RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      포스트휴머니즘과 인식적 변화의 필요성 고찰: <엑스 마키나>

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to discuss the need to change the perception and perspective of post-human society. To achieve this goal, this study attempts to conduct a discussion of Trans-Humanism and Post-Humanism and the analysis of the film Ex Machina (2015). Basically, Trans-Humanism is a technology based on advanced science that seeks to improve intelligence, body, and psychology through the elimination of human aging and the modification of physical capacity. In other words, Trans-Humanism is a new evolution of modern humans. In the end, Trans-Humanism adheres to Technophilia’s position that the power of science and technology can overcome the limitations of human life. From the perspective of Trans-Humanism, human nature is cliché and is abolished. And trans-humans with improved bodies to overcome biological limitations can no longer be humans. However, it can be recognized as a human from the point of view of post-human. Post-Humanism differs in that it means a review of existing humanism. Basically, Post-Humanism began with the essential question of humanism. Thus, Post-Humanism breaks the binary oppositional paradigm of humans, machines or technology. Post-Humanism does not separate humans and machines, but approaches the concept of mixing and compounding. The error of modern people with regard to the future prospect of post-human society is that people try to predict and judge the future society from the perspective of humanism. Human beings living in the present have expectations and fears about the future. However, this view is only seen from the present point of view, and in the post-human society of the future, man is not a human concept with a traditional nature. Already in the post-human society, today’s human beings are advanced humans who are combined with machines and evolved in their intelligence, body, and emotions. In other words, the expectations and fears that can arise in a post-human society are merely an extension of the traditional humanism that puts humans as subjects and recognizes other post-human subjects as others. In conclusion, post-human society is the coexistence of mechanical human beings born of newly evolved biological humans and technology, and it is necessary to realize that the machines that human beings see today no longer exist.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to discuss the need to change the perception and perspective of post-human society. To achieve this goal, this study attempts to conduct a discussion of Trans-Humanism and Post-Humanism and the analysis of the film Ex Mach...

      The purpose of this study is to discuss the need to change the perception and perspective of post-human society. To achieve this goal, this study attempts to conduct a discussion of Trans-Humanism and Post-Humanism and the analysis of the film Ex Machina (2015). Basically, Trans-Humanism is a technology based on advanced science that seeks to improve intelligence, body, and psychology through the elimination of human aging and the modification of physical capacity. In other words, Trans-Humanism is a new evolution of modern humans. In the end, Trans-Humanism adheres to Technophilia’s position that the power of science and technology can overcome the limitations of human life. From the perspective of Trans-Humanism, human nature is cliché and is abolished. And trans-humans with improved bodies to overcome biological limitations can no longer be humans. However, it can be recognized as a human from the point of view of post-human. Post-Humanism differs in that it means a review of existing humanism. Basically, Post-Humanism began with the essential question of humanism. Thus, Post-Humanism breaks the binary oppositional paradigm of humans, machines or technology. Post-Humanism does not separate humans and machines, but approaches the concept of mixing and compounding. The error of modern people with regard to the future prospect of post-human society is that people try to predict and judge the future society from the perspective of humanism. Human beings living in the present have expectations and fears about the future. However, this view is only seen from the present point of view, and in the post-human society of the future, man is not a human concept with a traditional nature. Already in the post-human society, today’s human beings are advanced humans who are combined with machines and evolved in their intelligence, body, and emotions. In other words, the expectations and fears that can arise in a post-human society are merely an extension of the traditional humanism that puts humans as subjects and recognizes other post-human subjects as others. In conclusion, post-human society is the coexistence of mechanical human beings born of newly evolved biological humans and technology, and it is necessary to realize that the machines that human beings see today no longer exist.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 본론
      • III. 결론
      • Works Cited
      • Abstract
      • I. 서론
      • II. 본론
      • III. 결론
      • Works Cited
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Pepperell, R., "포스트휴먼의 조건" 아카넷 1995

      2 박유신, "포스트휴먼 교육 텍스트로서의 SF 애니메이션 읽기- 애니메이션 를 중심으로" 한국만화애니메이션학회 (53) : 59-84, 2018

      3 Herbrechter, S., "포스트휴머니즘: 인간 이후의 인간에 관한 문화철학적 담론" 성균관대학교 출판부 2012

      4 최민자, "포스트모던 세계와 포스트휴먼 그리고 트랜스휴머니즘" 동학학회 (44) : 129-179, 2017

      5 김연순, "트랜스휴먼, 인간과 기계의 혼성적 실재에 대한 문화학적 고찰 1 -혼성적 실재의 원리적 고찰로서 혼성화의 자기조직화-" 인문학연구원 (47) : 41-56, 2011

      6 신상규, "트랜스휴머니즘, 세상에서 가장 위험한 생각?" 철학연구소 29 : 189-217, 2012

      7 강준수, "카니발적 특성으로 본 이청준의 『축제』 고찰" 한국문학과종교학회 24 (24): 21-44, 2019

      8 천현득, "인공 지능에서 인공 감정으로‒감정을 가진 기계는 실현가능한가?‒" 한국철학회 (131) : 217-243, 2017

      9 이창익, "인간이 된 기계와 기계가 된 신: 종교, 인공지능, 포스트휴머니즘" 종교문화비평학회 31 (31): 209-254, 2017

      10 양선진, "양명학을 통해 본인공지능(AI)시대의 과학기술윤리" 한국양명학회 (45) : 497-507, 2016

      1 Pepperell, R., "포스트휴먼의 조건" 아카넷 1995

      2 박유신, "포스트휴먼 교육 텍스트로서의 SF 애니메이션 읽기- 애니메이션 를 중심으로" 한국만화애니메이션학회 (53) : 59-84, 2018

      3 Herbrechter, S., "포스트휴머니즘: 인간 이후의 인간에 관한 문화철학적 담론" 성균관대학교 출판부 2012

      4 최민자, "포스트모던 세계와 포스트휴먼 그리고 트랜스휴머니즘" 동학학회 (44) : 129-179, 2017

      5 김연순, "트랜스휴먼, 인간과 기계의 혼성적 실재에 대한 문화학적 고찰 1 -혼성적 실재의 원리적 고찰로서 혼성화의 자기조직화-" 인문학연구원 (47) : 41-56, 2011

      6 신상규, "트랜스휴머니즘, 세상에서 가장 위험한 생각?" 철학연구소 29 : 189-217, 2012

      7 강준수, "카니발적 특성으로 본 이청준의 『축제』 고찰" 한국문학과종교학회 24 (24): 21-44, 2019

      8 천현득, "인공 지능에서 인공 감정으로‒감정을 가진 기계는 실현가능한가?‒" 한국철학회 (131) : 217-243, 2017

      9 이창익, "인간이 된 기계와 기계가 된 신: 종교, 인공지능, 포스트휴머니즘" 종교문화비평학회 31 (31): 209-254, 2017

      10 양선진, "양명학을 통해 본인공지능(AI)시대의 과학기술윤리" 한국양명학회 (45) : 497-507, 2016

      11 정지훈, "미학적 주체로서의 포스트휴먼?" 한국영상문화학회 (33) : 83-126, 2018

      12 Barnett, Christopher, "미래가 보이는 25가지 트랜드" 더난콘텐츠그룹 2012

      13 Berger, John, "다른 방식으로 보기" 열화당 2012

      14 Hayles, N.Katherine, "나의 어머니는 컴퓨터였다" 아카넷 2016

      15 강준수, "『베오울프』를 통해 본 서양문명의 자연의 타자화 고찰" 한국동서비교문학학회 (47) : 7-43, 2019

      16 Ji, Youngmin, "ioT, big data and artificial intelligence" 35 (35): 43-50, 2017

      17 Wolf, Cary, "What is Posthumanism?" University of Minnesota Press 2010

      18 Shin, Sangkyu, "The future of Homo sapiens" Akarnet 2014

      19 Kurzweil, R., "The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology" Viking Penguin 2005

      20 이경란, "The Posthuman" 아카넷 2015

      21 More, Max, "The Overhuman in the Transhuman" 21 (21): 1-4, 2010

      22 Kim, Myeongju, "The Need for Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Trends at Home and Abroad" 34 (34): 45-54, 2017

      23 홍은숙, "The Ghost in the Shell에 나타난 인간지능과 인공지능" 인문과학연구소 (85) : 225-254, 2018

      24 Chung, Kido, "Me, avatar, and virtual world" Chaeksesang 2000

      25 Son, Whacheol, "Humans in the Post-Human Era" Akarnet 2016

      26 Hayles, N.Katherine, "How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Information, and Informatics" Chicago University Press 1999

      27 Lee, Sangwook, "Desired technology" Eastasia 2009

      28 Kim, Daeshik, "Daeshik’s Human vs. Machine: What is Artificial Intelligence?" Eastasia 2016

      29 Thweatt-Bates, Jeanine, "Cyborg Selves: A Theological Anthropology of the Posthuman" Routledge 2016

      30 Lee, Kyunmyeong, "A.I" Saengneung Publishing 2018

      31 Kurzweil, R., "21세기 호모 사피엔스" 나노미디어 1999

      32 박영석, "21세기 SF 영화와 포스트휴먼의 조건 -정신과 신체의 인공적 관계를 중심으로-" 현대영화연구소 14 (14): 427-458, 2018

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.45 1.007 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼