고교다양화 정책에 대한 비판적 논의 = Critical Discussion on High School Diversification Policy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korea, where competition for college entrance exams is one of the most intense in the world, the policy of high school diversification, including autonomous private high schools and special purpose high schools, is of the most interest to parents and parents.
However, it is questionable whether serious discussions and reviews have been made on the validity of the policy of high school diversification, which is frequently changed depending on the regime, with little consideration or reflection on the opinions and positions of students and parents who are direct parties to education.
In this context, the political neutrality and legal aspects of high school diversification policy education, as well as the essential aspects of education such as excellence and fairness, were discussed. This provided a basis for finding a way forward for sustainable secondary education regardless of changes in the regime, and it was intended to urge the establishment of an education policy that could restore trust in school education.
Until now, the policy of diversifying high schools has not been valid for the essential purpose of education, and it is difficult to say that the "principle of political neutrality in education" stipulated in the Constitution is being realized. It is also far from the essential purpose of education. Education's excellence should be pursued through the diversification of curriculum programs based on fairness rather than the diversification of the school system.
The process of practicing fairness is the pursuit of true excellence. It is not correct from the point of view of justice that the state is only interested in the education system that meets the needs of talented students in the pursuit of excellence and neglects overall educational innovation for the pursuit of excellence for many students. A short-sighted education policy is oriented, and a long-term education policy that considers both aspects should be established in that institutions and consciousness interact. The state should establish an education policy to cultivate not only the eternal excellence of all students, but also the potential excellence. This is the true fairness and justice of education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강승규, "허프포스트코리아"

2 배천웅, "한국교육문제의 종합 진단" 한국교육개발원 1984

3 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전"

4 "초중등교육법 시행령(대통령령 제34156호)"

5 박경애, "청소년의 수월성 개발 및 촉진을 위한 한 연구" 한국청소년상담원 12-29, 1999

6 Rawls, J., "정의론" 이학사 2004

7 양승실, "이제는 외고 특목고 정책을 선진적 행정기법을 활용하여 섬세하게 추진할 때이다" (126) : 22-27, 2010

8 최준렬, "이명박 정부의 자율형 사립고 정책에 대한 평가" (126) : 16-21, 2010

9 "연합뉴스"

10 "연합뉴스"

11 김소영, "신자유주의적 개혁에서의 공교육 체제와 정치적 불평등" 4 (4): 139-162, 2011

12 이군현, "수월성 추구를 위한 교육" 18 (18): 21-43, 2000

13 김천기, "사회적 불평등 맥락에서 본 대학입학 기회배분의 주류적 공정 모델 한계와 대안적 공정성 모델 탐색" 25 (25): 1-24, 2015

14 김희삼, "사회이동성 복원을 위한 교육정책의 방향" (54) : 2015

15 National Commission on Excellence in education, "미국의 교육위기"

16 이돈희, "교육의 정치적 중립"

17 Gardner, J. W., "교육의 수월성과 평등" 재동문화사 1992

18 이전이, "교육의 공정성과 적정성의 관계 : 28개 OECD 회원국의 학업성취 결과를 중심으로" 57 (57): 309-330, 2019

19 남미자 ; 배정현 ; 오수경, "교육열, 능력주의 그리고 교육 공정성 담론의 재고" 29 (29): 131-167, 2019

20 오욱환, "교육격차의 원인에 대한 직시 : 학교를 넘어 가족과 사회로" 18 (18): 111-133, 2008

21 오욱환, "교육 공정성; 성공도 체념도 불가능한 딜레마" 11 : 178-193, 2011

22 김회용, "공정성 개념 분석과 대학입학사정관 전형의 공공성 확보 방안" 25 (25): 21-50, 2011

23 Joyce, V. T. B., "Excellence as A standard for all education" 20 (20): 9-12, 1997

24 Austin, A. W., "Achieving Educational Excellence" Jossey-Bass Inc 1985