표준화와 요구사항 불확실성이 소프트웨어 개발예산 초과에 미치는 영향

국문 초록 (Abstract)

일반적으로 소프트웨어 프로젝트들은 필연적으로 다양한 형태와 강도의 불확실성을 동반하기 때문에, 적절한 통제나 조정이 이루어지지 않으면 프로젝트들은 쉽게 통제 불가능 상태가 되거나 예산초과와 같은 심각한 추가자원소요 현상을 초래하게 된다. 이에 따라, 본 연구에서는 이러한 예산초과에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 식별하고자 하며, 기존연구들을 통해서 세 가지 가설을 도출하여 구조방정식 모형으로 실증분석 하였다. 123개의 프로젝트들로부터 수집된 데이터를 이용한 검정결과, 세 가지 가설로 구성된 연구모형이 채택되었다. 즉, 요구사항 불확실성은 잔여성과위험을 증가시키고 표준화는 감소시키며, 잔여성과 위험은 예산 초과율을 증가시킨다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김기윤, "요구사항 불확실성, 통제표준화, 상호작용이 소프트웨어 품질에 미치는영향" 12 (12): 101-120, 2002

2 Bollen, "” In Wiley Series" John Wiley and Sons Inc 1989

3 Kydd, "“Understanding the InformationContents in MIS Management Tools" 277-290, 1989

4 Cheng, "“Towardan Integration of Organizational Researchand Practice" 85-100, 1983

5 Barki, H.,, "“Towardan Assesment of Software DevelopmentRisk ”" 10 (10): 203-225, 1993

6 Nidumolu, S, "“The effect of coordinationand uncertainty on software projectperformance residual risk as aninternational variable" 6 (6): 191-219, 1995191-219

7 Fairley, "“Risk management for softwareprojects" 57-67, 1994

8 "“Management of LargeSoftware Development Efforts" 45-55, 1980

9 & Nadler, "“Information Processing as an InterestingConcept in Organizational Design ”Academy of Management Review" 613-624, 1978

10 Snell, "“Control Theory in StrategicHuman Resource Management TheMediating Effect of AdministrativeInformation ” Academy of ManagementJournal" 199218-27

11 & Haimes, "“Assessmentand management of software technicalrisk ”IEEE Transactions on Systems" 1994187-202

12 Pfahl, D, "Using Similationto Analyse the Impact of SoftwareRequirement Colatility on Project Performance" 42 : 1001-1008, 2000

13 Na, Kwan-Sik, "Uncertainty Profile and Software Performance: A Cross-National Comparison" 70 : 155-163, 2004

14 Zowghi, D, "The Impact of Requirement Volatility on Software Develpment Lifecycle" 2000

15 Nidumolu, S, "Standardization, Requirments Uncertainty and Software Project Performance" 31 : 135-150, 1996

16 Hyatt, L, "SoftwareMetric for Risk Assessment" 1996

17 Ropponen, J, "Software Risk Management- Foundations, Principles and Empirical Findings" Jyvaskyla University Printing House 1999

18 Wiegers, K. E, "Software Requirements" Microsoft Press 1999

19 Barry, E. J, "Softeare Project Duration and Effort: An Empirical Study" 3 : 113-136, 2002

20 Malaiya, Y, "Requirements Volatility and Defect Dencity" 1998

21 Sommerville, I, "Requirements Engineering, A good practice Guide, Wiley." 1997

22 Lane, M, "Management of Requirenent Volatility Enhances Software Develoment Productivity" 1998

23 Zowghi, D, "Investigating Requirements Volatility During Software Development: Research Progress" 1998

24 Buren, J. Van, "Experience inthe Adoption of Requirements EngineeringTechnologies" 3-10, 1998

25 Hammer, T, "Doing Requirements Right the First Time" 20-25, 1998

26 Swanson, "Applying Total QualityTechniques to System Development" 567-579, 1991

27 Stark, G, "An Examination of the Effects of Requirements Changes on Software Releases" 11-16, 1998

28 Zowghi, Didar, "A studyof the Impact of Requirements Volatilityon Software Project Performance" 3-11, 2002

29 Nidumolu, S, "A comparison of thestructural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in softwaredevelopment projects" 13 (13): 77-113, 1996