韩语母语者的“字感”研究 -以独体形近字为例- = A Study of “Word Sense” in Native Korean Speakers -The Case of Unicode Close-Up Characters-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper systematically examines 527 sets of morphologically similar characters in the International Chinese Language Education Chinese Language Proficiency Level Standards. Out of which, there were 140 unique sets of close characters that could be classified into four types based on stroke count, stroke form, stroke combination, and stroke position. The eye-tracking experiments revealed that Korean native speakers share the same processing mechanism for the four types of unique Chinese characters as Chinese native speakers. The recognition rate of the four types of unique characters is consistent, and the processing of unique characters aligns with the hypothesis of partial processing. This indicates that Korean native speakers possess similar cognitive processing mechanisms for Chinese characters and enjoy the advantage of “word sense”.Korean native speakers exhibit longer response times in recognizing the four types of strokes, along with lower recognition rates for correctly identifying stroke position corresponding to words. Additionally, the first gaze time for stroke position was shorter compared to the other three types, while the stroke position and stroke form types were found to have a significantly higher number of gaze points compared to the stroke combination relationship and stroke number categories. This study indicates that Korean native speakers with intermediate to advanced proficiency in Chinese have not yet achieved the level of native Chinese speakers. Additionally, there is a gradient in the difficulty of acquiring specific features of close characters with stroke position and stroke form being more challenging to acquire compared to stroke combination relationship and stroke quantity. The paper offers a thorough analysis of the underlying reasons and presents several teaching recommendations.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 안상수, "한글자형의 원형태 연구" 598-610, 1992

2 안병희, "민족의 글자 한글: 신세기록별전" 174-183, 2000

3 燕艮秀, "韩国汉语零基础学生的汉字偏误分析及教学策略——以韩国光州金龟初中为例" 辽宁师范大学 2013

4 河永三, "韩国汉字教育历史回顾和现状分析" 1 : 208-212, 2011

5 黄新萍, "韩国小学汉字教学研究" 沈阳师范大学 2014

6 金莲姬, "韩国小学汉字教学现状调查与分析" 扬州大学 2015

7 朴恩实, "韩国学生汉字错字成因研究" 华东师范大学 2011

8 罗慧兰, "韩国《汉字能力检定考试大纲》与《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准, 汉字部分》对比研究" 广东外语外贸大学 2020

9 张思童, "针对韩国不同年龄段汉语学习者的初级汉字教学研究" 兰州交通大学 2022

10 白剑波, "试论非汉字文化圈学生的字感培养与获得" 5 : 104-105, 2006

11 徐彩华, "汉语二语学习者汉字识别中的整体/成分加工倾向研究" 1 : 56-69, 2023

12 周颖, "汉语二语学习者双字词加工方式研究" 1 : 111-126, 2023

13 杨剑峰, "汉字阅读的联结主义模型" 5 : 516-522, 2008

14 梁彦民, "汉字部件区别特征与对外汉字教学" 4 : 76-80, 2004

15 伍秋萍, "汉字认读在汉语二语者入学分班测试中的应用——建构简易汉语能力鉴别指标的实证研究" 1 : 395-411, 2017

16 王惠萍, "汉字整体和笔画频率对笔画认知的影响" 1 : 17-22, 2003

17 喻柏林, "汉字字形知觉的整合性对部件认知的影响" 4 : 306-309, 1998

18 郭德俊, "汉字字形特征及单词使用频率对汉字识别的影响" 四川科学技术出版社 1991

19 管益杰, "汉字字形加工的关键特征模型" 2 : 126-129, 2006

20 潘先军, "汉字基础在韩国留学生汉语学习中的负迁移" 3 : 62-64, 2004

21 彭聃龄, "汉字加工的基本单元 : 来自笔画数效应和部件数效应的证据" 1 : 8-16, 1997

22 张积家, "整体与部分的意义关系对汉字知觉的影响"第5期" 5 : 1095-1098, 2007

23 胡发稳, "大学生中文独体字知觉加工效应" 5 : 617-624, 2023

24 刘丽媛, "基于韩国留学生汉语中介语语料库的汉字偏误研究及应用" 鲁东大学 2013

25 郎尊, "国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》词汇表收錄变化分析——以初等词汇为例" 3 : 167-171, 2023

26 "国际中文教育中文水平等级标准"

27 彭滔, "初级阶段韩国学生汉字习得偏误分析及教学对策" 湖南师范大学 2015

28 刘姝, "初级阶段非汉字文化圈学生"字感"的培养及汉字教学" 1 : 137-141, 2013

29 石定果, "关于对外汉字教学的调查报告" 1 : 36-48, 1998

30 张积家, "义符认知功能的心理语言学探索" 光明日报出版社 2022

31 赵燕, "中亚留学生汉字识别的眼动研究" 新疆师范大学 2012

32 WU ZHEN ; 맹주억, "中、高级韩国学习者汉字学习难点分析" 한국중국어교육학회 (33) : 79-106, 2021

33 徐晶晶, "不同汉语水平的二语学习者注音文本阅读的眼动研究" 4 : 548-561, 2021

34 Taft, M., "Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition" 4 : 498-519, 1999

35 Jiang, N., "Analytic visual word recognition among Chinese L2learners" 2 : 540-558, 2022

36 Jiang, Nan, "Analytic Versus Holistic Recognition of Chinese Words Among L2 Learners" 3 : 1-11, 2020