism, nuclear weapons and destruction of humanity, educational paradigm of public mutual living can solve these various antagonism. This paper is oriented to find out educational paradigm in the mutual living`s ethics and practice among Jeung-San Master and Jeong San Master`s Triple Identity ethics with You Yuong-Mo(1890-1981)`s Public Redemption. Firstly, mutual living`s mind in educational paradigm includes the educational meaning of media function with other resentment and regret tradition as the public common value. The principle of public communication and cooperation among revenge emotions can be easily found in mutual living ethical thoughts. Secondly, the human life can be found diverse complexity as private with other lives in Triple Identity ethics. To create a harmonious education to keep human being esteem, and public communication as human dignity must be the solutions to various antagonism and many conflicts of the world. Thirdly, Public Redemption can create the new educational environment of peace and mutual- living mode beyond ideological conflicts and different belief systems. To establish the world of mutual living, the mutual harmonious educational paradigms are very important. In conclusion, mutual living is trans-versal values that require global responsibility for prosperity and happiness and community of rights and global citizenship. Mutual Harmony and Public mutual living with Pubic Redemption can serve common goodness as ethical education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 천이두, "한의 구조연구" 문학과 지성사 1994

2 양은용, "한국종교사상사에서 본 신종교" 23 : 1998

3 노길명, "한국신흥종교연구" 경세원 1996

4 김홍철, "한국신종교사상의 연구" 집문당 1989

5 박정훈, "한 울안 한 이치에" 원불교출판사 1982

6 Hans Küng, "하나의 지구윤리에 대한 긍정적 대답(Yes to a Global Ethic" SCM Press 1996

7 유영모, "천부경 풀이, in: 다석 사상으로 본 불교, 반야심경" 도서출판 두레

8 최봉영, "주체와 욕망" 사계절 2004

9 임상욱, "윤리 이야기" 청호 2004

10 김용환, "세계윤리교육" 도서출판 개신(충북대 출판부) 2009

11 앤더슨, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" 사회비평사 1996

12 Art Bell, "더워지는 지구 얼어붙는 지구" 아르케 2001

13 팩 브라운, "다문화주의 윤리학" 철학과현실사 2009

14 이정배, "간(間)문화 해석학과 신학적 상상력" 감리교신학대학교 출판부 2005

15 원불교원광사, "鼎山宗師法說集" 원광사 1962

16 "『典經』『道典』『圓佛敎全書』『天符經』"

17 Ervin Laszlo, "You Can Change the World Change the World" 유토피아 2005

18 Hans Küng-Helmut Schmidt, "A Global Ethic and Global Responsibilities" SCM Press 1998