This study aims to investigate why Korean EFL learners overpassivize English unaccusatives. To identify learners' overpassivization patterns, a corpus analysis of their writing samples was conducted first. The first study attempts to find out whether ...
This study aims to investigate why Korean EFL learners overpassivize English unaccusatives. To identify learners' overpassivization patterns, a corpus analysis of their writing samples was conducted first. The first study attempts to find out whether two types (Alternating and Non-alternating) of unaccusatives and the subject animacy of the verbs influences the overpassivization error pattern. Non-native students (NNS) corpus data were analyzed by WordSmith Tools to see the frequency of the overpassivization error. It shows that the error rates of non-alternating unaccusatives are higher than those of alternating unaccusatives but that it has no significant difference in error rates between the two types of unaccusatives. It was also found that the overpassivization error rate can differ according to the animacy of subject only in the case of alternating unaccusatives. The results of the first study demonstrate that the animacy can partially play a significant role in the overpassivization error pattern.
The second study also attempts to find out whether the external and internal causation, alternation of verb, and English proficiency affect the overpassivization error pattern. Grammaticality Judgement test with 30 items was conducted on 183 Korean EFL learners not majoring in English from G University. The participants are divided into three groups (High, Middle, and Low) by their English grades on the Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). The experiment shows that there is no significant difference found in the overpassivization errors between the external and internal causation and between alternating and non-alternating unaccusatives. However, it demonstrates that there is significant difference found in the errors among the three groups. The middle group made the most errors among three groups, thereby demonstrates the U-shaped learning development. It is likely that their errors were most affected by natural features of the verb, agentivity, and L1 transfer.
Taking into account above-mentioned study and survey results, it can be concluded that non-linguistic factors, as well as linguistic factors, may affect Korean EFL learners to make overpassivization errors. In future studies, more non-linguistic factors will be considered for analysis to investigate how they pose difficulties to the learners when deciding which voice form to use.