RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to review research studies targeting for infants and toddlers at risk and with disabilities from 2016 to 2020 and compare the findings with those of previous research synthesis(Cho, et al., 2016; Kim, 2014). [Method] Using search engine and websites of related journals, a total of 114 studies was found as appropriately met the purpose of this study and the inclusion criteria. [Results] First, the outcome of this study presented that the analyzed studies were published at similar rates of each year from 2016 to 2020. As the result of researcher trend, 48.2% of the studies was found to be two authors involved and 21.9% of them was to be single author involved. Second, 48.2% of the studies have adults’ participation and 28.9% of them have infants and toddlers.’ And the most popular research topics were ‘Development and behaviors(22.8%)’ and ‘Early intervention and related services(21.9%).’ And the analyzed studies used survey research(24.6%) and research synthesis(21.1%) in the highest rate. Third, independent and dependent variables of Experimental studies(12) and single subject studies(8) were analyzed as follows. The most popular IV was parents education program and DV was interaction and parenting efficacy for experimental studies. For SSD studies, each of IV was different and the most popular DV was social interaction. Forth, the findings of this study compared with them of previous research synthesis(Cho, et al., 2016; Kim, 2014). The previous research synthesis have mostly infants and toddlers as the participants, which was different findings of this study. These two studies have ‘Development and behaviors’ as the most popular research topics, which was the same finding of this study. These two studies also have similar trends in that they used survey research following diagnostic research as research methods. [Conclusion] This study and two previous research synthesis have different inclusion criteria and framework of analysis and thus it would be meaningful if future research synthesis compare with previous ones with the same inclusion criteria and framework of analysis.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조윤경, "현장 전문가 소집단 면담을 통한 발달지체 영아 조기개입 주요 요소의 실행 가능성에 대한 탐색" 한국유아특수교육학회 17 (17): 115-145, 2017

2 백유순, "특수학교 및 특수교육지원센터 관리자들이 인식하는 장애영아 지원 실태 및 요구" 한국유아특수교육학회 14 (14): 97-131, 2014

3 김성애, "특수교육지원센터에서의 장애영아 교육지원 실태 및 요구" 한국지적장애교육학회 13 (13): 123-158, 2011

4 한연주, "지역사회 중심의 장애 영유아 조기발견 및 조기개입 통합모형 구축-수원시를 중심으로-" 한국자폐학회 18 (18): 29-59, 2018

5 표윤희, "장애학생에 대한 교사와 치료사 간 협력적 팀 접근 중재의 질적 평가 지표에 따른 연구 동향 분석" 한국지체.중복.건강장애교육학회 57 (57): 293-320, 2014

6 김태영, "장애위험 및 장애영아 대상 국내연구 동향에 대한 분석" 한국유아특수교육학회 14 (14): 75-98, 2014

7 정혜윤, "장애 조기발견 및 지원 시스템 개발을 위한 기초 연구 -부산광역시를 중심으로-" 한국장애인복지학회 (27) : 73-98, 2015

8 김미영, "장애 위험 및 장애 영아 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석" 한국유아특수교육학회 20 (20): 249-279, 2020

9 김진호, "장애 영유아 부모관련 국내 실험연구 고찰" 한국유아특수교육학회 17 (17): 45-66, 2017

10 김진호, "장애 영유아 담당교사를 대상으로 한 국내 연구동향 분석 및 연구방법 고찰" 특수교육연구소 16 (16): 187-211, 2017