1960~70년대 산업재해보상보험제도의 시행과 산재(産災)노동자의 대응 = Execution of Industrial accidents Compensation system and response of Industrial accident workers in the 1960s to 1970s

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Generally Industrial accidents compensation system is thought to be typical Industrial accidents compensation system. However, when Industrial accidents compensation system was introduced in Korea, society didn`t accept the system easily. It was due to the social mood that anti-poverty and unemployment is more critical issue than social security system. Some of the workers didn`t welcome for fear that the amount of heir Industrial accidents compensation, which gained from collective agreement, will decrease. Unwelcomed Industrial accidents compensation system raised various complaints from workers as the companies adapting the system expanded. the Minister of Office of Labor Affairs added a regulation in Industrial accidents compensation system limiting the payment of insurance in case when the fault lied in owner of the company or disabled worker. It meant the system accused the responsibility of Industrial accident to the disabled worker, which became a critical reason to make workers unsatisfied with the Industrial accidents compensation system. ``Merit rate`` of the industrial accident compensation insurance conducted in the same reason covered up the accident rather than to improve the effects of the industrial accident prevention results. Workers, the direct victim of the accident were not satisfied with the industrial accident compensation insurance itself. Workers saying the accident insurance to be operated "severely" due to ``Insurance Application restrictions` raised the institutional problem of the insurance. Korea Confederation of Trade Unions insisted that the system be improved receiving the complaints of victims of an industrial accident. Individual accident workers asked the responsibility of the Company for the industrial accident occurrence and filed a civil lawsuit. This was a result of the spread that awareness to corporate rights liability is caused by industrial accident. But workers` compensation claims and civil action was only a post-compensation to request for legal action. This situation was began to change after a ``Min, Jeongjin incidents of Hyeopsin Leather Industry`` in 1977. The family of Min, Jeongjin and workers insisted that the work order issued to workers in the workplace where an industrial accident is taken place inevitably be equal to ``Worker Murder``. They demanded the Minister of Office of Labor Affairs to step down and Hyeopsin Leather Industry President Moon Jaein be placed under arrest because they were responsible for the incident. It was "the moment of the Change" that demands of the workers to stay in the post-compensation level was progressed to "The level" to require the Government and corporate to answer for not preventing the accident itself.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국경영자협의회, 1983

2 우명숙, "한국의 복지제도 발전에서 산재보험 도입의 의의:복지제도 형성과 발전주의적 국가개입" 한국사회학회 41 (41): 154-185, 2007

3 최장집, "한국의 노동운동과 국가" 나남출판 1997

4 정무권, "한국 사회복지제도의 초기 형성에 관한 연구" 3 : 1996

5 노동청, "산업재해분석" 1978

6 대한산업보건협회, "산업보건 반세기 : 현장의 기록, 대한산업보건협회 50년사 1963-2013" 2013

7 노동청, "산업과 노동(이후 노동)" 1979

8 한국노동조합총연맹, "사업보고 1964~1979" 1979

9 김원, "박정희 시대의 유령들" 현실문화 2011

10 "매일경제"

11 "동아일보"

12 노동청, "노동행정10년사" 1973

13 "국가법령정보센터"

14 "경향신문"

15 邢光錫, "韓國의 産業災害에 關한 연구" 전남대 1992

16 勞動部勞動保險局, "産災保險 十五年史" 1981

17 金晋局, "産業災害補償制度의 硏究: 業務上 災害槪念을 中心으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1987

18 노동청, "産業災害補償保險審査委員會 재결집" 1968

19 황병주, "1970년대 의료보험 정책의 변화와 복지담론" 대한의사학회 20 (20): 425-462, 2011

20 한국기독교교회협의회한국교회산업선교25주년기념대회, "1970년대 노동현장과 증언" 풀빛 1984

21 이홍석, "1960년대 전반 탄광촌의 현실과 탄광노동자의 대응" 연세대 2008

22 김영수, "1960-70년대 한국 노동자의 계급문화와 정체성" 한울 2006

23 황병주, "1950~1960년대 테일러리즘과 ‘대중관리’" 국제한국문학문화학회 (14) : 9-49, 2013