RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Teaching and Learning Hedging in Academic Writing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103969656

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to reveal cultural and linguistic differences in hedging for the purpose of enhancing the pedagogy of writing instruction for English language learners. Thirty research article introductions were selected from two journals in the field of ESL/EFL education, English Teaching from Korea and TESOL Quarterly from the United States. The results showed that Korean writers tended not to hedge their statements to such a great extent, but are assertive, whereas Korean writers writing English introductions and native English-speaking writers appeared to favor hedging; more frequent use of hedging appeared in indicating a research gap in the field or announcing the implications of the study. For native English-speaking scholars in this study, hedging was considered a polite device in academic writing to gain acceptance for their statements, whereas Korean scholars considered hedging an indication of authors’ uncertainty. These differences can be utilized in teaching so as to enable students studying English to make appropriate choices about the way they write research papers in English.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to reveal cultural and linguistic differences in hedging for the purpose of enhancing the pedagogy of writing instruction for English language learners. Thirty research article introductions were selected from two journals...

    The purpose of the study was to reveal cultural and linguistic differences in hedging for the purpose of enhancing the pedagogy of writing instruction for English language learners. Thirty research article introductions were selected from two journals in the field of ESL/EFL education, English Teaching from Korea and TESOL Quarterly from the United States. The results showed that Korean writers tended not to hedge their statements to such a great extent, but are assertive, whereas Korean writers writing English introductions and native English-speaking writers appeared to favor hedging; more frequent use of hedging appeared in indicating a research gap in the field or announcing the implications of the study. For native English-speaking scholars in this study, hedging was considered a polite device in academic writing to gain acceptance for their statements, whereas Korean scholars considered hedging an indication of authors’ uncertainty. These differences can be utilized in teaching so as to enable students studying English to make appropriate choices about the way they write research papers in English.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "Written academic discourse in Korean Implications for effective communication Writing across languages Analysis of second language text" 153-168, 1987

    2 "Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a Standard model?" 42 (42): 38-46, 1999

    3 "Towards a validated analysis of scientific structure" 7 57-70, 1986

    4 Myers, "The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles" 1-35, 1989

    5 "Textual structure of Korean speakers’ argumentative essays in English" 129-142, 1988

    6 "Some universals in language usage" Cambridge University Press 1987

    7 "On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers" 123-140, 1981

    8 "On hedging in social science written texts University of Michigan Press" 1981

    9 "On hedging in physicianphysician discourse" Prince Ablex Publishing Corporation 83-97, 1982

    10 "Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum" 24 (24): 477-490, 1996

    1 "Written academic discourse in Korean Implications for effective communication Writing across languages Analysis of second language text" 153-168, 1987

    2 "Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a Standard model?" 42 (42): 38-46, 1999

    3 "Towards a validated analysis of scientific structure" 7 57-70, 1986

    4 Myers, "The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles" 1-35, 1989

    5 "Textual structure of Korean speakers’ argumentative essays in English" 129-142, 1988

    6 "Some universals in language usage" Cambridge University Press 1987

    7 "On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers" 123-140, 1981

    8 "On hedging in social science written texts University of Michigan Press" 1981

    9 "On hedging in physicianphysician discourse" Prince Ablex Publishing Corporation 83-97, 1982

    10 "Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum" 24 (24): 477-490, 1996

    11 "Hedging in scientific research articles." John Benjamins Publishing Company 1998

    12 "Hedging in newswriting Beads or bracelets" Oxford University Press 172-181, 1987

    13 "Hedging and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse English for Specific Purposes" 149-170, 1994

    14 "English in academic and research settings" Cambridge University Press 1990

    15 "Care and maintenance of hedges" 37-43, 1988

    16 "Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills." University of Michigan Press. 2004

    17 "Academic writing for graduate students A course for non-native speakers of English University of Michigan Press" 1994

    18 "A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts Journal of Philosophical Logic" 458-508, 1972

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼