RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    경영판단원칙의 도입가능성에 관한 검토 = A Study on the Introduction of Business Judgement Rule in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76504929

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For the execution of company business by directors, various management judgements are required. Directors venture on risk management. If they make an overall judgement by using the knowledge as a professional manager, it is necessary to hold legal judgement in suspense or to exempt them from personal liability in consideration of the uncertain and flexible elements of management judgement. Though directors of corporation make decisions in good faith, with due care, and for the best interests of the company, their decisions may lead to damage to the company because of unpredictable economic situation or passive, flexible factors. It is necessary to handle management failure differently from simple mistakes or liability with fault.
    However, the introduction of Business Judgement Rule doesn't automatically recognize discretionary power in management for directors widely. Instead, action norms of directors are expected as a prior effect when Business judgement Rule is introduced. Also, the function to present legal norms of a court is expected as a post effect.
    From this viewpoint, introducing Business judgement Rule to Korean commercial law in limitation can seek the profits of diverse people concerned around company. In addition, it presents criteria for the range of lawful discretionary power to directors, requiring directors' responsible management. Therefore, it needs to be examined positively.
    번역하기

    For the execution of company business by directors, various management judgements are required. Directors venture on risk management. If they make an overall judgement by using the knowledge as a professional manager, it is necessary to hold legal jud...

    For the execution of company business by directors, various management judgements are required. Directors venture on risk management. If they make an overall judgement by using the knowledge as a professional manager, it is necessary to hold legal judgement in suspense or to exempt them from personal liability in consideration of the uncertain and flexible elements of management judgement. Though directors of corporation make decisions in good faith, with due care, and for the best interests of the company, their decisions may lead to damage to the company because of unpredictable economic situation or passive, flexible factors. It is necessary to handle management failure differently from simple mistakes or liability with fault.
    However, the introduction of Business Judgement Rule doesn't automatically recognize discretionary power in management for directors widely. Instead, action norms of directors are expected as a prior effect when Business judgement Rule is introduced. Also, the function to present legal norms of a court is expected as a post effect.
    From this viewpoint, introducing Business judgement Rule to Korean commercial law in limitation can seek the profits of diverse people concerned around company. In addition, it presents criteria for the range of lawful discretionary power to directors, requiring directors' responsible management. Therefore, it needs to be examined positively.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 외국(미국ㆍ일본)에서의 논의
    • Ⅲ. 법령위반과 이사의 책임
    • Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 도입 필요성
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 외국(미국ㆍ일본)에서의 논의
    • Ⅲ. 법령위반과 이사의 책임
    • Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 도입 필요성
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈ABSTRACT〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-08-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Chungnam National University Law Resarch Institute -> Chungnam National University Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-12-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Law KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.74 0.79 0.817 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼