RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    러시아의 동북아 에너지외교와 한국 = Russia's Energy Diplomacy Toward Northeast Asia and Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104120652

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article has a purpose to analyze the characteristics of Russia's diplomacy toward Korea, Japan, and China, as main states of Northeast Asia. Russia's energy diplomacy toward Northeast Asia is recognized as a ardent issue, while the scope of Russia's diplomacy has been broadened to East Asia from the traditional region in her concerning, the Europe. Russia's Energy strategy and the export system to Northeast Asian states is connected deeply each other. Russia thinks strategically energy resources. Japan and China have been also considered energy resources as a strategic one as well as Russia, and it is evident that they have been established long term plan for energy supply. Energy strategy of Japan and China is mixed in the structure of geo-political axis, confrontation, competition, and concert in international relation. Russia wants to manage her leadership in negotiation with the other state through bilateral contact on energy cooperation and Russia also intends to participate directly in the management of mega project. Japan and China willing to aside from advantage of their country in the fields of import quarter and pipe line connection. Contrary to, Russia has to maximize her interests, using the nature of competition between Japan and China. Japan-China rivals is originated from supply system and that cooperation between Japan and China is difficult to make for it's competitive nature. Korea has to set her desirable role as a arbitrator among the major states, Russia, China, and Japan in Northeast Asia rather than making the states' cooperation frame. Russia as a single export state in energy sector in Northeast Asia has a vivid goal for achieving leadership with bilateralism in energy cooperation. If only Korea will try to negotiate through multilateralism, Korea should be surrounded by alienated atmosphere in Northeast Asia. It could be recognized rightly that Korean government has been tried for securing the multi energy market from abroad in 2000s. Nevertheless, Korea has to participate in the development of East Siberia as a common goods in global level, and has to consider positively the development of West Siberia which possesses abundant potential quantity in energy resources beyond the East Siberia and the construction of pipeline. For multifying and sharing the danger of investment, legally stable institutions are needed, transparency on burying quantity is guaranteed, technical difficulty is avoided, and the politicalization of energy business is has to evaded. And it is need to founding international consortium which is managed by foreign companies, the danger of energy projection has to evaded as a outcome of this, and international cooperation and common policies on this field has to be eschewed. At the same time, Korean government should strive to obtain the utmost cooperation of Russia in the various bilateral energy projects which are reciprocally beneficial to Russia and Korea. At last, the increasing of Korea's sharing the interests in energy export market in Northeast Asia is connected to trying to the possibilities and methods of excising energy development beyond potentiality. It is need to suggest that this point can provoke to establish action plan and long term blue print with the strategic thinking on energy resources.
    번역하기

    This article has a purpose to analyze the characteristics of Russia's diplomacy toward Korea, Japan, and China, as main states of Northeast Asia. Russia's energy diplomacy toward Northeast Asia is recognized as a ardent issue, while the scope of Russi...

    This article has a purpose to analyze the characteristics of Russia's diplomacy toward Korea, Japan, and China, as main states of Northeast Asia. Russia's energy diplomacy toward Northeast Asia is recognized as a ardent issue, while the scope of Russia's diplomacy has been broadened to East Asia from the traditional region in her concerning, the Europe. Russia's Energy strategy and the export system to Northeast Asian states is connected deeply each other. Russia thinks strategically energy resources. Japan and China have been also considered energy resources as a strategic one as well as Russia, and it is evident that they have been established long term plan for energy supply. Energy strategy of Japan and China is mixed in the structure of geo-political axis, confrontation, competition, and concert in international relation. Russia wants to manage her leadership in negotiation with the other state through bilateral contact on energy cooperation and Russia also intends to participate directly in the management of mega project. Japan and China willing to aside from advantage of their country in the fields of import quarter and pipe line connection. Contrary to, Russia has to maximize her interests, using the nature of competition between Japan and China. Japan-China rivals is originated from supply system and that cooperation between Japan and China is difficult to make for it's competitive nature. Korea has to set her desirable role as a arbitrator among the major states, Russia, China, and Japan in Northeast Asia rather than making the states' cooperation frame. Russia as a single export state in energy sector in Northeast Asia has a vivid goal for achieving leadership with bilateralism in energy cooperation. If only Korea will try to negotiate through multilateralism, Korea should be surrounded by alienated atmosphere in Northeast Asia. It could be recognized rightly that Korean government has been tried for securing the multi energy market from abroad in 2000s. Nevertheless, Korea has to participate in the development of East Siberia as a common goods in global level, and has to consider positively the development of West Siberia which possesses abundant potential quantity in energy resources beyond the East Siberia and the construction of pipeline. For multifying and sharing the danger of investment, legally stable institutions are needed, transparency on burying quantity is guaranteed, technical difficulty is avoided, and the politicalization of energy business is has to evaded. And it is need to founding international consortium which is managed by foreign companies, the danger of energy projection has to evaded as a outcome of this, and international cooperation and common policies on this field has to be eschewed. At the same time, Korean government should strive to obtain the utmost cooperation of Russia in the various bilateral energy projects which are reciprocally beneficial to Russia and Korea. At last, the increasing of Korea's sharing the interests in energy export market in Northeast Asia is connected to trying to the possibilities and methods of excising energy development beyond potentiality. It is need to suggest that this point can provoke to establish action plan and long term blue print with the strategic thinking on energy resources.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박병구, "한중일 석유전쟁" 한스미디어 2008

    2 장지호, "한국 에너지 정책의 변화: 수급구조의 변화와 에너지 안보. in: 협력과 갈등의 동북아 에너지 안보" 인간사랑 2008

    3 KIEP, "한·러 가스공급 양해각서 체결의 의미와 과제" 2008

    4 우평균, "푸틴시대 러시아정치외교와 극동개발" 한국학술정보 2008

    5 이태환, "중국의 글로벌 에너지자원 외교" 세종연구소 12-15, 2008

    6 "조선일보(2006), 7월 1일"

    7 폴라트, 에리히, "자원전쟁" 영림 카디널 2008

    8 김성철, "일본의 자원에너지 외교전략" 세종연구소 16-19, 2008

    9 일본유라시아연구소, "부활하는 러시아의 자원외교" 전략과문화 2008

    10 김영진, "러시아의 에너지 정책과 그 과제" 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터 4 : 60-65, 2008

    1 박병구, "한중일 석유전쟁" 한스미디어 2008

    2 장지호, "한국 에너지 정책의 변화: 수급구조의 변화와 에너지 안보. in: 협력과 갈등의 동북아 에너지 안보" 인간사랑 2008

    3 KIEP, "한·러 가스공급 양해각서 체결의 의미와 과제" 2008

    4 우평균, "푸틴시대 러시아정치외교와 극동개발" 한국학술정보 2008

    5 이태환, "중국의 글로벌 에너지자원 외교" 세종연구소 12-15, 2008

    6 "조선일보(2006), 7월 1일"

    7 폴라트, 에리히, "자원전쟁" 영림 카디널 2008

    8 김성철, "일본의 자원에너지 외교전략" 세종연구소 16-19, 2008

    9 일본유라시아연구소, "부활하는 러시아의 자원외교" 전략과문화 2008

    10 김영진, "러시아의 에너지 정책과 그 과제" 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터 4 : 60-65, 2008

    11 고재남, "러시아의 에너지 외교: 현황과 전망" 외교안보연구원 2006

    12 이유신, "러시아와 OPEC의 협력관계: 국제유가 하락시를 중심으로" 세종연구소 10 (10): 61-93, 2004

    13 이유신, "러시아와 OPEC의 협력관계: 국제유가 하락시를 중심으로" 세종연구소 10 (10): 61-93, 2004

    14 윤성학, "러시아 에너지가 대한민국을 바꾼다" 뿌쉬낀하우스 2008

    15 이재영, "러시아 에너지 산업의 미래와 협력 방안. in: 러시아의 미래와 한반도" 한국학술정보 2009

    16 김석환, "러시아 메드베제프 대통령 체제의 신국가 발전 전략과 한·러 협력" KIET 2008

    17 정은숙, "러-일 에너지협력과 정책시사점" 세종연구소 139 : 1-2, 2009

    18 이준범, "동북아시아에서의 석유산업의 환경 변화 고찰" 한국동북아학회 9 (9): 3-26, 2004

    19 이준범, "동북아시아에서의 석유산업의 환경 변화 고찰" 한국동북아학회 9 (9): 3-26, 2004

    20 조현, "동북아 에너지 협력의 현황과 전망" 제주평화연구원 1-11, 2009

    21 이영형, "동북아 에너지 협력구상과 한국의 에너지 안보: 러시아 극동/시베리아의 에너지 자원을 중심으로" 국제문제조사연구소 5 (5): 107-153, 2005

    22 이태환, "동북아 에너지 안보와 협력" 세종연구소 4 (4): 211-240, 2008

    23 안충영, "동북아 경제협력:통합의 첫 걸음" 박영사 2003

    24 "人民日報(2004), 5월 5일"

    25 "Правительство РФ, Энергетическая России на период до 2030 (Проект) (Москва: Изд. Энергия, 2007)"

    26 "Министерство промышленности и торговли РФ, Энергетическая России на период до 2020 года (Москва, 2003)"

    27 Путин, В., "В ступителиное слово на заседанныйСовета везапасность по вопросы о лоли России в обшепеченный мезднароднои енергецическойвезапасность"

    28 Polat, Erich, "Ttranslated,Energy War" Youngrim Cardinal 2008

    29 Hyune, S.S., "Translated, Reviving Russia's Energy Diplomacy" Strategy and Culture 2008

    30 Lee, Y.H., "Thinking about Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia and Korea's Energy Security: Stressing on the Energy Resources in Russian Far East and Siberia" Research Institute of International Issues 5 (5): 107-153, 2005

    31 Hanson, Philip, "The sustainablity of Russia's Energy Power: Implications for the Russian Economy. in: Russian Energy Power and Foreign Relations: Implications for Conflict and Cooperation" Rotledge 24-50, 2009

    32 Paik, Hoon, "The Regional Energy Cooperation Regimes and the Case of North East Asian Energy Cooperation. in: Energy Security and Energy Cooperation Regime in East Asia" KAIS 25-, 2006

    33 Lane, David, "The Political Economy of Russian Oil" Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield 1999

    34 Stern, Jonathan, "The Future of Russian Gas and Gazprom" Oxford University Press 2005

    35 Lee, J.Y., "The Future and Devices for Cooperation in Russian Energy Industry. in: Russia's Future and Korean Peninsula" Korean Academic Information 2009

    36 Jo, H., "Situation and Prospect of Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia" Jeju Peace Institute 1-11, 2009

    37 Woo, P.K., "Russian Politics and Diplomacy in the Time of Putin and Development of Russian Far East" Korean Academic Information 2008

    38 Grace, John D., "Russian Oil Supply: Prefermance and Prospects" Oxford University Press 2005

    39 Baev, Pavel K., "Russian Energy Policy and Military Power: Putin's Quest for Greatness" Routledge 2008

    40 Yoon, S.H., "Russian Energy Changing Korea" Pushikin House 2008

    41 Ellman, Michael, "Russia's Oil and Gas: Bonanza or Curse?" Anthem Press 2006

    42 Poussenkova, Nina, "Russia's Future Customers: Asia and Beyond. in: Russian Energy Power and Foreign Relations" Routledge 2009

    43 Kim, Y.J., "Russia's Energy Policy and It's Implication" Research Center of Asia Pacific Region, Hanyang University 4 : 60-65, 2008

    44 Ko, J.M., "Russia's Energy Diplomacy: Current Issue and Prospect" IFANS 2006

    45 "Runmin Ibo(2004), May 5"

    46 Goldman, Marshall, "Petrostate: Putin, Power and the New Russia" Oxford University Press 2008

    47 Park, B.K., "Oil War between Korea, China, and Japan" Hans Media 2008

    48 Kim, S.H., "Neo Development Strategy in Russian President Medvegev's Regime and Korea-Russia Cooperation" KIET 2008

    49 KIEP, "Meanings and Obligations of MOU on Gas Supply between Korea and Russia" 2008

    50 Kim, S.C., "Japan's Diplomatic Strategy for Energy" The Sejong Institute 16-19, 2008

    51 Sokolov, Dmitry, "Energy Security and International Relations in East Asia" Yonsei University and Institute of East Asian Regional Studies, AEAS, Sungkyunkwan University 2008

    52 Lee, Tae Hwan, "Energy Security and Cooperation in Northeast Asia" The Sejong Institute 4 (4): 212-240, 2008

    53 Jeong, E.S., "Energy Cooperation between Russia and Japan and It's Implication" Sejong Institute 139 : 1-2, 2009

    54 An, C.Y., "Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia: First Step for Integration" Parkyoungsa Publishing Co. 2003

    55 Gustafson, Thane, "Crisis Amid Plenty: The Politics of Soviet Energy Under Brezhnev and Gorbachev" Princeton University Press 1989

    56 "Chosun Ibo(2006), July 1"

    57 Overland, Indra, "Chinese Perspectives on Russian Oil and Gas. in: Russian Energy Power and Foreign Relations" Routledge 2009

    58 Lee, T.H., "China's Global Diplomacy for Energy Resources" The Sejong Institute 12-15, 2008

    59 Jang, J.H., "Change of Korean Energy Policies: Change of Supply Structure and Energy Security. in: Cooperation and Conflicts of Energy Security in Northeast Asia" Ingansarang 2008

    60 "CNPC are Satisfied With Starting of ESPO Pipeline Construction from Skovorodino"

    61 Chunrong, Tian, "Analysis of China's Oil Import and Export in 2006" 3 : 3-20, 2007

    62 ""Выгодное товарищество," Ведомости(2007), August 1"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼