RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공정거래법상 ‘특수관계인’ 규정의 문제점과 개선방향 = The issues of the provisions on the ‘Specially Related Person’ in the Korean Competition Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104834800

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person with special interest' can be useful solution for the problems. There are various types of provisions on the concept in many Korean laws.
      The Korean Competition Law (Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act) also uses this concept in many provisions. For example, Article 7 of the act provides that no one shall, directly or through the person with special interest, practically suppress competition by conducting several practices. Article 23 prescribes that no enterpriser shall commit the unfair trade practices. Sub paragraph 7 of the article provides that an act “assisting a person with a special interest or other companies by providing advanced payment, loans, manpower, immovable assets, stocks and bonds, or intellectual properties there to, or by transacting under substantially favourable terms therewith” is one of the unfair trade practices.
      Although the provisions may be useful to regulate several issues of certain field of competition law such as unfair trade practices and combination of enterprises, they have some problems and have been criticised in several legal points of view. Many issues can be analysed or examined. For example, the ‘Specially Related Person’ who is relative is on the centre of the issues.
      This study is aimed to figure out the problems and device improvement of the provisions concerning the ‘Specially Related Person’ in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.
      번역하기

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person w...

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person with special interest' can be useful solution for the problems. There are various types of provisions on the concept in many Korean laws.
      The Korean Competition Law (Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act) also uses this concept in many provisions. For example, Article 7 of the act provides that no one shall, directly or through the person with special interest, practically suppress competition by conducting several practices. Article 23 prescribes that no enterpriser shall commit the unfair trade practices. Sub paragraph 7 of the article provides that an act “assisting a person with a special interest or other companies by providing advanced payment, loans, manpower, immovable assets, stocks and bonds, or intellectual properties there to, or by transacting under substantially favourable terms therewith” is one of the unfair trade practices.
      Although the provisions may be useful to regulate several issues of certain field of competition law such as unfair trade practices and combination of enterprises, they have some problems and have been criticised in several legal points of view. Many issues can be analysed or examined. For example, the ‘Specially Related Person’ who is relative is on the centre of the issues.
      This study is aimed to figure out the problems and device improvement of the provisions concerning the ‘Specially Related Person’ in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person with special interest' can be useful solution for the problems. There are various types of provisions on the concept in many Korean laws.
      The Korean Competition Law (Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act) also uses this concept in many provisions. For example, Article 7 of the act provides that no one shall, directly or through the person with special interest, practically suppress competition by conducting several practices. Article 23 prescribes that no enterpriser shall commit the unfair trade practices. Sub paragraph 7 of the article provides that an act “assisting a person with a special interest or other companies by providing advanced payment, loans, manpower, immovable assets, stocks and bonds, or intellectual properties there to, or by transacting under substantially favourable terms therewith” is one of the unfair trade practices.
      Although the provisions may be useful to regulate several issues of certain field of competition law such as unfair trade practices and combination of enterprises, they have some problems and have been criticised in several legal points of view. Many issues can be analysed or examined. For example, the ‘Specially Related Person’ who is relative is on the centre of the issues.
      This study is aimed to figure out the problems and device improvement of the provisions concerning the ‘Specially Related Person’ in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.
      번역하기

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person w...

      With increased economic scale and transactions, negative social phenomenon may be appeared such as concealment of dealing by registration under disguised ownership hiding one’s name. The concept of the ‘Specially Related Person’ or the 'person with special interest' can be useful solution for the problems. There are various types of provisions on the concept in many Korean laws.
      The Korean Competition Law (Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act) also uses this concept in many provisions. For example, Article 7 of the act provides that no one shall, directly or through the person with special interest, practically suppress competition by conducting several practices. Article 23 prescribes that no enterpriser shall commit the unfair trade practices. Sub paragraph 7 of the article provides that an act “assisting a person with a special interest or other companies by providing advanced payment, loans, manpower, immovable assets, stocks and bonds, or intellectual properties there to, or by transacting under substantially favourable terms therewith” is one of the unfair trade practices.
      Although the provisions may be useful to regulate several issues of certain field of competition law such as unfair trade practices and combination of enterprises, they have some problems and have been criticised in several legal points of view. Many issues can be analysed or examined. For example, the ‘Specially Related Person’ who is relative is on the centre of the issues.
      This study is aimed to figure out the problems and device improvement of the provisions concerning the ‘Specially Related Person’ in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김은경, "회사법상 특수관계인 규정에 관한 비교법적 고찰 -영미 회사법 규정과의 비교를 중심으로-" 법학연구원 33 (33): 185-210, 2009

      2 전경련, "특수관계인 관련 법령의 실태와 개선과제. in: 규제개혁시리즈 3" 전경련 2008

      3 오수근, "특수관계인 관련 규정의 위헌소지 및 법리적 타당성 검토 - 특수관계인 규제 공정한가" 한국경제연구원 2004

      4 이인권, "특수관계인 관련 규정의 위헌성 검토 및 대안 모색" 한국경제연구원 5 : 2006

      5 김봉철, "자본시장법의 ‘특수관계인’ 관련 규정에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국경영법률학회 20 (20): 389-419, 2010

      6 이철송, "상법총론·상행위, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      7 전경련, "상법의 일부규정의 시행에 관한 규정 일부개정령안 검토의견, 정책건의서, 2009. 1. 16"

      8 김동훈, "상법개설" 한국외국어대학교출판부 2009

      9 매일경제신문, "매일경제신문, 2009. 3. 25"

      10 홍명수, "독점규제법상 특수관계인과의 기업결합에 대한 규제 가능성 검토" 한국경쟁법학회 19 : 27-44, 2009

      1 김은경, "회사법상 특수관계인 규정에 관한 비교법적 고찰 -영미 회사법 규정과의 비교를 중심으로-" 법학연구원 33 (33): 185-210, 2009

      2 전경련, "특수관계인 관련 법령의 실태와 개선과제. in: 규제개혁시리즈 3" 전경련 2008

      3 오수근, "특수관계인 관련 규정의 위헌소지 및 법리적 타당성 검토 - 특수관계인 규제 공정한가" 한국경제연구원 2004

      4 이인권, "특수관계인 관련 규정의 위헌성 검토 및 대안 모색" 한국경제연구원 5 : 2006

      5 김봉철, "자본시장법의 ‘특수관계인’ 관련 규정에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국경영법률학회 20 (20): 389-419, 2010

      6 이철송, "상법총론·상행위, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      7 전경련, "상법의 일부규정의 시행에 관한 규정 일부개정령안 검토의견, 정책건의서, 2009. 1. 16"

      8 김동훈, "상법개설" 한국외국어대학교출판부 2009

      9 매일경제신문, "매일경제신문, 2009. 3. 25"

      10 홍명수, "독점규제법상 특수관계인과의 기업결합에 대한 규제 가능성 검토" 한국경쟁법학회 19 : 27-44, 2009

      11 김은경, "규제합리화를 위한 특수관계인 법령 정비방안" 법무부 2009

      12 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회, 보도자료, 2009. 3. 24"

      13 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회, 보도자료, 2007. 12. 28"

      14 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회, 보도자료, 2001. 8. 8"

      15 이호영, "공정거래법상 특수관계인에 대한 부당지원행위의 규제" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) 12 : 381-402, 2004

      16 정준우, "경제법령상 특수관계자규정의 타당성 검토" 대한변호사협회 1999

      17 전경련, "경제법령상 특수관계인 규제실태와 개선과제" 2004

      18 양명조, "경제법강의, 제7판" 신조사 2009

      19 이기수, "경제법, 제8판" 세창출판사 2009

      20 정호열, "경제법" 박영사 2010

      21 권오승, "경제법" 법문사 2010

      22 김봉철, "경제/기업법령상 친족인 ‘특수관계인’ 관련 규정의 문제점과 개선방향" 법학연구소 33 (33): 231-269, 2009

      23 김완석, "稅法上 特殊關係人의 問題點과 改善方案" 중앙법학회 7 (7): 101-137, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-11 학술지등록 한글명 : 법제연구
      외국어명 : JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION RESEARCH
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.43 0.692 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼