RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    증권애널리스트와 공정공시제도 = Analysts and Regulation FD(Fair Disclosure)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76397606

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Regulation FD is a new issuer disclosure rule that restrict selective disclosure of material nonpublic information. Selective disclosure is the practice by which companies release material nonpublic information to selected insiders before disclosing the information to the general public. Even where selective disclosures benefit investors through an increase in the amount of information in the market, resulting in greater price accuracy, such disclosures may also impose a cost on uniformed investors. In addition, when issuers selectively disclose material information, those in possession of the information prior to the public release are capable of making profits or avoiding losses at the expense of the uninformed. Through the adoption of Regulation FD, the Financial Supervisory Service of our nation intend to eliminate public companies's selective disclosure of important nonpublic information to analysts etc., before making full disclosure of the same information to the public.
    Regulation FD, however, leads to the negative effects on analysts. Those who stand to lose the most from the passage of Regulation FD are the securities analysts who are no longer able to obtain advance notice of material developments from the corporate that they cover. Analysts may undertake to assess regularly the value of a corporation and transmit this information to the general investing public. This assessment may combine both material and immaterial information obtained from the company as well as other information sources at the analyst's disposal. Such information may help increase the accuracy of share price, reducing the mispri챠ng risk facing the company's investors.
    The adoption of Regulation FD negatively affects the market by increasing volatility and decreasing the quality and quantity of information disclosed to the public, because it will have a chilling effect on the disclosure of information by issuers. It is leads to the reducing the role of analysts because they should always be needed information to analyze the value of a company' securities.
    In order to increase the positive role of analysts, it is necessary to ensure access to material and immaterial information of the company, In this sense, the adoption of Regulation FD has many problems in our securities market. It is necessary to reexamine this rule. therefore, for activating the affirmative role of analysts.
    번역하기

    Regulation FD is a new issuer disclosure rule that restrict selective disclosure of material nonpublic information. Selective disclosure is the practice by which companies release material nonpublic information to selected insiders before disclosing t...

    Regulation FD is a new issuer disclosure rule that restrict selective disclosure of material nonpublic information. Selective disclosure is the practice by which companies release material nonpublic information to selected insiders before disclosing the information to the general public. Even where selective disclosures benefit investors through an increase in the amount of information in the market, resulting in greater price accuracy, such disclosures may also impose a cost on uniformed investors. In addition, when issuers selectively disclose material information, those in possession of the information prior to the public release are capable of making profits or avoiding losses at the expense of the uninformed. Through the adoption of Regulation FD, the Financial Supervisory Service of our nation intend to eliminate public companies's selective disclosure of important nonpublic information to analysts etc., before making full disclosure of the same information to the public.
    Regulation FD, however, leads to the negative effects on analysts. Those who stand to lose the most from the passage of Regulation FD are the securities analysts who are no longer able to obtain advance notice of material developments from the corporate that they cover. Analysts may undertake to assess regularly the value of a corporation and transmit this information to the general investing public. This assessment may combine both material and immaterial information obtained from the company as well as other information sources at the analyst's disposal. Such information may help increase the accuracy of share price, reducing the mispri챠ng risk facing the company's investors.
    The adoption of Regulation FD negatively affects the market by increasing volatility and decreasing the quality and quantity of information disclosed to the public, because it will have a chilling effect on the disclosure of information by issuers. It is leads to the reducing the role of analysts because they should always be needed information to analyze the value of a company' securities.
    In order to increase the positive role of analysts, it is necessary to ensure access to material and immaterial information of the company, In this sense, the adoption of Regulation FD has many problems in our securities market. It is necessary to reexamine this rule. therefore, for activating the affirmative role of analysts.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 애널리스트의 역할과 규제체제
    • 3. 공정공시제도의 도입에 따른 영향 및 문제점
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 애널리스트의 역할과 규제체제
    • 3. 공정공시제도의 도입에 따른 영향 및 문제점
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼