RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기초 문해력, 디지털 리터러시, AI 리터러시의 구조적 관계 분석 = An Analysis of the Structural Relationship among Literacy, Digital Literacy, and AI Literacy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110253729

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined the structural relationships among basic literacy, digital literacy, and AI literacy in university students and tested the mediating role of digital literacy in the association between basic literacy and AI literacy. Participants were undergraduate students across multiple disciplines enrolled in four-year universities with campuses in Gyeongbuk and Gyeonggi provinces during the second semester of 2025.After excluding cases with missing data, responses from 182 students were included in the analyses. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS 31.0, and path analysis with competing model comparison was performed using AMOS31.0. To assess the significance of the indirect effects, a bootstrap mediation analysis was conducted with PROCESS Macro (model 4) using 5,000 bootstrap samples. The results indicated that basic literacy showed a positive effect on digital literacy, and digital literacy had a significant positive effect on AI literacy. In contrast, the direct effect of basic literacy on AI literacy was not statistically significant. Competing model comparisons supported a full mediation model, suggesting that basic literacy influences AI literacy primarily through digital literacy. Bootstrapping results further confirmed a significant indirect effect. These findings imply that fostering AI literacy in higher education should not focus solely on training the use of AI tools; rather, a staged instructional approach that strengthens basic literacy and digital literacy as foundational competencies is required.
    번역하기

    This study examined the structural relationships among basic literacy, digital literacy, and AI literacy in university students and tested the mediating role of digital literacy in the association between basic literacy and AI literacy. Participants w...

    This study examined the structural relationships among basic literacy, digital literacy, and AI literacy in university students and tested the mediating role of digital literacy in the association between basic literacy and AI literacy. Participants were undergraduate students across multiple disciplines enrolled in four-year universities with campuses in Gyeongbuk and Gyeonggi provinces during the second semester of 2025.After excluding cases with missing data, responses from 182 students were included in the analyses. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS 31.0, and path analysis with competing model comparison was performed using AMOS31.0. To assess the significance of the indirect effects, a bootstrap mediation analysis was conducted with PROCESS Macro (model 4) using 5,000 bootstrap samples. The results indicated that basic literacy showed a positive effect on digital literacy, and digital literacy had a significant positive effect on AI literacy. In contrast, the direct effect of basic literacy on AI literacy was not statistically significant. Competing model comparisons supported a full mediation model, suggesting that basic literacy influences AI literacy primarily through digital literacy. Bootstrapping results further confirmed a significant indirect effect. These findings imply that fostering AI literacy in higher education should not focus solely on training the use of AI tools; rather, a staged instructional approach that strengthens basic literacy and digital literacy as foundational competencies is required.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼