RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Trends in Military Spending of China and Four ASEAN Countries: A Time Series Analysis Approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105272812

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      One of the most evident signs of China’s rise in the global arena has been represented by the growth of China’s military spending since the early 1990s. While the expansion and modernization of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) cannot pose an immediate threat to U.S. power projection across the globe, it is undeniable that it is perceived as a threat to the regional stability. In particular, the South China Sea represents a future possible theater of a military confrontation between China and ASEAN countries that have claims or partial claims over those waters and adjacent islands. While China remains the biggest biggest spender in the Asian region and the country’s military spending exceeds the military budget of the other main countries in the region combined, data on military expenditure show that ASEAN countries have been attempting to boost their military in the recent years.
      The current study attempts to investigate the arms race among those countries: Using time series analysis, the study analyzes the temporal relationship between the increase of China’s defense spending and the increase of military spending by ASEAN countries that have territorial claims in the region. The findings of our study do not support the claim that such temporal relationship exists. We argue that bilateral trade relationships between China and ASEAN countries and reliance on military support from the U.S. in the region could partially explain the insignificant relationship.
      번역하기

      One of the most evident signs of China’s rise in the global arena has been represented by the growth of China’s military spending since the early 1990s. While the expansion and modernization of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) cannot pose an i...

      One of the most evident signs of China’s rise in the global arena has been represented by the growth of China’s military spending since the early 1990s. While the expansion and modernization of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) cannot pose an immediate threat to U.S. power projection across the globe, it is undeniable that it is perceived as a threat to the regional stability. In particular, the South China Sea represents a future possible theater of a military confrontation between China and ASEAN countries that have claims or partial claims over those waters and adjacent islands. While China remains the biggest biggest spender in the Asian region and the country’s military spending exceeds the military budget of the other main countries in the region combined, data on military expenditure show that ASEAN countries have been attempting to boost their military in the recent years.
      The current study attempts to investigate the arms race among those countries: Using time series analysis, the study analyzes the temporal relationship between the increase of China’s defense spending and the increase of military spending by ASEAN countries that have territorial claims in the region. The findings of our study do not support the claim that such temporal relationship exists. We argue that bilateral trade relationships between China and ASEAN countries and reliance on military support from the U.S. in the region could partially explain the insignificant relationship.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 류동원, "중국의 남중국해 전략 변화 : 새로운 확대전략의 실천과 특징" 아태지역연구센터 39 (39): 185-219, 2015

      2 김태성, "미국의 아시아태평양 해양안보전략 분석 및 영향" 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 31 (31): 61-91, 2016

      3 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁과 필리핀의 헤징전략" 글로벌정치연구소 8 (8): 63-98, 2015

      4 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁과 베트남의 전략" 한국동남아학회 26 (26): 1-37, 2016

      5 "https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat"

      6 "https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Trends-world-military-expenditure-2016.pdf"

      7 "https://www.sipri.org/publications/2016/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2015"

      8 "https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex"

      9 "https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/07/30/world/asia/what-china-has-been-building-in-the-south-china-sea.html"

      10 "https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/world/asia/south-china-sea-dispute-arbitration-explained. html"

      1 류동원, "중국의 남중국해 전략 변화 : 새로운 확대전략의 실천과 특징" 아태지역연구센터 39 (39): 185-219, 2015

      2 김태성, "미국의 아시아태평양 해양안보전략 분석 및 영향" 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 31 (31): 61-91, 2016

      3 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁과 필리핀의 헤징전략" 글로벌정치연구소 8 (8): 63-98, 2015

      4 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁과 베트남의 전략" 한국동남아학회 26 (26): 1-37, 2016

      5 "https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat"

      6 "https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Trends-world-military-expenditure-2016.pdf"

      7 "https://www.sipri.org/publications/2016/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2015"

      8 "https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex"

      9 "https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/07/30/world/asia/what-china-has-been-building-in-the-south-china-sea.html"

      10 "https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/world/asia/south-china-sea-dispute-arbitration-explained. html"

      11 "https://www.ft.com/content/ebd9b4ae-296f-11e2-a604-00144feabdc0"

      12 "https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2015-03-19/chinas-double-digit-defense-growth"

      13 "https://www.forbes.com/sites/timdaiss/2016/05/22/why-the-south-china-sea-has-more-oil-thanyou-think"

      14 "https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2015_China_Military_Power_Report.pdf"

      15 "https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/countering-chinas-military-modernization"

      16 "https://www.businessinsider.com.au/why-the-south-china-sea-is-so-crucial-2015-2"

      17 "https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-much-can-the-philippines-boost-its-military-budget-unde r-duterte"

      18 "https://thediplomat.com/2016/10/vietnams-military-modernization"

      19 "https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/the-south-china-sea-wont-stop-china-asean-economic-ties"

      20 "https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/the-south-china-sea-is-really-a-fishery-dispute"

      21 "https://thediplomat.com/2016/04/asias-military-spending-fueled-by-heightened-tensions-with-c hina"

      22 "https://thediplomat.com/2016/03/us-upgrades-economic-ties-with-asean-amid-chinas-growing-i nfluence/"

      23 "https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/the-truth-about-philippine-military-modernization-and-the-chi na-threat"

      24 "https://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/28/asia/south-china-sea-islands-aircraft-hangars/index.html"

      25 "http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-military-spending-ambitions-fuel-asian-arms-race-studiessay-1456095661"

      26 "http://www.strategicdefenceintelligence.com/territorial-disputes-to-drive-malaysia-s-defence-ex penditure-over-next-five-years"

      27 "http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinas-actions-driving-up-defence-spending-in-region"

      28 "http://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20170518016005&wlog_tag3=naver"

      29 "http://www.defence.gov.au/ADC/Publications/IndoPac/Rustandi_IPSP.pdf"

      30 "http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-05/26/content_20820628.htm"

      31 "http://news.ihsmarkit.com/press-release/2016s-15-trillion-global-defence-spend-kick-decade-gr owth-ihs-markit-says"

      32 "http://nationalinterest.org/blog/5-trillion-meltdown-what-if-china-shuts-down-the-south-china-16996"

      33 "http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/08/03/salami-slicing-in-the-south-china-sea/"

      34 Box, George EP, "Time series analysis: forecasting and control" John Wiley & Sons 2015

      35 Emmers, Ralf, "The changing power distribution in the South China Sea: Implications for conflict management and avoidance" 62 (62): 2010

      36 Heginbotham, Eric, "The US-CHina military scorecard:Forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power" Rand Corporation 1996-2017, 2015

      37 Hong, Zhao, "The South China Sea dispute and China-ASEAN relations" 44 (44): 2013

      38 Kim Dongwook, "The Responses of Neighboring Countries toward the Spratly Island and a Solution to the Conflict" 39 (39): 2012

      39 Kamphausen, Roy, "The "people" in the PLA: Recruitment, Training, and Education in China’s Military" ARMY WAR COLL STRATEGIC STUDIES INST CARLISLE BARRACKS PA 2008

      40 Jeong, Gab-Yong, "Study on Legal Implications of the China’s Nine-dash Lines in the South China Sea" 16 : 2014

      41 Ba, Alice D, "Staking Claims and Making Waves in the South China Sea: How Troubled Are the Waters?" 33 (33): 2011

      42 Denny, Roy, "Southeast Asia and China: balancing or bandwagoning?" 2005

      43 Hackett, James. T., "Routledge/IISS, 2014" Routledge/IISS 2014

      44 Poling, Alan, "Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances" Springer Science & Business Media 2013

      45 Liff, Adam. P., "Racing toward tragedy?: China’s rise, military competition in the Asia Pacific, and the security dilemma" 39 (39): 2014

      46 Malczewska, Klaudia, "On Their Own Paths. Japan and China Responses to the Global and Regional Challenges" Łódź University Press 2015

      47 Bing, Ngeow Chow, "Malaysian policies toward China and the South China Sea" 4 (4): 2016

      48 Yoon Sukjoon, "Implications of Xi Jinping’s" true maritime power": its context, significance, and impact on the region" 68 (68): 2015

      49 Sutter, Robert, "Handbook of the US-China Relations. Cheltenham" Edward Elgar Publishing 2016

      50 Jan, George, "Handbook of Global Political Policy" CRC Press 211-230, 2000

      51 Chase, Michael S., "Handbook of Defence Politics: International and Comparative Perspectives" Routledge 2008

      52 Holden, Ken, "Economic forecasting: an introduction" Cambridge University Press 1990

      53 Cordesman, Anthony. H., "Chinese Strategy and Military Modernization in 2016: A Comparative Analysis" Rowman & Littlefield 2016

      54 Lim, Yves-heng, "China’s naval power: an offensive realist approach" Ashgate Publishing, Ltd 2014

      55 Chang, Teh K., "China’s claim of sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A historical and legal perspective" 23 (23): 1991

      56 Morton, Katherine, "China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible?" 92 (92): 2016

      57 Chang, Felix. K., "China’s Naval Rise and the South China Sea: An Operational Assessment" 51 (51): 2012

      58 Chang, Noh S., "China and Maritime Disputes in East Asia" 21 : 2003

      59 O’Rourke, Ronald, "China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities:Background and Issues for Congress" DIANE Publishing 2010

      60 Dittmer, Lowell, "China Dreams: China’s New Leadership and Future Impacts" World Scientific Publishing 2015

      61 Sean Chen, "CHINA’S MILITARY SPENDING: SOFT RISE OR HARD THREAT?" 극동문제연구소 33 (33): 47-67, 2009

      62 Fuquan Tang, "Basic experience in building the People’s Navy led by the Communist Party of China" (3) : 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Area Studies KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.67 0.67 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.46 0.768 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼