RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    이탈리아 신합리주의 건축의 설계방법론에 관한 연구 = A Study on Design Methodology of Neo-Rationalism Architecture in Italy

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research aims to investigate perspectives by which Italian Neo-Rationalism architects attempted to analyse urban and process how they introduced architectural typology theory into their works. The architectural typology theory has been mentioned by modern architects when they attempt to reconstruct the spirit of place and historicity those are lost in modern architects. In this paper, perspectives for analysing urban concepts and design process in introducing architectural typology theory are mentioned by focusing Aldo Rossi, Carlo Aymonino, and Giorgio Grassi representative Italian Neo-Rationalism architects. As a conclusion, comparisons between the all are presented: Aldo Rossi considers the urban as an assembly of various parts and values the formation whereas Carlo Aymonino approaches the urban based on functional relationships between various parts and gives more attentions to the function in architectural typology. Finally, Giorigio Grassi considers the city as the logical construction including historical consistency and permanence. As a sequence, he regards only the fundamental archetypical typology as the permanent aspect. For this reason, his works have been existed by means of the moderate and ascetic manner consisting of constructing orders and rules.
    번역하기

    This research aims to investigate perspectives by which Italian Neo-Rationalism architects attempted to analyse urban and process how they introduced architectural typology theory into their works. The architectural typology theory has been mentioned ...

    This research aims to investigate perspectives by which Italian Neo-Rationalism architects attempted to analyse urban and process how they introduced architectural typology theory into their works. The architectural typology theory has been mentioned by modern architects when they attempt to reconstruct the spirit of place and historicity those are lost in modern architects. In this paper, perspectives for analysing urban concepts and design process in introducing architectural typology theory are mentioned by focusing Aldo Rossi, Carlo Aymonino, and Giorgio Grassi representative Italian Neo-Rationalism architects. As a conclusion, comparisons between the all are presented: Aldo Rossi considers the urban as an assembly of various parts and values the formation whereas Carlo Aymonino approaches the urban based on functional relationships between various parts and gives more attentions to the function in architectural typology. Finally, Giorigio Grassi considers the city as the logical construction including historical consistency and permanence. As a sequence, he regards only the fundamental archetypical typology as the permanent aspect. For this reason, his works have been existed by means of the moderate and ascetic manner consisting of constructing orders and rules.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "현대건축사조개관" 기문당 1995

    2 "한국현대건축의 미적 특성에 관한 연구" 1989

    3 "서양현대건축" 보성출판사 1999

    4 "도시형태와 현대건축의 관계" 1998

    5 "도시형태와 현대건축의 관계" 1998

    6 "건축의 표현체계" 기문당 1999

    7 "I Progetti" 1996

    8 "Architettura della citta'" 1995

    9 "Architectural monographs" 1996

    10 "'Typology as a Form of Convention'" -6, 1985

    1 "현대건축사조개관" 기문당 1995

    2 "한국현대건축의 미적 특성에 관한 연구" 1989

    3 "서양현대건축" 보성출판사 1999

    4 "도시형태와 현대건축의 관계" 1998

    5 "도시형태와 현대건축의 관계" 1998

    6 "건축의 표현체계" 기문당 1999

    7 "I Progetti" 1996

    8 "Architettura della citta'" 1995

    9 "Architectural monographs" 1996

    10 "'Typology as a Form of Convention'" -6, 1985

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
    외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼