Decomposable polynomial response surface method and its adaptive order revision around most probable point

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the classical response surface method (RSM), the polynomial RSM is so easy-to-apply that it is widely used in reliability analysis. However, the trade-off of accuracy and efficiency is still a challenge and the “curse of dimension” usually confines RSM to low dimension systems. In this paper, based on the univariate decomposition, the polynomial RSM is executed in a new mode, called as DPRSM. The general form of DPRSM is given and its implementation is designed referring to the classical RSM firstly. Then, in order to balance the accuracy and efficiency of DPRSM, its adaptive order revision around the most probable point (MPP) is proposed by introducing the univariate polynomial order analysis, noted as RDPRSM, which can analyze the exact nonlinearity of the limit state surface in the region around MPP. For testing the proposed techniques, several numerical examples are studied in detail, and the results indicate that DPRSM with low order can obtain similar results to the classical RSM, DPRSM with high order can obtain more precision with a large efficiency loss; RDPRSM can perform a good balance between accuracy and efficiency and preserve the good robustness property meanwhile, especially for those problems with high nonlinearity and complex problems; the proposed methods can also give a good performance in the high-dimensional cases.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Wong F. S., "Uncertainties in dynamic soil-structure interaction" 110 (110): 308-324, 1984

2 Jafar Vahedi, "Structural reliability assessment using an enhanced adaptive Kriging method" 국제구조공학회 66 (66): 677-691, 2018

3 Yongfeng Fang, "Structural reliability analysis using response surface method with improved genetic algorithm" 국제구조공학회 62 (62): 139-142, 2017

4 Monteiro R., "Sampling based numerical seismic assessment of continuous span RC bridges" 118 : 407-420, 2016

5 Kim S. H., "Response surface method using vector projected sampling points" 19 (19): 3-19, 1997

6 Rackwitz R., "Reliability analysis—A review and some perspectives" 23 (23): 365-395, 2001

7 Goswami S., "Reliability analysis of structures by iterative improved response surface method" 60 : 56-66, 2016

8 Liu P. L., "Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginal and covariances" 1 (1): 105-112, 1986

9 Breitkopf P., "Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications" 83 (83): 1411-1428, 2005

10 Zhao Y. G., "Moment methods for structural reliability" 23 (23): 47-75, 2011

11 Zheng Y., "Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis" 22 (22): 544-551, 2000

12 Gavin H. P., "High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis" 30 (30): 162-179, 2008

13 Nie J. S., "Finite element-based structural reliability assessment using efficient directional simulation" 131 (131): 259-267, 2005

14 Rao B. N., "Factorized high dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis" 25 (25): 708-738, 2008

15 Hadidi A., "Efficient response surface method for high-dimensional structural reliability analysis" 68 : 15-27, 2017

16 G.I. Schueller, "Efficient Monte Carlo simulation procedures in structural uncertainty and reliability analysis - recent advances" 국제구조공학회 32 (32): 1-20, 2009

17 Xu H., "Decomposition methods for structural reliability analysis" 20 (20): 239-250, 2005

18 Gomes H. M., "Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis" 26 (26): 49-67, 2004

19 Shui-Hua Jiang, "Capabilities of stochastic response surface method and response surface method in reliability analysis" 국제구조공학회 49 (49): 111-128, 2014

20 Bucher C., "Asymptotic sampling for high-dimensional reliability analysis" 24 (24): 504-510, 2009

21 Chowdhury R., "Assessment of high dimensional model representation techniques for reliability analysis" 24 (24): 100-115, 2009

22 Bourinet J. M., "Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines" 33 (33): 343-353, 2011

23 Pradlwarter H. J., "Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems" 29 (29): 208-221, 2007

24 Guimaraes H., "An innovative adaptive sparse response surface method for structural reliability analysis" 73 : 12-28, 2018

25 Hasan Basri Basaga, "An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures" Techno-Press 42 (42): 175-189, 2012

26 Weitao Zhao, "An efficient response surface method considering the nonlinear trend of the actual limit state" 국제구조공학회 47 (47): 45-58, 2013

27 Xu J., "An efficient approach for high-dimensional structural reliability analysis" 122 : 152-170, 2019

28 Zhang W., "An adaptive order response surface method for structural reliability analysis" 36 (36): 1626-1655, 2019

29 Xu J., "An adaptive cubature formula for efficient reliability assessment of nonlinear structural dynamic systems" 104 : 449-464, 2018

30 Blatman G., "An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis" 25 (25): 183-197, 2010

31 Rahman S., "A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics" 19 (19): 393-408, 2004

32 Rahman S., "A univariate approximation at most probable point for higher-order reliability analysis" 43 (43): 2820-2839, 2006

33 He J., "A sparse grid stochastic collocation method for structural reliability analysis" 51 : 29-34, 2014

34 Xu J., "A new unequal-weighted sampling method for efficient reliability analysis" 172 : 94-102, 2018

35 Rajashekhar M. R., "A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis" 12 (12): 205-220, 1993

36 Hong-Shuang Li, "A new high-order response surface method for structural reliability analysis" 국제구조공학회 34 (34): 779-799, 2010

37 Xu J., "A new bivariate dimension reduction method for efficient structural reliability analysis" 115 : 281-300, 2019

38 Roussouly N., "A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis" 32 : 103-115, 2013

39 Bucher C., "A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems" 7 (7): 57-66, 1990