RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The cognitive neuroscience of vision

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=M7869659

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        Malden, Mass. : Blackwell Publishers, 2000

      • 발행연도

        2000

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • DDC

        612.84 판사항(22)

      • ISBN

        063121402X (hbk : alk. paper)
        0631214038 (pbk. : alk. paper)

      • 자료형태

        단행본(다권본)

      • 발행국(도시)

        Massachusetts

      • 서명/저자사항

        The cognitive neuroscience of vision / Martha J. Farah.

      • 형태사항

        xix, 380 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.

      • 총서사항

        Fundamentals of cognitive neuroscience ; 3

      • 일반주기명

        Includes bibliographical references (p. [336]-366) and indexes.

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 남서울대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울대학교 수의학도서관 소장기관정보 Deep Link
        • 연세대학교 학술문화처 도서관 소장기관정보 Deep Link
        • 영남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보 Deep Link
        • 용인대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 홍익대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • CONTENTS
      • List of Illustrations = ⅷ
      • Series Editors' Preface = xvi
      • Preface = xviii
      • Acknowledgments = xx
      • CONTENTS
      • List of Illustrations = ⅷ
      • Series Editors' Preface = xvi
      • Preface = xviii
      • Acknowledgments = xx
      • 1 Early Vision = 1
      • 2 From Local to Global Image Representation = 29
      • 3 The Problem of Visual Recognition = 65
      • 4 Object Recognition = 82
      • 5 Face Recognition = 115
      • 6 Word Recognition = 147
      • 7 Visual Attention = 174
      • 8 Hemispatial Neglect = 206
      • 9 Mental Imagery = 252
      • 10 Visual Awareness = 290
      • References = 336
      • Index = 367
      • Illustrations
      • 1.1 Cross-section through the retina, showing three functionally distinct layers of cells : receptor cells, collector cells, and ganglion cells = 2
      • 1.2 Absorption spectra of the three types of cones = 4
      • 1.3 Schematic depiction of on-center/off-surround(left) and off-center/on-surround(right) receptive field structures = 5
      • 1.4 Schematic depiction of the complementarity of M and P channels for spatial and temporal information = 7
      • 1.5 Section through the LGN of one hemisphere showing its two magnocellular layers(with their visibly larger cell bodies) on the bottom and four parvocellular layers on top = 9
      • 1.6 Correspondences between location of lesion within thevisual system and pattern of visual field defects. = 13
      • 1.7 Pattern of metabolically active cells in the primary visual cortex of one hemisphere in a monkey who fixated the radial pattern shown above, demonstrating both retinotopy and cortical manification of the fovea = 15
      • 1.8 Bar stimuli of different orientations(left) and the responses they evoke from a simple cell in primary visual cortex(right) = 16
      • 1.9 Illustration of the idea that simple cells result form the feedforward convergence of a set of center-surround cells = 18
      • 1.10 The orderly progression of orientation preference as a function of electrode position during and obliquepenetration of primary visual cortex = 21
      • 1.11 Idealized depiction of the organization of orientation selectivity and ocular dominance in primary visual cortex = 22
      • 1.12 Reconstruction of the actual relations between orientation columns(black) in primary visual cortex = 22
      • 1.13 Layers of primary visual cortex, with distribution of cell types and afferent and efferent connections shown. = 24
      • 1.14 Ocular dominance columns(left) and cytochrome oxidase blobs(middle) and their relation to one another(right) = 25
      • 1.15 Original version of Livingstone and Hubel's hypothesis. = 27
      • 2.1 Still life painted by an artist with acquired cerebral achromatiopsia, intended to convey his visual experience to others = 35
      • 2.2 Location of V4 in the monkey brain. = 38
      • 2.3 Location of the 'color center' of the human brain, identified by ERPs recorded from the cortical surface(grid) nd two PET studies(labeled C and L) = 39
      • 2.4 Location of MT in the monkey brain = 42
      • 2.5 The aperture problem : With just this local view of the moving line, we cannot tell if it is moving at one speed in a direction perpendicular to itself, or at a faster speed in a direction more aligned with itself = 43
      • 2.6 Example of stimuli used in experiments distinguishing component and pattern motion perception. The plaid pattern on the right is perceived by us, and responded to by our pattern-selective neurons, as moving to the right, but component-selective neuro = 44
      • 2.7 Example of stimuli used in experiments measuring direction discrimination. The smaller the proportion of coherently moving dots, the harder the discrimination = 46
      • 2.8 Reconstruction of presumed critical lesion for producing motion blindness in a human = 49
      • 2.9 Relative sizes of receptive fields for neurons in different parts of the visua system = 52
      • 2.10 An example of illusory contours form in a ghostly triangle = 52
      • 2.11 A single line passing throught two cells' receptive fields(top) results in more synchrony between the cells activity than a broken line(middle), which in turn produces more synchrony than two separately moving line segments(bottom), demonstrating = 54
      • 2.12 Shape matching task = 57
      • 2.13 An apperceptive agnosic read this pattern as 7415, demonstrating his extremely local perception of form = 59
      • 2.14 Examples of stimuli designed to tax visual recognition and spatial learning in a study of unilateral right-hemishphere damaged patients = 62
      • 2.15(a) Typical pair of patterns to be discriminated, impaired after inferotemporal lesions in monkeys.(bO Typical arrangement of a spatial landmark and food wells in a spatial learning experiment, impaired after posterior parietal lesions in monkeys = 63
      • 3.1 Two views of a novel object used in experiments demonstrating viewpoint dependence in object recognition = 66
      • 3.2 Example of a hybrid representation that is object-centered for size, position, and picture-plane orientation, and viewer-centered for depth orientation, with relations among different views encoded as a graph = 74
      • 3.3 "Codons, " a type of contour-based primitiv proposed by Hoffman and Richards = 75
      • 3.4 The "2½D sketch" of Marr, which uses surfacebased primitives = 76
      • 3.5 Examples of three well-known sets of volume-based primitives = 77
      • 3.6 A hierarchically organized representation of the Human body = 78
      • 4.1 Sidney Harris's classic cartoon, which about sums up our understanding of the neural information processing performed between V4 and IT = 83
      • 4.2 Inferotemporal cortex in the monkey brain = 84
      • 4.3 Performance of IT-lesioned monkeys in a visual discrimination task = 86
      • 4.4 The range of stimuli used to test the selectivity of a "hand cell'" in monkey IT cortex. the more different the stimulus shape from a monkey hand, the smaller the cell's response = 89
      • 4.5 of stimulus patterns for which cells in IT cortex show selectivity = 90
      • 4.6 the response strength of a shape selective cell as a function of shape similarity and as a function of stimulus size = 91
      • 4.7 Copies of pictures made by an asociative visual agnosic who could not recognize the pictures, either before of after copying them = 95
      • 4.8 More examples of the good-quality copies made by associative visual agnosics who do not recognize their subject matter = 96
      • 4.9 Examples of photographs used to test for a perceptual categorization deficit = 100
      • 4.10 Activation maxima from 17 neuroimaging studies of visual recognition = 104
      • 4.11 Maxima subdivided into those derived from subtractions between passive object viewing and passive baseline tasks, and those derived from subtractions between active object recognition tasks and corresponding active baseline tasks = 105
      • 4.12 Maxima subdivided into those derived from visual recognition of objects, faces, and printed words = 106
      • 5.1 We are so proficient at face rocognition that it may be hard to appreciate shat radically different images fall on our retinas when a single face changes its expresion or orientation = 116
      • 5.2 Some well-known faces = 118
      • 5.3 Responses ofa typical face cell to a variety of stumuli = 120
      • 5.4 Examples of stumuli from an experiment contrasting face and object recoignition in a prosopagnosic = 124
      • 5.5 Two types of relations between a specialized face recognition system and an object recognition system = 132
      • 5.6 An agnosic patient with preserved face recognition saw this painting by archimbaldo as a face, pure and simple = 134
      • 5.7 Examples of stimuli from an experiment contrasting the availability of part information for face and house recognition = 137
      • 5.8 The anatomy of a Greeble = 144
      • 5.9 Examples of Greebles and their family, gende, and individual differences = 145
      • 6.1 Function relating word length(in letters) to reading time(in seconds) for a pure alexic patient = 151
      • 6.2 Examples of clear(unmasked) and degraded(masked) word stimuli used to assess the causal role of visual impairment in pure alexia = 157
      • 6.3 Reading time as a function of word length and visual quality for a pure alexic = 158
      • 6.4 Illustration of the problem of interference when multiple shapes are represented in a distributed manner and the aviodance of this problem by adoptinglocal representation = 159
      • 6.5 Part of the letter and word representation network of the interactive Activation and Competition model = 162
      • 6.6 Representations of the upper- and lower-case forms of three letters, which developed spontaneouly in a Hebbian network exposed to upper- and lower-case words = 170
      • 7.1 ERP evidence concerning the timecourse and location of attentional effects in vision = 181
      • 7.2 An early PET experiment, showing the two conditions that were subtracted with the intention of isolating spatial attention effects invision = 183
      • 7.3 Example of a trial from a PET experiment on attention to different dimensions of vision = 185
      • 7.4 Typical displays, showing location to which attention was cued, and resultant neural activity in a classic study of attentional effects on individual neurons in monkeyarea V4 = 188
      • 7.5 Typical sequence of stimuli, and schematic represen of neural activity, in an experiment on attention to object properties = 190
      • 7.6 Areas citical for spatial attention in the human and monkey brains = 198
      • 7.7 Examples of procedure and results from a classic study of space representation in Area 7a of the parietal lobe = 200
      • 7.8 Three conditions, and representative results from a neuron in area LIP, demonstrating nonretinotopic coding of location = 202
      • 7.9 Demonstration of the spatially coincient visual and tactile receptive fields ofneurons in LIP = 204
      • 8.1 The line cancellation performance of a patient with left neglect = 209
      • 8.2 Two attemptsto copy simple figures by a patient with left neglect = 210
      • 8.3 Reconstructed lesions of eight patients with severe neglect, showing the location of maximal overlap in the inferior posterior parietal region = 210
      • 8.4 A demonstration of the dissociability of local and global form informatiion = 213
      • 8.5 A map of the Piazza del Duomo in Milan, showing the two locations at which neglect patients wire to imagine themselves standing, and the locations of the landmarksvisualized from memory = 216
      • 8.6 A very simple model of spatial attention = 218
      • 8.7 Manipulations of patient position used to disentanglethe contributions of two nonretinotopic frames of reference used in the allocation of spatial attention = 224
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼