RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    『세기와 더불어』를 통해 추출한 북한의 전략문화 인식틀 = Framing North Korea`s Strategic Culture From With the Century

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99807465

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Is North Korea a ``crazy country``? Lots of observers and researchers have tried to read a specific pattern in North Korean provocative military behaviors. However, it seems clear that most of those efforts that have been made so far in the context of its material interest, purpose or motive, etc. has many restrictions in their explaining power. In this regard, this research suggests an alternative methodology to solve this puzzle in the context of ``strategic culture``. The concept of strategic culture was born in 1970s and has passed through intense theoretical debates in academia. The main argument of the theory is: military policy or decision-making of a specific country is under the influence of the milieu consisting of ideational factors like its culture or way of thinking, even if it does not accord with material interest of physical situation. This research focuses on the memoir of Kim Il Sung, With the Century, as a key text in tracing North Korean strategic culture. The memoir is recognized as the only text elucidating Kim`s own principles or lessons about specific and detailed military issues. In this context, this research deconstructed the whole text of the memoir into 390 units, which contain views about military strategy, tactics, operational doctrine, construction of military capability, use of military measures, etc. Through this process, 11 key messages representing North Korean strategic culture (3 about Identity and Threat Perception, 4 about Norms, 4 about Policy Preference) were extracted, and the inter-relation among such messages were visualized. The main flow identified from those messages was as follows: ? Imperialistic threats of United States or Japan are overwhelming; NK is under constanct threat from them; and international institutions like the United Nations are built for the interest of imperialist countries. ? Diplomatic measures can`t buy any object and only armed conflict is absolutely important. ? The power of optimistic will or solid ideology is more important than physical capability. ? Asymmetric strategy, tactics, and weapon systems to attack the enemy`s rear or core are preferred. ? When the objective situation is unfavorable, showing off the offensive attitude pays off.
    번역하기

    Is North Korea a ``crazy country``? Lots of observers and researchers have tried to read a specific pattern in North Korean provocative military behaviors. However, it seems clear that most of those efforts that have been made so far in the context of...

    Is North Korea a ``crazy country``? Lots of observers and researchers have tried to read a specific pattern in North Korean provocative military behaviors. However, it seems clear that most of those efforts that have been made so far in the context of its material interest, purpose or motive, etc. has many restrictions in their explaining power. In this regard, this research suggests an alternative methodology to solve this puzzle in the context of ``strategic culture``. The concept of strategic culture was born in 1970s and has passed through intense theoretical debates in academia. The main argument of the theory is: military policy or decision-making of a specific country is under the influence of the milieu consisting of ideational factors like its culture or way of thinking, even if it does not accord with material interest of physical situation. This research focuses on the memoir of Kim Il Sung, With the Century, as a key text in tracing North Korean strategic culture. The memoir is recognized as the only text elucidating Kim`s own principles or lessons about specific and detailed military issues. In this context, this research deconstructed the whole text of the memoir into 390 units, which contain views about military strategy, tactics, operational doctrine, construction of military capability, use of military measures, etc. Through this process, 11 key messages representing North Korean strategic culture (3 about Identity and Threat Perception, 4 about Norms, 4 about Policy Preference) were extracted, and the inter-relation among such messages were visualized. The main flow identified from those messages was as follows: ? Imperialistic threats of United States or Japan are overwhelming; NK is under constanct threat from them; and international institutions like the United Nations are built for the interest of imperialist countries. ? Diplomatic measures can`t buy any object and only armed conflict is absolutely important. ? The power of optimistic will or solid ideology is more important than physical capability. ? Asymmetric strategy, tactics, and weapon systems to attack the enemy`s rear or core are preferred. ? When the objective situation is unfavorable, showing off the offensive attitude pays off.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박한우, "한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용 : Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로" 한국자료분석학회 6 (6): 1377-1387, 2004

    2 정성장, "주체사상의 형성 변화의 논리체계, In 북한의 정치 2" 경인문화사 2006

    3 와다 하루끼, "역사로서의 사회주의" 창작과비평사 1994

    4 한국학중앙연구원, "세기와 더불어’ 항목, In 한국민족문화대백과" 한국학중앙연구원 2009

    5 조선로동당중앙위원회, "세기와 더불어. 8" 조선로동당출판사 1998

    6 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 6" 조선로동당출판사 1995

    7 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 5" 조선로동당출판사 1994

    8 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 2" 조선로동당출판사 1992

    9 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 1" 조선로동당출판사 1992

    10 황일도, "북한의 전략문화와 군사행태 : 핵무기 개발, 재래식전력 배치, 연평도 포격 사례를 중심으로" 연세대학교 대학원 2013

    1 박한우, "한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용 : Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로" 한국자료분석학회 6 (6): 1377-1387, 2004

    2 정성장, "주체사상의 형성 변화의 논리체계, In 북한의 정치 2" 경인문화사 2006

    3 와다 하루끼, "역사로서의 사회주의" 창작과비평사 1994

    4 한국학중앙연구원, "세기와 더불어’ 항목, In 한국민족문화대백과" 한국학중앙연구원 2009

    5 조선로동당중앙위원회, "세기와 더불어. 8" 조선로동당출판사 1998

    6 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 6" 조선로동당출판사 1995

    7 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 5" 조선로동당출판사 1994

    8 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 2" 조선로동당출판사 1992

    9 김일성, "세기와 더불어. 1" 조선로동당출판사 1992

    10 황일도, "북한의 전략문화와 군사행태 : 핵무기 개발, 재래식전력 배치, 연평도 포격 사례를 중심으로" 연세대학교 대학원 2013

    11 백학순, "북한 권력의 역사 : 사상, 정체성, 구조" 한울아카데미 2010

    12 예대열, "『세기와 더불어』에 서술된 북한 민족해방운동사 인식의 변화상과 함의" 한국근현대사학회 55 (55): 237-273, 2010

    13 Snyder, Jack, "The Soviet Strategic Culture : Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations" Rand Corporation 1977

    14 Axelrod, Robert M, "Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites" Princeton University Press 1976

    15 Johnson, Jeannie L., "Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction : Culturally Based Insights into Comparative National Security Policymaking" Palgrave Macmillan 2009

    16 Duffield, John S., "Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism" 53 (53): 1999

    17 Glenn, John, "Neorealism versus strategic culture" Ashgate 2003

    18 Legro, Jeffrey, "Military Culture and Inadvertent Escalation in World War II" 18 (18): 1994

    19 Berger, Thomas U, "Cultures of antimilitarism : national security in Germany and Japan" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1998

    20 Desch, Michael C., "Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies" 23 (23): 1998

    21 Johnston, Alastair I, "Cultural realism : strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history" Princeton University Press 1995

    22 Legro, Jeffrey, "Cooperation under fire : Anglo·German restraint during World War II" Cornell University Press 1995

    23 Farrell, Theo, "Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program" 4 (4): 2002

    24 Gray, Colin S, "Comparative Strategic Culture" 14 (14): 1984

    25 Wendt, Alexander, "Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics" 46 (46): 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.32 1.32 1.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.12 1.1 1.848 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼