RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Feasibility of transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer = results of a pilot study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102128322

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer.
      Methods: This study enrolled 12 patients with clinically node negative rectal cancer located 4–12 cm from the anal verge who underwent transanal endoscopic TME with the assistance of single port laparoscopic surgery between September 2013 and August 2014. The primary endpoint was TME quality; secondary endpoints included number of harvested lymph nodes and postoperative complications within 30 days (NCT01938027).
      Results: The 12 patients included 7 males and 5 females, of median age 59 years and median body mass index 24.2 kg/㎡. Tumors were located on average 6.7 cm from the anal verge. Four patients (33.3%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Median operating time was 195 minutes and median blood loss was 50 mL. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. TME was complete or nearly complete in 11 patients (91.7%). Median distal resection and circumferential resection margins were 18.5 mm and 10 mm, respectively. Median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15. Median length of hospital stay was 9 days. There were no postoperative deaths. Six patients experienced minor postoperative complications, including urinary dysfunction in 2, transient ileus in 3, and wound abscess in 1.
      Conclusion: This pilot study showed that high-quality TME was possible in most patients without serious complications. Transanal TME for patients with rectal cancer may be feasible and safe, but further investigations are necessary to evaluate its long-term functional and oncologic outcomes and to clarify its indications.
      번역하기

      Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: This study enrolled 12 patients with clinically node negative rectal cancer located 4–12 cm from the anal verge who underwe...

      Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer.
      Methods: This study enrolled 12 patients with clinically node negative rectal cancer located 4–12 cm from the anal verge who underwent transanal endoscopic TME with the assistance of single port laparoscopic surgery between September 2013 and August 2014. The primary endpoint was TME quality; secondary endpoints included number of harvested lymph nodes and postoperative complications within 30 days (NCT01938027).
      Results: The 12 patients included 7 males and 5 females, of median age 59 years and median body mass index 24.2 kg/㎡. Tumors were located on average 6.7 cm from the anal verge. Four patients (33.3%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Median operating time was 195 minutes and median blood loss was 50 mL. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. TME was complete or nearly complete in 11 patients (91.7%). Median distal resection and circumferential resection margins were 18.5 mm and 10 mm, respectively. Median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15. Median length of hospital stay was 9 days. There were no postoperative deaths. Six patients experienced minor postoperative complications, including urinary dysfunction in 2, transient ileus in 3, and wound abscess in 1.
      Conclusion: This pilot study showed that high-quality TME was possible in most patients without serious complications. Transanal TME for patients with rectal cancer may be feasible and safe, but further investigations are necessary to evaluate its long-term functional and oncologic outcomes and to clarify its indications.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • INTRODUCTION
      • METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • REFERENCES
      • INTRODUCTION
      • METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Velthuis S., "Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma" 28 : 3494-3499, 2014

      2 Fernandez-Hevia M., "Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer : short-term outcomes in com parison with laparoscopic surgery" 261 : 221-227, 2015

      3 Telem DA., "Transanal recto sigmoid resection via natural orifice translu menal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series" 27 : 74-80, 2013

      4 de Lacy AM., "Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)rectal resection : "down-to-up"total mesorectal excision(TME) : short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases" 27 : 316572-, 2013

      5 Atallah S., "Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision(TAMISTME) : results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curativeintent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution" 18 : 47380-, 2014

      6 Knol JJ., "Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision : technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below : a preliminary report" 19 : 221-229, 2015

      7 Rouanet P., "Transanal endoscopic proctectomy : an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis" 56 : 408-415, 2013

      8 Emhoff IA., "Transanal colo rec tal resection using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)" 26 (26): 2942-, 2014

      9 Park YM., "The effec tiveness and safety of endoscopic sub mucosal dissection compared with endo scopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer : a systematic review and meta analysis" 25 : 266677-, 2011

      10 Glynne-Jones R., "The clinical significance of the circumferen tial resection margin following pre operative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer : why we need a common lan guage" 8 : 800-807, 2006

      1 Velthuis S., "Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma" 28 : 3494-3499, 2014

      2 Fernandez-Hevia M., "Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer : short-term outcomes in com parison with laparoscopic surgery" 261 : 221-227, 2015

      3 Telem DA., "Transanal recto sigmoid resection via natural orifice translu menal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series" 27 : 74-80, 2013

      4 de Lacy AM., "Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)rectal resection : "down-to-up"total mesorectal excision(TME) : short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases" 27 : 316572-, 2013

      5 Atallah S., "Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision(TAMISTME) : results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curativeintent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution" 18 : 47380-, 2014

      6 Knol JJ., "Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision : technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below : a preliminary report" 19 : 221-229, 2015

      7 Rouanet P., "Transanal endoscopic proctectomy : an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis" 56 : 408-415, 2013

      8 Emhoff IA., "Transanal colo rec tal resection using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)" 26 (26): 2942-, 2014

      9 Park YM., "The effec tiveness and safety of endoscopic sub mucosal dissection compared with endo scopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer : a systematic review and meta analysis" 25 : 266677-, 2011

      10 Glynne-Jones R., "The clinical significance of the circumferen tial resection margin following pre operative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer : why we need a common lan guage" 8 : 800-807, 2006

      11 Sylla P., "Survival study of natural orifice translumenal endo scopic surgery for rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery with or without transgastric endoscopic assis tance in a swine model" 24 : 2022-2030, 2010

      12 Marks J., "Sphincter-sparing surgery for adenocar cinoma of the distal 3 cm of the true rec tum : results after neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive radical surgery or local excision" 27 : 446977-, 2013

      13 Leroy J., "Single port sigmoidectomy in an experimental model with survival" 15 : 260-265, 2008

      14 Guillou PJ., "Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer(MRC CLASICC trial) : multicentre, randomised controlled trial" 365 : 1718-1726, 2005

      15 Jeong SY., "Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(COREAN trial) : survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial" 15 : 76774-, 2014

      16 Sylla P., "NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance" 24 : 1205-1210, 2010

      17 Quirke P., "Local recurrence of rectal adeno carcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision" 2 : 996-999, 1986

      18 van der Pas MH., "Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer(COLOR II) : short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial" 14 : 210-218, 2013

      19 Whiteford MH., "Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)using transanal endoscopic microsurgery" 21 : 1870-1874, 2007

      20 Jorge JM., "Etiology and manage ment of fecal incontinence" 36 : 77-97, 1993

      21 Martling AL., "Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project" 356 : 93-96, 2000

      22 Sohn DK., "Comparative study of NOTES rectosigmoidectomy in a swine model: E-NOTES vs. P-NOTES" 43 : 526-532, 2011

      23 Nagtegaal ID., "Circum ferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma : not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit" 26 : 350-357, 2002

      24 Tuech JJ., "A step toward NOTES total meso rectal exci sion for rectal cancer : endo scopic transanal proctectomy" 261 : 228-233, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-11-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한외과학회지 -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-12-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Surgical Society -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.39 0.21 0.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.56 0.328 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼