부동산 시장의 위기극복을 위한 금융정책의 역할 평가 = Evaluating the Role of Financial Policy Overcoming Real Estate Market Crises in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the IMF crisis, the structures of real estate economy have rapidly shifted toward capitalization, securitization and globalization. Due to these trends, indirect financial policies (i.e. interest control and loan regulation) rather than direct intervention means have been requested in real estate policy. However, the means of real estate policy could not cope with the sharp rise of real estate price and overcome crises in the real estate market because of insufficient preparation to cope with rapidly changing environments of real estate market.
The aim of this paper is to analyze the roles of financial policy in overcoming the crises of the real estate market and to suggest the desirable measure of financial policies for the future. This paper analyses how the relations between real estate economy and capital and financial market have s changed since the IMF crisis and evaluates the meanings and limits of real estate policies to cope with the 2005 boom crisis and 2008 bust crisis.
The results analyzing the impact of financial policy on the boom of real estate price in 2005 and the bust in 2008 are as follows: (a) the Roh Administration could not control the sharp rise in real estate price in 2005, because of its late use of financial policies like LTV and DTI control and poor management of loan control. Roh Goverment focused on the traditional direct means of real estate policies like increase of property taxes, redemption of development gains, expansion of housing supply and housing welfare.; (b) However, Lee Government chooses the deregulation, by which it expands expanding the housing supply and demand in real estate market for the prevention of collapse of real estate price. The deregulation policy for housing supply increase and the demand expansion policy through LTV and DTI deregulation could be expected to prevent collapse of real estate price, but in the end could also hamper the autonomous restructuring of the real estate market and self-regulating real estate price.
This paper emphasizes that further real estate policiesy should be developed to reflect its the inter-relationship with financial policy. Furthermore, for the stabilization of real estate market, a good balanced combination of macro- and micro financial policies should be considered. Finally, this paper emphasizes the role of financial pol

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김양렬외, "프로젝트 파이낸싱과 ABS 를 통한 주택금융" 한국응용경제학회 2 (2): 71-91, 2000

2 정준호, "참여정부의 부동산정책 평가: 주택시장의 가격안정화 정책을 중심으로" 한국사회과학연구회 (74) : 115-158, 2008

3 변창흠, "참여정부 부동산정책의 이념과 형성과정 분석" 2006

4 김수현, "주택정책의 원칙과 쟁점" 한울 2008

5 김자봉, "주택시장 유동성관리수단으로서의 지급준비율정책" 한국금융연구원 16 (16): 14-15, 2007

6 경제개혁연대, "정부의 건설사 지원 대책 관련 의견서" 2008

7 국민경제자문회의, "정부 부동산정책보고서" 2007

8 선대인, "위험한 경제학" 더난출판 2009

9 김광수, "위기의 한국경제" Haman and Books 2008

10 황상연, "위기와 정부의 역할: 대공황이후 미국의 주택금융정책과 서브프라임 사태, 경기개발연구원 정책연구" 2009

11 홍종학, "약탈적 대출에 대한 소고" 12 (12): 239-265, 2005

12 이종권, "신정부 부동산정책과 시장 전망" 2008

13 정준호, "시장패러다임의 변화와 노무현 정부의 부동산 정책. in: 위기의 부동산: 시장만능주의를 넘어서" 후마니타스 2008

14 박원갑, "부동산의 미래쇼크" 리더스북 2010

15 변창흠, "부동산 시장 팽창주의와 이명박 정부의 부동산 정책. in: 위기의 부동산" 후마니타스 2009

16 하준경, "부동산 버블, 금융위기설, 그리고 정책의 신뢰성" 16 (16): 2007

17 변창흠, "부동산 경제의 구조와 금융정책을 통한 위기극복의 한계" 2010

18 임병진, "미국 금융위기가 한국 부동산 시장과 외환시장에 미친 영향에 관한 연구" 2010

19 정호성, "단카이 세대 은퇴에 따른 일본 부동산 시장의 변화와 전망" 2010

20 한동근, "금융위기는 부동산 거품과 어떤 관계가 있는가?" 29 : 1-18, 2003

21 김광수, "경제학 3.0" 더난 출판 2008

22 안균오, "개발이익 환수규모 추정과 개발부담금제도 개선방안 연구" 한국공간환경학회 33 (33): 48-76, 2010

23 Minsky, H., "Stabilizing an Unstable Economy" Yale University Press 1986

24 Hudson, Michael, "Real Estate and the Capital Gains Debate" The Jerome Levy Economics Institute of Bard College 1997

25 Ingves, S., "Housing and Monetary Policy, Sceriges Risk Bank" 2007

26 Gerlach, S., "Banking lending and Property Price in Hongkong" 29 : 461-481, 2005

27 통계청, "2005 인구주택총조사보고서" 2006

28 국토해양부, "10월 말 기준 전국 미분양주택 현황 공개" 국토해양부 2010